Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters: "US intelligence pessimistic on Afghan war success"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:12 PM
Original message
Reuters: "US intelligence pessimistic on Afghan war success"

WASHINGTON, Dec 15 (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies are lining up against the Pentagon in the debate over Afghanistan strategy, arguing that the prospect for success in the war is questionable despite recent military gains.

Experts within the U.S. government, including officials familiar with advice the White House is receiving, say recent progress is undermined by a weak and corrupt Afghan government and Pakistan's reluctance to crack down on militants hiding on its side of the border.

"There is a lot of skepticism within the administration about whether the strategy is working," including among intelligence and some White House officials, said Caroline Wadhams, South Asia expert at the Center for American Progress, a think tank close to the White House.

~snip~

There is a growing belief within Congress that current war policy is in serious jeopardy due to alleged Pakistani recalcitrance and Afghan corruption, according to congressional aides who said those problems were leading prominent lawmakers to conclude privately the United States should extricate its forces sooner rather than later.

So far, few if any congressional leaders are willing to voice these sentiments publicly.



http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1517095920101215
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL "Pessimistic". Call it what it is, FUBAR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. For Red Cross, Afghanistan Situation Now at its Worst
New York Times By ALISSA J. RUBIN
Published: December 15, 2010

KABUL, Afghanistan — The International Committee of the Red Cross, which usually seeks to avoid the public eye, held a rare news conference here Wednesday to express deep concern that Afghanistan security has deteriorated to its worst point since the overthrow of the Taliban nine years ago and is preventing aid groups from reaching victims of conflict.

By every measure that the Red Cross tracks, the situation has worsened throughout the country for civilian casualties, internal displacement and health care access and all of it is “against the background of a proliferation of armed actors,” Mr. Stocker said.

Throughout the country civilian casualties have risen steadily , said Mr. Stocker, pointing to the growing numbers of wounded taken to Mirwais Hospital in Kandahar, which the Red Cross supports. Compared with the 2009, admissions so far this have increased by 25 percent to 2,650, and an increasing proportion of wounds are from roadside bombs, he said.

He noted that the Red Cross may be undercounting because it can no longer travel many parts of the country. Access, he said, “in 30 years has never been as poor and as difficult as it is today.”


The IRC also believes the number of internally displaced people-refugees from fighting- is also up 25% over the last year. Hardly surprising given the decision so "surge" troops into Afghanistan by President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC