Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

January 5th should be interesting.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:41 PM
Original message
January 5th should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. What will make it interesting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Rachel talked about it as a window, a very small one on that date in which the rules of the Senate
could be changed to a majority vote to pass. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I guess we're all going to have to wait and see.
I missed Rachel and Keith tonight so thanks for the info.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It would sure get some stuff done. :) Hope it happens. Now there's my 2 cents on hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. How did the rule get so screwed up in the first place?
And why didnt they change it before when it became obvious it was counterproductive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Beats me.
On both counts. If it is a proceedural rule of the Senate, I do not understand why the fuck it hasn't been done before now. :shrug: and I do not have any idea how it fucking just came about that we must have a superduper majority in Senate to pass shit. :shrug: again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is that the BOA dump date? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is that the day the new Congress starts up?
Whichever day it is, it WILL be interesting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes it will. Even though 2011 should be an extremely interesting year period.
I still hold on to a smidgen of hope. Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You're not silly!
Hope is never silly...

I'm holding on to a smidgen of hope too...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. how many times that day...
will the incoming "Weeper of the House" weep. On the over-under, I bet more than 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Ickyleaks gets my skin all creepy crawley. Buying stock in kleenex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. The reality is, changing "the rule" won't change the situation
Unless we get rid of the Filibuster, we could change the "rule" to require a 51-vote majority to pass legislation and still need 60--because the Republicans will continue to filibuster everything.

The only way to possibly fix this problem is the "Disneyland Approach." At Disneyland, they've got a whole crew of people who do nothing but clean up graffiti. They're equipped with cleaning agents, scouring pads and cans of paint. The theory, which WORKS, is that if the graffiti is immediately removed it will discourage people from putting more up. In the Senate's case, allowing no more than 30 Republicans to sully the halls of power (by getting ahead of the worthless fucks in campaigns, which probably won't happen because of Citizens United and the Mighty Wurlitzer, but one can dream) would solve the filibuster problem--they launch one, we immediately hold a cloture vote and end it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC