Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Theoretical question: If Obama *DID* destroy trust with Seniors by backing Social Security cuts...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:19 PM
Original message
Theoretical question: If Obama *DID* destroy trust with Seniors by backing Social Security cuts...
...would you still trust him to protect the other sacred planks in the Democratic Party platform?

Conyers on Jobs: “We’ve Had It.” Lays Out Obama, Calls for Protest at White House:
"We've got to educate the American people at the same time we educate the President of the United States. The Republicans, Speaker Boehner or Majority Leader Cantor did not call for Social Security cuts in the budget deal. The President of the United States called for that," Conyers, who has served in the House since 1965, said. "My response to him is to mass thousands of people in front of the White House to protest this," Conyers said strongly.


How are we possibly going to convince Seniors and others who have trusted the Democratic Party to protect the social programs that they rely on, that the party isn't just giving lip service to protecting them?

PB

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. by actually NOT just giving lip service perhaps? If the TeaPartyTerrorists can hang together
to crucify the middle class, why can't progressives hang together and throw a monkeywrench in to help SAVE the social safety net, and the middle class dream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Progressives ARE hanging together, I'd answer. But the President is going around them:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Becaue they gave lip service to the Democratic Party at the polls?
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 04:27 PM by Davis_X_Machina
65 and up broke for McCain by 10 points. No other age group broke for him. Over 65 voted +19 R in the mid-terms -- the largest Republican tilt in at least 20 years.

Politicians respond to incentives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Do you think those numbers will hold?
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 04:31 PM by Big Blue Marble
He is likely to see even more defections in this voting block next time. Seniors do vote in large numbers
and they are sitting up and taking notice of his willingness to cut these programs.

Frankly, i am far more concerned how his position undercuts the Democrats opportunity to take back the house
after the Ryan assault on Medicare. They were in process of setting up a big win, when Obama undercut
this strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. So then you believe this is a punitive action against seniors because many are Republican?
How very 3rd grade of him.
He lost 9 points with them in the mid-terms because he acted against his stated platform and you believe it is not worth restoring their faith in Democrats but rather instead to take punitive action against the programs that they rely on.
Besides being childish and cruel the point you make is not likely to get more of their votes but rather less, making it stupid politics as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If you're running on the slogan "Winning the Future"...
....aren't you tipping your hand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Well that would make sense in a deranged sort of way if that group was who was being threatened.
They're not going to destroy SS/Medicare for current seniors, they love the idea of cutting them for future seniors, though. All the other age groups that got him elected are who will get screwed when cutting time comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't trust him now.
He lost me with the Public Option debacle. "Looking forward" didn't sit well, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There are at least 69 Democratic House members and many Senate Dems who feel the same way.
The 69 signed a demand to the President not to offer up Social Security/Medicare/Medicaid cuts/changes- which the President ignored.

While the President may not be trustworthy to protect Classic Democratic ideals, there are lots of Democrats in the House and Senate who are desperately trying to keep Obama from trashing the credibility of the Democratic Party.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Let us hope they have enough votes to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't trust him to do so now.
So of course not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yeah, that's about where I'm at too, sadly.
My Congressional reps are on the same page too. What a clusterfuck.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh hell no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. no
I already view him as a major disappointment - a man who could not understand his times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. +1
Your comment reminded me of something a supporter of the President's current course of action said. It was something to the effect of "For every time there is a President, and President Obama is the right president for this time."

It was sometime yesterday or the day before. Anyway, I haven't forgotten the comment because I couldn't possibly think of a more mis-matched president for our time than President Obama has shown himself to be. What we needed was candidate Obama. He would have been excellent for our time and, my god, I can only imagine how much less the bullshit would be if HE had taken office.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. "still trust"
That implies that trust existed to start with.

Perhaps that is an assumption that ought not be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. It surely is theoretical... because he hasn't done so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Absolutely NO ... I DON'T trust him now, not one bit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Very good question. If they are this eager to get rid cut social security
then what are they going to do with medicare and medicaid? The problem with the games he plays with the republicans is that his backers do not understand what he really believes in. He no longer seem like the Obama that we saw on the campaign trail that was so eager to bring some change back to the government. At least with booosh I knew that he wanted to take everything away from us. Now I don't know if anyone really wants to keep the safety net.

I went into try to use my debit card with the social security on it. It would not go through - probably because it is not the 1st yet - I had to put several items out of my cart back. Standing around me watching were several seniors - when I looked up we all had the look of fear on our faces. Seniors take this very hard. We are vulnerable and know just how precarious our lives are. Many of us are old enough to remember the last depression. He is not going to just be able to talk us out of this. Once our faith is shaken the memory remains. And seniors already vote the other way too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. If your Aunt had testicles, would you call her your Uncle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. I don't trust him now.
So no.

I don't trust very many people in our government to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. If the mentality is such that we can only grow or maintain current entitlement spending; yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC