budkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:46 AM
Original message |
Depressing tweet by Nate Silver |
|
"You can make a good argument that the proposed deal is worse for Democrats than Boehner's original bill." http://twitter.com/#!/fivethirtyeight/status/97678936586190849
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
1. But this is compromise so it's a win! |
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. GO BipartisanShit! Above all else, make it a joint screwing |
|
Of our country, Mr. president.
|
trayfoot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I've come to the reluctant conclusion |
|
that I cannot believe either the reTHUGs or the dems! I hate that. I had such high hopes for President Obama. But when the dems allow the pubs to take everything away from the middle class and the working poor, it is time to look for another vehicle to push progressive objectives.
|
theophilus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. We seem to be in the same boat. n/t |
Demit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Is he going to present the argument in his next 140-character tweet? |
|
Honestly, I swear. What passes for communication these days.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. ROFL...You "could" make the argument...that's all a lot of folks need |
|
Of course, you "could" make the opposite argument.
I wish somebody would make both rather than skipping those steps and straight to the rending of garments and gnashing of teeth mode.
:rofl:
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Vote out the terrorists in 2012.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
6. that's why boehner's original deal failed...it wasn't wicked enough |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I'd like to see the argument |
|
a statement doesn't prove anything, although the agreement does sound crappy in many ways.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. Indeed...it's amazing that such a thing doesn't appear to occur to the OP |
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Does Nate have a link to the specifics on the proposed deal? |
|
I guess I'd like to see that, before I agree or disagree with him on this.
|
EC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Nate Silver is really getting full of himself lately. Boner's first plan was the Ryan Plan...how is that better?
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
every flawed opinion is wisdom!
Deep!
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-31-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Really? You could? OK, make it. |
|
I'll make the argument that it's better than the Boehner bill and the Reid bill, at least in terms of what we've heard.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |