Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jumping to conclusions re: Mental Illness=Violence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:44 PM
Original message
Jumping to conclusions re: Mental Illness=Violence
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 11:51 PM by my2sense
Shortly after Jared Lee Loughner had been identified as the alleged shooter of Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, online sleuths turned up pages of rambling text and videos he had created. A wave of amateur diagnoses soon followed, most of which concluded that Loughner was not so much a political extremist as a man suffering from "paranoid schizophrenia."

<snip>
Seena Fazel is an Oxford University psychiatrist who has led the most extensive scientific studies to date of the links between violence and two of the most serious psychiatric diagnoses—schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, either of which can lead to delusions, hallucinations, or some other loss of contact with reality. Rather than looking at individual cases, or even single studies, Fazel's team analyzed all the scientific findings they could find. As a result, they can say with confidence that psychiatric diagnoses tell us next to nothing about someone's propensity or motive for violence.

A 2009 analysis of nearly 20,000 individuals concluded that increased risk of violence was associated with drug and alcohol problems, regardless of whether the person had schizophrenia. Two similar analyses on bipolar patients showed, along similar lines, that the risk of violent crime is fractionally increased by the illness, while it goes up substantially among those who are dependent on intoxicating substances. In other words, it's likely that some of the people in your local bar are at greater risk of committing murder than your average person with mental illness.

Of course, like the rest of the population, some people with mental illness do become violent, and some may be riskier when they're experiencing delusions and hallucinations. But these infrequent cases do not make "schizophrenia" or "bipolar" a helpful general-purpose explanation for criminal behavior. If that doesn't make sense to you, here's an analogy: Soccer hooligans are much more likely to be violent when they attend a match, but if you tell me that your friend has gone to a soccer match, I'll know nothing about how violent a person he is. Similarly, if you tell me your friend punched someone, the fact that he goes to soccer matches tells me nothing about what caused the confrontation. This puts recent speculation about the Arizona suspect in a distinctly different light: If you found evidence on the Web that Jared Lee Loughner or some other suspected killer was obsessed with soccer or football or hockey and suggested it might be an explanation for his crime, you'd be laughed at. But do the same with "schizophrenia" and people nod in solemn agreement. This is despite the fact that your chance of being murdered by a stranger with schizophrenia is so vanishingly small that a recent study of four Western countries put the figure at one in 14.3 million. To put it in perspective, statistics show you are about three times more likely to be killed by a lightning strike.

<snip>

edited to comply with copyright rules.
source: http://www.slate.com/toolbar.aspx?action=print&id=2280619
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've never seen so many online Bill Frists
in my life :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone who shoots 18 people has a serious mental illness....but very, very, very
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 11:49 PM by cbdo2007
few people with mental illness shoot people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. A psychopath with a total lack of empathy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellently written, and very important.
Sadly, most people don't want their cherished beliefs rocked.

And that includes "progressives".

I have been repulsed by some of the things that Thom Hartmann has said about this. He is in sad need of some re-education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unfortunately - many need to be educated
concerning mental illness. If only we felt the same compassion and urgency re this illness as we do others. SMH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Its so easy and *fun* to ridicule people as "mentally ill", use wording like the "r" word....
...and ignore homelessness.

Its why some of us have backed off from activism.

We, also, need to look at ourselves and our *own* ignorances.

Fat chance. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marengo Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. It's shockingly easy
To convince otherwise progressive people to agree to policies that effectively diminish the mentally ill to second-class citizen status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. For example
I was told the term "schizophrenia" was more of a categorization. A person is classified schizophrenic when they are unable to differentiate between reality and hallucination. In other words, "schizophrenic" is a line of demarcation. As well, a person with bipolor disorder has a personality disorder - a completely different classification of mental illness and therefore, being bipolor does not necessarily mean one suffers from or will suffer a psychotic break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. We are united in national discrimination
Hartman and just about every other host are making mental illness the scapegoat. It's going to take a century to reverse the stigmatization that the mentally ill are more violent than the healthy, despite studies that prove the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. And Hartmann and others are making life even harder for those who are LABELED!
Yet, I certainly don't hear any callers calling him out on it.

:nuke:

Its not the first time Hartmann has gotten his "facts" twisted in this manner. He has a real blind spot in this area... kinda makes ya wonder....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Thom will glady change his views upon new information
That's the difference with progressives. I never heard what you refer to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not unless he hears from a number of people. I tried.
So, then, here is one you either never heard him say, or you took it as gospel.

Thom has said more than once that "most homeless people are 'mentally ill' "

That is patently false, and he doesn't give any source at all..... because he can't.


So, here is a source for you... according to the 2005 National Mayor's Conference, 16% of homeless people are 'mentally ill'.

SIXTEEN PERCENT



That is far from "most".

He is making life more difficult for people whose lives are already nearly impossible.

Does it matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, it does matter very much
I'll add my email to yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Thank you. Life is very difficult to those of us struggling in isolation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rec, important reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. Untreated mental illness, the stats change
The only point I'm making here, if people would take the time and read things that they don't want to, is about undiagnosed mental illness, or certain types of mentally ill who are off their meds.

"There is a very small number of people with schizophrenia who are, indeed, dangerous and do things like this. It's very important to emphasize that the vast majority of people with this disease are not dangerous, and there are certain predictors in terms of who will be dangerous. Past history of violence, substance abuse, both of which are predictors for non-schizophrenics, too. But I've followed schizophrenia for 30 years, and I have never seen one of these high-profile homicides where the fellow hasn't been off his medication when he did it. Being off medication is a clear risk factor for people who have a past history.

..

People like this man, with likely untreated schizophrenia, are responsible for about 10 percent of the homicides in the United States. That means about 1,600 homicides a year.

please read the whole article

http://www.salon.com/news/jared_loughner/index.html?story=/mwt/feature/2011/01/11/jared_loughner_paranoid_schizophrenia_and_why

This is a really important point here. Because people are calling for mental institutions to come back - no no no - its the treatment that is key here, we need as a society to help those come out of the isolation and stigma of having family members who are sick, and not demonize people with an illness that can be treated. We need to make it a national health priority, more research, better treatments, and especially education and outreach at the state level.

Because these programs are getting cut back, we need to reverse that.
And on personal levels, reach out to that family member who has cut themselves off, who has changed, who we think may be engaging in destructive behavior to themselves or others.

I have lived through this in my own life, and as a child growing up. The consequences of untreated severe mental illness is devastating on a family. These families are victims too. we need to try to help people who are isolated and afraid and don't know what to do when a family member becomes ill.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. False Analogy
Just because people with mental illness don't commit crimes more than the rest of the population. Doesn't mean that people who walk into public area's and start shooting lots of people are not mentally ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC