Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

when did it become reasonable to try and force an amendment to the US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:15 PM
Original message
when did it become reasonable to try and force an amendment to the US
Constitution on a simple bill to raise the debt crisis...

Could you imagine what would have happened if the Liberal Democrats had insisted on an Equal Right Amendment to a military funding bill?

This is lunacy.

Oh and Boehner learned a new word today, Culdesac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not a bad idea....
if they can do it, why can't we?

Oh wait....because we would be labeled obstructionists and ideologues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any time the Republics don't like something.
The Party Of Small Gumbmint never hesitates to trot out an amendment to make the Constitution, and thereby the Government, LARGER every fucking TIME they imagine that they see something they don't like.

Shoot 'em in the butt with a tranquilizer dart!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. 2/3 of both Houses of Congress
Plus 3/4 of the legislatures of all the states. Do these people really think they are going to get this? How LONG would this take? YEARS!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's all a gimick, but they have 7 years by the time it passes both
house to be ratified by the states...

My point was they muddle the whole thing because you and I both know that if this was put into the bill and passed, most of their followers would think that was it, it's in the Constitution and then the RW echo chamber would set to work to say the Un American democrats are thwarting the will of the people... Yada Yada Yada...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't that amendment require a 2/3 vote in Congress to ever raise taxes again?
In the media, we never hear about what's actually in the legislation the Republicans are proposing. Such an amendment would probably end up gutting social security and medicare.

What's really funny is the press conference held by Republicans this morning. They were discussing the threat to the United States if one penny of money was taken away from the Pentagon. Out of one side of their mouths, they said we don't have a revenue problem. Moment later, out of the other side, they said that only by growing the economy will revenue be raised to save programs like social security. So the problem is or in't lack of revenue? When a reporter asked how they propose to save entitlement programs and still maintain high spending for defense without raising taxes, one of the Republican idiots told him that he was free to send a contribution to Washington out of his own money if he choose to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC