gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:43 AM
Original message |
I think Obama's statement was exceptionally good today -- |
|
covered a lot of good points, not "too" much, sounded so reasonable.
You?
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Conservatives will be in a poutrage about not a AAA political system |
SpiralHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. "Whine. Whine. Whine." - RepubliBaggers Against America (R) |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 09:47 AM by SpiralHawk
|
Raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Agree. Loved the AAA government remark. n/t |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
3. he needs to DEMAND a clean debt ceiling bill from Congress |
|
the time has passed to nitpick over spending and taxes. The debt ceilling and deficit are unrelated and need to be handled seperately
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. Agree. I'm worried if he thinks he can get a compromise with ANY Republican. |
|
Shit. They can't even agree on a bill within their own party. How does he think they can come up with one that will pass the Senate?
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
19. by the time these bills get to the floor for vote it will be late Sun or Mon |
|
leaving little/no time to try again before Tuesday
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
38. I think there ARE some Republicans who want to get this resolved, |
|
and who are willing to compromise, it's just those whiney smart-ass know-it-all Teabaggers who are holding this all up. And of course, Boehner can't kick ass like Pelosi could, so here we sit. :(
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
36. Yeah, he should have made it a little more clear that the bill |
|
that Boehner, et al, are spinning their wheels over isn't even going to be passed, so it's a colossal waste of time. Stop it and move on. We got it because we know, but I'm not sure if those who aren't paying close attention (like everybody I know, it seems) would realize the futility of this game.
|
brooklynite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
5. If you were a member of Congress... |
|
would your inclination be to do anything different than you did yesterday because of this speech?
I know what the President will accept; I don't know what he WANT's.
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. He wants a deal that is not extremist nt |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. You don't know what he wants? |
jeff47
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
22. Because he's unwilling to say what he wants |
|
Probably because what he wants is actually quite unpalatable - to be the 'above the fray' guy who got his grand bargain destroying SS and Medicare in return for a small tax hike.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
jeff47
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. You should probably go back and read that again |
|
Because you're focusing on his words, not his actions. Pretty speeches can't change the fact that it was Obama who put Medicare and SS "on the table".
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. "Because he's unwilling to say what he wants" |
|
I read it again. Now watch the videos and get informed.
|
pscot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
I take his words at a very deep discount.
|
brooklynite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
43. Here's what I heard today... |
|
He'll accept the Reid Plan OR the O'Connell Plan, even though they don't include having the wealth "pay a little more", which is what he wanted on Monday.
OR he'll accept a clean Debt Limit vote.
Doesn't tell me what we really need to do....
|
styersc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Made me wish Hillary had run a better primary race. |
|
We could use a president right about now.
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
HipChick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. You think the result would be any different? |
we can do it
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
21. My Last Choice Was Last My Last Choice For a Reason |
|
just a notch above the rethugs
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
styersc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Boo Hoo, they won't be nice to me!!!! Boo Hoo they're mean!!!! |
|
Get the fuck over it and be a president!!!!!!!
|
snooper2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. damn it's been years, still bitter? |
Le Taz Hot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
23. Hillary = Obama in a pant suit. |
Fire1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
35. Not really. BILL would be running the country. n/t |
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
39. It's the Republicans who are fucking this up, and Hillary, or anybody |
|
with a (D) behind their name, for that matter, would have no influence over those Teabaggers. Hell, the Republicans can't even rein them in, and with the level of Hillary Hate among the Republicans, I honestly don't think she could have accomplished anything more. :shrug:
|
dgibby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |
9. I keep waiting for the Republicans to take him up on the |
|
Grand Bargain at the last minute.
|
Solomon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. Unlike the people here at DU the republicans know that |
|
the so called "cuts" to "entitlements" are not really the cuts in benefits that they want. That's why they won't fall for it. Only the people here at DU really believe Obama is trying to ditch social security, medicaid and medicare.
|
jeff47
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
26. Only people here at DU and members of Congress who were involved in the negotiations |
|
But hey, they're just shrill hippys.
|
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
yeah Republicans want to kill the programs forever, Obama apparently is willing to slowly move up the level of pain. "Reform" entitlement programs certainly is a dirty word to anyone that's lived through previous versions of it. They could always reform them intelligently, but hey is a Boehner lead house gonna do that? No. Why bother pretending they would :)
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
40. I hope not - I'm favoring Reid's plan (only because it doesn't |
|
touch SS/Med and there's a provision to lower the War spending by $1T).
But we'll see. I didn't think I'd be willing to accept WHATEVER, but if the dire predictions come true (if we do indeed default) every single person in the country will be affected - severely, with no "safetey" provisions to try to assuage the Left. If that makes any sense. :eyes:
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
14. He's absolutely right can't have a bill just to please the tea party idiots. |
dgibby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Obama addresses nation. |
|
Delivers barn burner of a speech. Hailed as miracle worker as hundreds of thousands are cured of their insomnia.
|
CelticThunder
(460 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Are you kidding? He'll compromise on entitlements, meaning he'll SCREW SENIORS and the poor. |
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
He called the plan that has no revenue the compromise bipartisan plan. Yeach. Never pushed just raising the debt ceiling with a one page letter like it usually is. He kept up the illusions there is a there in the fake debt ceiling crisis. Sounds to me like he really, really wants to cut entitlements to me.
On the flip side he played the calm and reasonable hand that will play well with the public. While you and I might know what's in the Senate plan, the general public doesn't and if the president says it's bipartisan and the like it is good enough for them. It's good politics, but iffy policy.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message |
24. Darn, missed it Gate. |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
37. Well, it's nothing that WE, those who are paying attention, |
|
don't know. Just basically reiterating that the only way to move on is a bi-partisan compromise. Just seemed a little more to the point, concise. And, yesterday I said I preferred it when he didn't give a "statement", but rather just "talked". Today he was obviously using the teleprompter because his head was going left, right, left, but it sounded much more "real". Maybe it was the venue - some room in the WH that he doesn't use for his SERIOUS SHIT addresses.
You didn't miss anything new. :hi:
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:00 AM
Response to Original message |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
Fire1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
34. I think it was good, in the sense that it once again showed |
|
that he is the adult in the room. Knowing full well that the teabaggers are not going for ANYTHING other than a 6 month deal and cuts to entitlements, he still had to show how unreasonable they are. The obsession with bipartisanship is PURE POLITICS.
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
41. I only read it, but it seemed alright. |
|
I don't know, it was the same as the speech the other night. There was no real info there, but I don't have a problem with him getting up there and laying it at the Republicans feet every few days anyways, just for the fun of it. :)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |