Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attorney for Boy Scouts tells judge 20 years worth of "perversion files" should be kept secret

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:28 PM
Original message
Attorney for Boy Scouts tells judge 20 years worth of "perversion files" should be kept secret
TUESDAY Jan 11, 2011 16:52 ET
Boy Scouts argue perversion files should be secret
By NIGEL DUARA, Associated Press

An attorney for the Boy Scouts of America told the Oregon Supreme Court on Tuesday that 20 years worth of so-called "perversion files" should be kept secret despite a trial judge's order to open them.

Robert Aldisert said in oral arguments that a Multnomah County judge abused his discretion when he ruled to open the files.

That launched an exchange between Aldisert and Justice Robert D. Durham, who questioned whether there was a "logical stopping point" to Aldisert's argument that the judge overstepped his bounds.

"Where is the line?" Durham said. Aldisert said the answer was to treat every case individually.

http://www.salon.com/wires/us/2011/01/11/D9KMD1D83_us_boys_scouts_abuse/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. If these files in any way refer to any form of abuse to children
the line has already been crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Grrrrrrrrrrrr!!! Gaaaaaaa!!! Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. The same (WRONG) tactic used by the Catholic church to protect it's reputation.
In the meantime, a lot of abusers are running around free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly..."Let's keep this self-contained so nothing ever gets done about it."
I guess the word "transparency" isn't in everyone's vocabulary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. If your kid was one of the kids in the files,
If you were a kid in the files, the files might be evidence. They are avoiding lawsuits.
Scum bags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC