"Surveyor" markings... yeah, that's the ticket...

[MessiahRp]

http://tinypic.com/r/op466h/7


Sounds plausible.... or not. Lying sacks of shit.

Rp

[lib_wit_it]

1. This has been posted here a few times in recent days, but I hope Dues are spreading it to every

contact and online outlet they have--wherever, for instance, they post elsewhere online. Not to mention, we should be emailing it to new and network officials. Do we have a list of contact info for them floating around here anywhere?

[MessiahRp]

2. I didn't see it but I wanted to make sure it was reposted in case it hadn't been

Every single thing they say is pure lies and verifiably so, so to me this kind of shit only seems to dig them in a deeper hole.

Rp

[Raine]

4. It can't be posted too many times IMO nt

[Electric Monk]

5. +1 nt

[tavalon]

12. No worries

It needs to be posted again and again and again. That POS needs to be sent packing back to Alaska and she needs to stay there.

[lib_wit_it]

22. Definitely. As I said, it ought to be posted on every single site on the net.

[Raine]

3. "Surveyor marks" they better try again

that's a big FAIL! x(

[Mariana]

6. They might really be surveyors marks

But if they are, she still picked them because they looked like crosshairs.

[Raine]

8. Yes and she actually referred to them as "bullseyes"

so no matter if they were official "surveyer marks" she intended them to be taken as "bullseyes".

[SoCalDem]

21. Obviously they were meant to be hot cross buns

[H2O Man]

7. Sometimes it's the

attempted cover-up that most damages politicians.

[Name removed]

9. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[upi402]

11. oh noes

don't you know they really HATE the taste of their own medicine!

we have been commanded to tone it down... like this post is the equivalent of 4 x 24hr news channels and many radio stations spewing that stuff in the first place. Now they'll cry like babies after they've provoked understandable reactions like this.

[DearAbby]

15. No they're not too swift on

understanding hypocrisy, it's like thinking you can use logic to make them understand. That fails, there is always crude sarcasm, that they can understand.

[Fleshdancer]

10. K&R and bookmarked

Thanks for posting this. I have a sneaking suspicion I'm going to need this later.

[K8-EEE]

13. What is the date of the tweet, does anybody know? nt

[Fleshdancer]

16. It says Nov 4th. The font is small and on the bottom left. n/t

[K8-EEE]

19. Thank you! nt

[Raine]

17. Nov 4, two days after the election. nt

[chollybocker]

14. "Obamacare-lovin'"? "T'aint bad"?

:eyes:

...And you wanted to be our latex salesman....

[scarletwoman]

18. You mean even Vandelay Industries doesn't want her?

[Gregorian]

20. Dan Rather's font.

In all of this, I keep thinking of how they've done this in other areas. Bush was a scatter brained idiot malfeasance, and we had proof. If I recall, that story of him going AWOL was factual. I don't remember anyone proving that those letters were fake.

So it was a bullseye. And Bush really was AWOL. And there were no WMD's.




It's not an isolated incident.

[lib_wit_it]

23. at the risk of again being misinterpreted as ctitical, I'd like to let people know that there is a

better screen grab of the tweet here: http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x150390

Earlier when I mentioned that this had been posted before--as a lead in to my suggesting we email and post this thing widely--it may have been taken as a suggestion that you shouldn't have posted it. Not my intent at all.

[Monk06]

24. Celtic Crucifixes .........