still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:33 PM
Original message |
So Nader is calling for someone to challenge Obama in the primaries. How come Nader doesn't call |
|
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 09:35 PM by still_one
for someone to challenge the republican candidates in their primaries?
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Because Nader is a dick |
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. He rears his vote dividing head every time nt |
Riftaxe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
25. Easy to avoid, just have the Democratic candidate |
|
be to Nader's left, problem solved, no votes divided.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Because he doesnt expect that any of those idiots will win? |
adhd_what_huh
(368 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Nadar can suck my ass! |
digitaln3rd
(533 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because they're already having primaries? |
|
And Nader is a liberal, so he's more concerned with getting liberal policies in the political debate.
|
HappyMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Well, we should all hold our breath.... |
|
to see what the great nader will want next....:eyes:
|
Chan790
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Because Nader sold his values for his ego. |
|
Ralph's about Ralph now. He knows that he can get good GOP money to put his face on TV but nobody at the DNC is gonna give him a dime to do anything but STFU and fade away.
I propose that Ralph wrestle Ron (Paul) to the death for the Lyndon LaRouche Memorial* Political Fringe Narcissist title...then we shove the winner into the Grand Canyon.
*-I'm aware that LaRouche isn't dead but some optimism is needed in this moment.
|
beac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. I say he wrestles both Ron AND Rand Paul and then |
|
we throw all three into the canyon. Though that would be a truly vile act of littering, come to think of it.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. If Nader were to win the to-the-death wrestling match the Grand Canyon |
HappyMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. So if he can raise plenty of repiglican $$$ |
|
why the fuck would you talk about him here? :shrug:
He's so over.
|
loyalsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He's deeply entrenched in his own absolutism |
|
He has done a lot of good and raised a lot of important issues. But he got hooked on a belief that he has all the answers.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
9. What a lame post. There are 10+ primary challengers in the GOP primary. Are you really this dense? |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
20. and they all preach the same message. I think it is time for Nader to help the repuke primaries for |
|
a change
He already has done enough to the Democrats
I want a little equal time
|
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Aren't there enough Republican primary candidates already? |
|
What about that The Rent Is Too Damn High guy? Is he also a GOP candidate, or is he running on the The Rent Is Too Damn High ticket?
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Apparently you're only allowed to criticize Dems from the left if you criticize the GOP too. |
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
14. How many more GOP candidates do you think Nader should call for? |
|
What number of GOP candidates are you shooting for?
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. Nader could run in the GOP primary himself and people here would still bitch and moan. |
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
23. At least in that case, he'd be honest about his motives. |
|
Since he always works for the GOP anyway.
|
Heavy Metal Dude
(8 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Many voted for Nader in 2000 and ended up getting at least three terms of Shrub. |
|
Thanks Nader. Now go away!
|
digitaln3rd
(533 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Blame the Democratics for running a weak candidate. So sick of people using that excuse.
|
HappyMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
white_wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Good for Nader. I'm glad someone is doing it. |
|
I know he won't win, though he would be better off if he did. However, at least progressive issues will get brought up.
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Because that doesn't serve his purpose of electing Republican presidents. nt |
HappyMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
'Progressive' that helps to elect the repiglicans. :puke:
|
mfcorey1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
24. In every election he always comes in as a spoiler. He has as much credibility as Sarah Palin. nt |
HappyMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. You have won a lovely kewpie dol! nt |
Bonobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Huh? That's a really dumb question. |
|
Did you think at all before you posted that?
|
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-30-11 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
29. The Media may select us a Candidate: They keep talking |
|
about "Third Party". but not a party. A candidate who could be acceptable to both sides because we are so polarized on Left and Right. Some group is thinking about putting 'someone up.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. A lot of that polarization we can blame on that corporate media /nt |
McCamy Taylor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 04:27 AM
Response to Original message |
31. Nader wanted W., because it would mobilize the left. Now he wants Perry because it will mobilize the |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 04:28 AM by McCamy Taylor
left. Great if you make a living being a professional leftist, selling buttons, writing articles, making documentaries a la Michael Moore.
Not so great if you are one of the folks who dies in a war for oil. Or maybe gets water boarded at Gitmo for looking sort of Middle Eastern.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message |