brooklynite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:22 PM
Original message |
CNN reporting House vote could come between 7 and 8 PM... |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Gee, don't hurry on our account, assholes. nt |
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This afternoon...today...tonight |
|
Is this fucker still having problems getting people on board, even with BBA back in this dog of a bill?
Holy fuck if it fails again...
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
3. In other words, they are whipping them into order |
|
and do not have the votes.
|
Bryan Buchan
(253 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Zackly...I am not holding my breath any more! |
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
5. and so could the apocalypse! |
thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. From what I have read he has enough votes. They are making amendments to the bill. |
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
7. So they either don't have the votes, which is tough to imagine since they added the BBA, or |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 01:33 PM by Parker CA
Boehner is trying to screw Reid by pushing this back as far as possible since Reid needs to move on his legislation before midnight. Not sure how much time Reid needs to make things happen in the Senate, but I think his goal is to have Boehner's plan voted out of the House before he makes a move.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. If you have the votes, why are you waiting? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |