Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you just hear Jonathnt Alter om MSNBC? He said "What nobody is talking about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:33 PM
Original message
Did you just hear Jonathnt Alter om MSNBC? He said "What nobody is talking about
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 05:35 PM by napi21
if that the Bush tax cuts WILL expire at the end of 2012 and there's nothing the Pubs can do about it. Even if they get t through Congress somehow, Obama will still be in office, whether he wins the election or not, and he will veto an bill that would prevent them from expiring."

Maybe they're no talking about it because that would prevent many Pubs from vting for this bill, but they'll finally e GONE! I think that's GREAT NEWS!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately, Ma'am, There Is Serious Doubt He Has The Intestinal Fortitude To Do This
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We have seen this before.
He will cave again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I don't know...that seems exactly the kind of politics he likes...
flip around, flop around, make me worry he isn't gonna follow through and then, "Whap". It is done. I think Obama has the potential to make up for all of this in his second term when he doesn't have to worry about the middle as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. True, about the time i am so disappointed in his decisions he
improves the direction of the country. Osama was pretty darn gutsy, not letting Pakistan know what we were up to as it seems they knew where he was. We shall see, I have butterflies and fear over this whole situation. I was wanting him to invest more into economic growth, stimulus, but it seems the repubs cut him off at the pass all the time with the required 60 vote requirement to pay Anything! As I recall, he didn't let the bush tax cuts expire due to keeping the unemployment checks coming since the repubs were trying to cut them off. Who knows if that was a good bargain or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. +1 Thank you for your honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. My thoughts exactly, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. +1
This is a real possibility, IMO. I real possibility that he extends them again.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Unfortunately, Sir, you are probably correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffrey_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. He won't be running for re-election...
so I'm still holding out hope that things change if/when he wins in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. he coulda/shoulda done that last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. In deference to president Obama....
I believe he felt increasing taxes by letting the Bush tax cuts expire would have taken money out of the economy when it was needed. I believe he felt he could not get any more public spending through so that is why I believed he decided to extend the cuts...

I don't agree, but that is why, I believe, he extended those cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Yes, because putting all that money into "the economy" did such great 'job creation'
Oh, wait. You mean the wealthy is hording their cash in equities and savings vehicles and not spending it?

Well, at least its still in "the economy", right?

I am so depressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
59. But they're jobs creators!
Look at all the jobs they've created since the Bush tax cuts were enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. WTF? This is blatant historical revisionism. Republicans forced the extension
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 05:54 PM by KittyWampus
for Unemployment Benefits.

That is why CONGRESS extended those tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. So, did Congress extend those cuts or did Obama get benefits extended?
LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. I believe they had to work in concert....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. Of course they did, as all Congresses work with
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 06:54 PM by EFerrari
presidents. And iirc, it was Obama's package. I find it amusing that the benefits are sometimes attributed to Obama alone while the down side is always Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. It's not blatant historical revisionism....
It's merely how I believe president Obama justified going along with the extension.

I know it's always tempting to write something before you actually read it and I have been guilty myself, but I was going to his justification and not his explanation.

I am not an historian just someone making an observation so it really isn't as dire as you make it out to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. And to keep them for the middle class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. WTF? And that's how that money created jobs and solved unemployment, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Did you actually read what I wrote....
"I don't agree, but that is why, I believe, he extended those cuts."

This is what I believe he used as justification to agree to the extension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Yes, I did read it. I saw that you didn't agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
49. I thought he extended the cuts in order to get a year's worth of unemployment benefits
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 07:08 PM by Auntie Bush
for the 99ers. Or was that just an excuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. I believe that was the deal...
But I also believe that he used this thinking to justify the trade off...

Again, I was just supposing, looking at how I think he approaches stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Yep....shoulda done it last year...
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 06:46 PM by KoKo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, he is 100% right! I said the same in my earlier posts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wasn't this true even before this deal. Weren't they set to expire anyhow at the end of 2012? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I will believe those tax cuts have expired on 1/1/13 if it actually happens.
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 05:50 PM by LonePirate
More than likely, Obama will cave again and extend them a second time or Congress will wait three or so weeks and pass them for his successor to sign if he loses re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. You mean his successor.
His predecessor was boooooooosh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes, I meant successor. Thanks. I have made the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. And I'm sure the GOP won't create another crisis and hold
something hostage so that the tax cuts have to be renewed.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. Hell, that's the only game they know
No good ideas only obstruction. They never gave Pres. Clinton a break even before the election. Dirty dealing from the beginning. I expect nothing less in the future. It's tough being a Dem.... too much money working against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just like he vetoed their extension in 2010?
Rest assured, there will be another hostage crisis before they come up to expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. It's certainly hard to believe otherwise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RickFromMN Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama will cave. Let's hope enough Democrats, in the Senate, filibuster any attempt to extend them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. Allegedly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. we'll have to wait to see what actually happens when they're about to expire, though
They've gotten one extension of the cuts through this term, after all. This time, though, I think they'll expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Unless they take another hostage. (or more likely, the same one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. They would have to make up for $3.8 trillion.
Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. i'm afraid repubs will just find something else to hold hostage for those tax cuts. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indurancevile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. they were supposed to expire in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
53. Really? What happened? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indurancevile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. you're joking, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. When have I EVER? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. Do you REALLY trust Obama to veto such a bill?
I remain unconvinced. To say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Maybe if he's a lame duck and has nothing to lose by then?
One can hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. And as a lame duck, I don't know whether to trust him either!
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 06:40 PM by cascadiance
Things have gotten that bad with this man that doesn't show ANY spark to stand up for progressives. If he's playing chess with us, he sure is telegraphing that he's taking us for granted.

I think it's time for a primary challenge, if nothing else but to keep a bully pulpit slot open to tell Obama what he needs to do if he expects us to do any work for him in the coming election, even if he wins the nomination.

Without any gestures towards us, I'm more focused on getting a job, and getting a progressive candidate elected to replace my outed congress critter David Wu, amongst working for other progressives to help take over our congress again with some REAL clout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I agree about a primary challenge.
Bernie Sanders suggested just that if for no other reason than to pull him back to the left. The challenger would have to be a Paul Wellstone type of guy though. Do we know any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. RFK Junior comes to mind...
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 06:57 PM by cascadiance
Feingold could do it too, but at this point I think he's in a better position to replace Scott Walker in a recall for governorship (or to take the other Wisconsin Senate slot that will become open then).

Howard Dean would always be someone I'd support.

Alan Grayson, but he'll be focused on running for congress then.

I think Bernie himself could, but I think to be practical about it, he'd need to join the Democratic Party to do it right (to just primary challenge him and not do so in the general election). Also trying to defend against perhaps both a Democrat and a Republican in his Senate election too would be difficult without being a Democrat and getting rid of a Democratic challenger in the primary first).

Ironically Helen Thomas said in an interview with James Zogby that I think that RFK, Jr's father in effect predicted that a black would be president when Obama got elected not long before he was assaassinated. If it were RFK, Jr. to face him in a primary, all the more ironic then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. Ok, I hadn't thought of that but you have a point.
Still nervous about it though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobdawg Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. He already gave the bully this particular lunch money once before.
When they were set to expire in 2010.

Their expiration would be great, but we obviously have no government anymore. Instead we are ruled by those who benefit from those tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Ah, life in a Banana Republic.
Though the charades they play do entertain many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. So if Obama loses and ends the Bush tax cuts...
...the next Republican President's economy will benefit!

Somehow I can't get too excited about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. Those tax cuts aren't going anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod1 Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. Bush Tax Cuts would most likely be extended....
They are tied with the expiration of unemployment benefits, so no revenue over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
46. how is that news?
everyone knows the tax cuts are due to expire. Its reasonable to expect they will be extended again, imo. If Alter thinks it might unfold differently this time he should give a reason. And no, Obama saying he doesnt like the tax cuts of course doesnt count as a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
52. I heard him. I was encouraged. Jonathan usually has a good read on things. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Yes he does. I like him too, even though he has pissed
me off at times over the years. He's a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
57. Actually - I think we draw the line here...
If the Bush tax cuts stand through 2012 we go on GENERAL STRIKE. Seriously if we don't draw the line somewhere they'll just keep fucking us over until we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
60. This has been his plan all along. They can't say he won't extend them....
cause he's already proven he did extend them, so they'll say it but he'll just say "I DID extend them."

It really was a brilliant strategy to end them for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC