Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tea Partiers Against Deal Gain From District Spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:57 AM
Original message
Tea Partiers Against Deal Gain From District Spending
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-29/tea-party-lawmakers-against-debt-deal-gain-from-big-spending-in-districts.html

Sixty House members backed by the Tea Party, whose opposition to federal spending helped bring on an impasse over raising the U.S. debt ceiling, represent districts that last year received $43 billion in government contracts.

In 16 of those constituencies, spending exceeded $1 billion each -- more than twice the median amount for all House districts, Bloomberg Government reported today.

“People don’t like federal spending in the aggregate, but when it’s back home where you’re spending the money, that’s a different story,” said Charles J. Finocchiaro, a political scientist at the University of South Carolina, in Columbia, in an interview. The state is home to two House Tea Party Caucus members and Republican Governor Nikki Haley, elected last November with the movement’s support.

The strictest Tea Party adherents had opposed House Speaker John Boehner’s plan for a debt-limit increase before the Aug. 2 deadline. The House passed the plan 218-210, about 24 hours after Boehner postponed an initial vote to line up more supporters. Twenty-two Republicans joined 188 Democrats in opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Highly Recommended.
This crowd finds it so easy to compartmentalize. Or maybe it is just a matter of "I've got mine, FUCK YOU/"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rec
This post needs to be seen by everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, at least we know where to start when the mandatory cuts
are negotiated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep. What hypocrites!
In this morning's paper, there was an article describing South Carolina's redistricting. The current plan has the the counties in which the Savannah River Site resides all in one district, rather than the current two. Some of the local "less government" repugs were pitching a fit over the fact that the SRS is only going to be represented by one Congressman now. In other words, fewer people to defend the amount of federal dollars that are coming into this shithole state. Goddamn hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC