Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the President has always known the 14th Amend is in his back pocket

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:12 AM
Original message
I think the President has always known the 14th Amend is in his back pocket
The White House has always said that it is not an option. Frankly I think that they know it is an option. However, in negotiation, you never present your last option (BATNA - Best Alternative To Non-Agreement) until you absolutely must.

I think if the Teabaggers continue to hold the House hostage to raise the debt ceiling the President will raise it himself. He will show his "bold" leadership and make the decision himself.

Just my very weak two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cantbeserious Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama Exercising The 14th Amendment Without Compromising SS and Medicare
Would get my vote back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Q: how did it get to the last option state? A: embracing the republican agenda lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. If he uses it he needs it to look as if he was forced to use it
and stating earlier that it was a possibility would have destroyed that argument.


I am still doubtful that anything can pass The House so this may still happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Right on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. I just don't think the "It's all a bluff" explanation holds any more water than "It's 11-D chess."
The problem with both types of explanations is that the President has time and time again gone and stated this or that is his course of action. This is not directed at you, specifically, but the concept that it's "all a bluff", especially, is only something that people are trotting out on message boards in order to control dissent.

Outside of that scope, you'll see it has 0% traction.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titaniumsalute Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Using a BATNA in a negotiation isn't a bluff
There's always an outcome. What is the White House's idea of a best outcome? Probably a deal between Dems and Reps. But if that doesn't happen there's two more alternatives. 1. the 14th amendment. 2. All out default.

I would make an educated guess that Obama would use the 14th amendment before an all out default.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sportsguy Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. But Plouffe Just Said On MTP The 14th Was Not An Option
or is it? I don't know why Obama would wait, and accept the political risk he'd take in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think that as well but I really hope he doesn't


at the last minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. It is an option but it is a terrible option.
He has obviously known about it and would likely attempt to use it in the end if the country collapses but he also knows it would result in a constitutional crisis. Rachel had a liberal constitutional lawyer on the other night and he said whether or not Obama can even use the 14th under these circumstances is totally nebulous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Unfortunately, he mixed up with his white flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC