Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Go Rachel!! Gun Massacre review.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:05 PM
Original message
Go Rachel!! Gun Massacre review.
Make bullets illegal or extremely cost prohibative. Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. maybe not solved
but it's a step in the right direction. But the NRA won't be having it.

I just made myself sick even thinking about what the NRA will say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, I have a question for them.
Who in the hell needs a 30 round clip? Can anyone from the NRA possibly justify that?

Imagine how much less carnage if he was limited to the 1994-2004 10 round (plus 1 in chamber) limit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Both the DOJ and President Clinton admitted that the 1994 ban did not affect crime at all.
And there is no evidence that lower capacity magazines result in fewer deaths. Changing magazines can be done in about one to two seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Ugh. Well if that is the case, I am even more impressed with the 61yo
woman who kept that second magazine out of his hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wouldn't have mattered--the gun jammed, and wouldn't have fired again until it was cleared.
Glocks are popular with the police because they're very reliable, but large magazines aren't. In this case a magazine spring apparently broke, causing the weapon to jam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. There has to be a solution.
I wish I knew the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Free comprehensive mental health care.
Along with throwing out the radical right and their eliminationist rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I would be on board with this. With bells on.
No way should this kid have been able to buy a gun. Hell, even a Walmart employee denied him ammo. Kid looked like a crazed animal in his mug shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Statistically speaking no change.
BATFE and DOJ concluded the Assault Weapons Ban had no perceivable impact on violent crime, homicides, the number of mass shootings, or the average number of victims per shooting.

In essence it didn't do jack shit except give Republicans control of Congress for a decade. Now how many people died because of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. This surprises me. Given the above post, I understand that changing a clip is quick
but I still think that reloading may have given someone a chance to take him down.

This whole thing just makes me sick. Especially everytime I see that little girl's smiling face. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. If you know what you are doing... not so much.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 10:08 PM by Statistical
Changing mags takes about 2 (or less) seconds. The alternative solution is a pair of guns.

The Va Techs shooter reloaded 4 times and nobody stopped him.

Likely the only thing that kept the body count down (compared to say Va Tech) was according to most accounts the shooter sprayed the crowd randomly expending ammo without any sort of plan.
Had he conserved ammo, shot the closest targets, and backed up while reloading he could have killed far more.

I am not saying this to be cold but that is the reality.

Some examples of speed mag changes with a variety of weapons & styles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls4Uq1aCiTA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzAeobt3ceU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhknaDjLFRI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbC5mEc6ipE

It takes some practice to get this good but for defensive pistol matches even I (not even in the same league as those guys) can do a combat mag change in about 2-3 seconds. That is with minimal practice. Unlike other pistol skills it doesn't take any money or ammo, just time, and repetition to build muscle memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not taken as cold but factual.
My understanding is that this was his first gun, bought Nov 30th. That lack of experience may have been the saving grace that this wasn't worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. You may be right. His state of mind likely contributed to it.
Cho was cold, and calculating. He was methodical, and that maximized fatalities.

This guy was in a rush. It was all rage, an explosion of activity with little plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
48. Nope he was supposedly had some skill with guns
The new details from Mr. Gutierrez about Mr. Loughner — including his philosophy of anarchy and his expertise with a handgun, suggest that the earliest signs of behavior that may have ultimately led to the attacks started several years ago.

As his behavior grew more puzzling to his friends, he was getting better with a pistol. Starting in high school, Mr. Loughner honed his marksmanship with a 9-millimeter pistol, the same caliber weapon used in the attack Saturday, until he became proficient at handling the weapon and firing it quickly.

“If he had a gun pointed at me, there is nothing I could do because he would make it count,” Mr. Gutierrez said. “He was quick.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/us/12loughner.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's one of the most insanely ridiculous ideas I've heard in years.
For one, making bullets illegal is itself illegal. Constitutional right.

The second idea is even worse. It would literally ONLY effect lawful use of guns. Competitive shooters go through thousands of rounds a year, but someone who is intent on committing murder ONLY NEEDS ONE. You would literally be creating a law that punished legal recreational shooters, while giving a free pass to criminals.

Not to mention the hundred million Americans who own guns would never again vote for anyone who supported such a thing, including the four in ten Democrats who own guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then the rich will be armed and the poor won't. Just ban the damn things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. As Chris Rock once said...
"I think every bullet should cost 5,000 dollars. Because if a bullet cost five thousand dollar, we wouldn't have any innocent bystander .”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. One of my favorite bits
If I recall, he goes into a riff about 2 people in an argument, one pulls a gun and then has second thoughts as to whether the other guy is worth the cost of the $5k bullet.

Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. It takes one bullet to kill someone, it takes hundreds if not thousands
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 09:23 PM by Statistical
to gain the skills to defend yourself.

Chris Rock brought up the idea of "bullet control" however he is a comedian and was making a joke. I find it sad, maybe pathetic is a better word to think someone would take a joke and try to run with it like it is a logical policy. The idea that you could reduce crime by making bullets prohibitively expensive is downright stupid. It is possible with the skills you can learn in a couple hours to make your own ammo.

So making bullets insanely expensive:
A) Law abiding citizens and Police can't afford to train
B) Criminals will just make their own illegal and low cost ammo
C) Suicide killers will just put it on VISA. Think someone looking to kill themselves in a blaze of glory really care about the unpaid VISA bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. She is amazing tonight. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Amazingly stupid/ignorant if she actually said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. No - those were my words, not Rachel's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. No problem.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 10:31 PM by -..__...
So... what did she say that prompted you to post the original comment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. She went through a list of gun massacres over the last several years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Super Bobo Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. Rwanda
The machete worked pretty well for the killers in Rwanda.

Bolster background checks and make mandatory drug testing a requirement as well.

Ban gun ownership and you get Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
51. She was amazingly ill-informed tonight
I'm a Rachel fan. I always thought she did her homework. But she seriously needed fact-checked tonight. She trotted out quite a few myths and untruths from the all plastic gun that Glock never had to he couldn't have gotten the 30 round mag if AWB hadn't expired in 2004 to the micro-stamping bullets that would solve very few crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. That should include making gunpowder & casings cost prohibitive, too.
There are gun fans who make their own bullets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. At $5000 a bullet I would have over $30,000,000.00 worth of rounds!
now that's what I call a stimulus plan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. I like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demmiblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. He died shielding his wife.
:cry:

* I didn't catch his name because I am watching online and the link kept buffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Dorwin Stoddard
Shot in the head after diving over his wife of 15 years to protect her as she was shot 3x in the legs. High School sweethearts who reunited after their spouses died while in their 60s.

Obit and photo: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110110/ap_on_re_us/us_congresswoman_shot_thumbnails

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demmiblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. .
RIP, Mr. Stoddard. :(

(Thanks, Ruby)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. If the Democratic party took that position...
...we'd simply be wiped off the map in all but some urban areas and almost completely out of power till said ridiculous position was completely repudiated. Then add a decade or so till the public forgets we ever suggested such a dopey idea.

If the Democratic party makes the mistake of even hinting that this assassination attempt is a reason for gun control we will be making a terrible mistake. The Gun Control is agenda is poisonous, completely and utterly unpopular virtually everywhere in the country and has not the votes to pass in Congress and most states and localities anyway.

No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I do not speak for the Democratic party. I speak as a citizen who is FED
THE FUCK UP with dog whistles about violence and neurotic 'second amendment remedies' from the lunatic half of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. +1,000.
The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban was one of the three biggest reasons we lost Congress for a decade, and helped bring us Newt Gingrich and the impeachment of Clinton.

This idea is a hundred times worse. Think three-quarters majority Republican House, 70 Republican votes in the Senate, and Republican White House.

Despite what a few people may believe, less than 20% of the American public actually supports getting rid of guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Yup...
Gun Control lives on for some people on forums like this, but the Democratic Party knows better and, one can only hope, never becomes associated with it nationally again.

Why some people want to go down that toxic road again, especially in light of the fact that crime rates continue to drop as gun control laws have been eliminated, is a mystery to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Well sadly it is more like 28% but going down. Still your point is valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. Chris Rock has said the same thing.
Just an FYI. It's a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. $5k a piece. Make people think twice
That is a hilarious bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. And hardly original...
Given Moynihan's statement.. it would appear that he was a bit of a comedian himself if any of his bug-eyed delusions regarding the capabilities of "Black Talon" ammo were a reality...


Among Moynihan's targets is the nine-millimeter Black Talon, touted by marketers for its "tissue-cutting" and "crushing" action. The New York Democrat wants to increase the cost of a box of these bullets from $15 to $1,500, in effect taxing the ammunition out of the market.

His proposals would also increase federal taxes (to 50% from 11%) on .25-caliber, .32-caliber and nine-millimeter bullets and impose a license fee of $10,000 on manufacturers and importers of handgun ammunition (companies dealing with only police or other government agencies would be exempted). The legislation would raise a projected $200 million a year.


http://articles.latimes.com/1993-11-15/local/me-56987_1_federal-tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. Then you'd have a black market in bullets more massive than for drugs.
You can't put the genie back in the bottle. Bullets and cartridges can be manufactured and sold illegally, just like drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. True.
I wish I had an answer.

Maybe release non-violent 'criminals' (pot users for example) and double the sentances for gun crimes?

Don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. How about release non-violent drug felons, end war on drugs, make sentences harsher
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 10:54 PM by Statistical
for repeat violent criminals (regardless of the weapon they use) and use the cost savings to massively expand public mental health.

Hell maybe you throw in a good social safety net, quality health care, affordable education, reasonable defense spending, progressive taxation and you might have a situation that resembles Canada.

You might also end up with a homicide rate that resembles Canada too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Run for office and make this happen, please?
Just let me know where to send a check.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. I wish I don't have the patients for politics. I will stick with computers & numbers.
At least they make sense. I would however donate the max to someone who promised to do half those things.

Seriously I think the violence in US (which is at a 30yr low btw) is more a condition of our culture and winner take all society than the availability of legal firearms.

Gun control is a bandaid on the rotting corpse of the American dream. Real solutions are hard and complex and cost lots of money which is why most politicians avoid them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. I think those two are very much linked.
The prisons are so full from the "drug war" that violent criminals don't get the time they deserve. But this guy didn't have a record. I know from experience in my family that the mental health care system is even more f'ed up than health care as a whole. I don't have much faith that anything good will come of this, legislatively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Richard Poplawski didn't have a record either
He only had body armor and automatic weapons and killed 3 cops in April 2009.

There HAS to be an answer.

What is the common denominator here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. He did not.
"He only had body armor and automatic weapons"


He did not have automatic weapons.

Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
47. I can make ammunition ...
So can millions of other people. Many people have already stockpiled the powder, primers and bullets necessary for reloading. In fact you can cast your own bullets from lead.

You can buy a cheap but very effective kit on Amazon.com for $31.12


Lee Loader Kit For 45 ACP Md: 90262

I made 6000 .38 special rounds using one of these kits years ago. Then I bought more a more expensive set up which enabled me to reload ammo faster. Still the ammo I made using the Lee Loader worked just as good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
49. Tax ammo and insure guns yearly
to pay for the damage drunk shooters like Cheney do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minavasht Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
52. Such a brilliant idea!
Ban bullets - why nobody else have come with this before?
It is such a simple solution.
Just write a law banning them and they will disappear overnight!
After all, bans always work - nobody can buy alcohol anymore, drugs are long gone, nobody downloads music illegally anymore!
With their shelf live of at least a hundred years, they will be gone in a heartbeat!
And the technology of making bullets is so complex, there are only 50 to 60 million reloaders to worry about.
Such a great idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC