Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romney's Low Profile on Budget Debate Rankles Foes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:09 AM
Original message
Romney's Low Profile on Budget Debate Rankles Foes
Source: Real Clear Politics

He has a penchant for boasting about how the economy is in his wheelhouse, but former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been awfully quiet on the debt ceiling debate, and his Republican rivals have increasingly taken note.

During a 20-minute speech in Ohio on Thursday, according to the Columbus Dispatch, the national front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination did not even mention the issue that continues to dominate Washington discourse.

It was only when he was pressed by reporters that Romney weighed in on the debt ceiling debate, refusing to get into specifics about the bill being crafted by House Speaker John Boehner or offer other proposals designed to resolve the current standoff.

"My position is very clear, which is, I favor a 'cut, cap and balance' program for federal spending," Romney said, as he ignored reporters' follow-up questions, according to the Dispatch.


Read more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/07/29/romneys_low_profile_on_budget_debate_rankles_foes_110764.html



The invisible front runner! If you needed more evidence that News Corp is clearing the way for Mitt Romney by not covering his rather notable disappearance as the Nation slides into economic armageddon.

Now, what is Cut, Cap and Balance?

###

-Cuts next year's projected $3.6 trillion in spending by $111 billion. Roughly two-thirds of cuts from department and agency budgets, one-third from automatically paid benefits, but leaves decisions to Congress about which programs would be cut. Exempts defense, security, veterans, Medicare and Social Security.

—Gradually decreases, or "caps," spending over the coming decade from 24.1 percent of the economy this year to 19.9 percent in 2021. Over the decade, that would mean about $6 trillion less spending than President Barack Obama proposed in his most recent budget. Congress would decide details. If a cap was exceeded, spending would automatically be cut, exempting Social Security, Medicare, military personnel, veterans and interest due on the debt

-Congress must approve and send to the states for ratification a constitutional amendment requiring abalanced federal budget before the government's debt limit can be increased. After congressional approval of a balanced budget amendment, federal borrowing authority would automatically increase by $2.4 trillion, matching Obama's request. Requires that the balanced budget amendment resemble current House and Senate proposals, which would require two-thirds majorities in Congress to raise taxes or to allow annual spending to exceed 18 percent of the economy — more severe than the 19.9 percent target for 2021 in thecut, cap and balance bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. He knows as president he'd never have to worry about a procedural issue such as this.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 12:13 AM by Skink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. He is such a chickenshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perry is going to eat his lunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Exempts defense, security, veterans, Medicare and Social Security."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, There Is A Special Carve Out For Defense...
... This is a Republican Amendment afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC