|
Jobs go where pay is lowest, until pay starts to increase, then goes somewhere else that is cheaper still.
Manufacturers moved to Mexico, then when pay in Mexico started to rise, they moved on to Guatemala, China, India, etc.
If the system is "globalized", then it inevitably has to reach a new "equilibrium"... as wages in the "developing world" rise, and wages in the "developed world" fall. Over time the wage rates will continue to converge, if the system continues as it is currently structured.
If the workers abroad are the only ones with jobs, then the stores and so on designed to profit off the consumption that comes with prosperity will move there... and that will be where the corporate profits will come from. The interest in creating new jobs in the developed world will wane (is waning).
You are right, it is inevitable.
There are no politicians or political parties fighting this trend. All pressure is to "restructure" the domestic system in order to accommodate these changes. Busting public employee labor unions, privatizing schools (and hiring in the private schools at lower wages), talk of the pay scale that pilots face, elimination of health care benefits (or merely shifting all of the costs to the employees) coupled with mandates, increasing use of (independent) contractors, speed-ups of current workers (demanding they "do more with less").
When minimum wage laws start to be repealed (in order to bring jobs back), that's when the levelling of Developed World standards of living, in comparison with Developing World standards of living, will really begin.
The irony is that, as the economic crumbs allowed to reach labor become smaller and smaller, the reductions of demand are causing the "value" of all the stuff owned by the rich to decline. This is the real point that has politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, scrambling... the struggle to keep the value of the stuff owned by the rich from declining while the workers are dispossessed of the trappings of a middle class existence.
|