Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jared Loughner’s friend says suspect ‘Did not watch TV … disliked the news’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:11 PM
Original message
Jared Loughner’s friend says suspect ‘Did not watch TV … disliked the news’
This morning on “Good Morning America,” ABC’s Ashleigh Banfield sat down with Zach Osler, a high school friend of Jared Loughner, the suspect in the Tucson massacre.

Osler says his friend wasn’t shooting at people, “he was shooting at the world.” Regarding the high-pitched talk radio and cable news political rhetoric, Osler says his friend didn’t even watch the news.

He did not watch TV. He disliked the news. He didn’t listen to political radio. He didn’t take sides. He wasn’t on the left. He wasn’t on the right.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/jared-loughners-friend-says-suspect-did-not-watch-tv-disliked-the-news_b48040

Of course that earned a big f'ing Sludge headline and the flashing siren!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. That means nothing.
Apparently he was a fan of YouTube, putting up his own videos as well. He didn't need to watch television to be able to watch a lot of videos from television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. but he had a computer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I still wonder if he didn't post on FR---given how quickly they went
down after the first reports of the shooting and his name was mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. He was a 911 truther
do they post about that over there? Maybe scan for rambling stuff on lucid dreaming in that section?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. They were furiously scrubbing I'm sure when their site went down
all day on Saturday... Others reported, at least, as I wouldn't go over there on a dare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. I am curious what the other side thinks,
but I get that from the alphabet news anyway so no need to travel down that road either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. Where did you hear that he was a 9/11 truther? Was he a fan of Alex Jones?
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 04:37 PM by earth mom
edited to add that you can believe in LIHOP/MIHOP of 9/11 and still think Alex Jones is a whack job for the most part. :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. AP profile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ashleigh Banfield? She's on ABC? since when?
Sorry to get off topic, but I haven't seen her since her anti-war honesty got her booted from MSNBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Yes, I noticed that also. She was silenced for telling the truth
about the war. Glad to see she's back. I hope she is free to tell the truth on this network.

As for this friend's opinion, I can believe that Loughner did not like the news, but to not like, he would have to have experienced it.

He can't have been opposed to the wars, eg, since he was trying to join the military.

Also, he lived with his parents. If they watched it and commented on it, he most likely heard them. It would be interesting to know if his parents were Repubs or Dems, or political at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe the bad thoughts were beamed from the EIB satellite?
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. *GASP* You mean that the shooter was motivated by the demons in his own head,
And not the political rhetoric of the right?

Boy, that's not going to go over well here, though in the end it is probably much more truthful than the whole "Beck, Limbaugh, Palin made him do it" speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Likely correct, but this apparently is an opportunity too good to pass up
for those who want to blame the right and the hatred talk for this specific tragedy. Lots of speculation, but you won't see anyone who speculated wrong posting about how they were mistaken.

I think that was has actually scared the right the most about this is that it could have been one of their own, a fanatical idealogue in their right mind who willingly and anxiously drank the kool aide and embraced the hate doctrine. A person who listened to Limbaugh and Beck and went to the Tea Party rallies. I think the right knows that it could have been that way, so they are relieved it was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. I did, kind of.
I jumped right on it when I first heard and then saw that Palin scope graphic, then the stupid ad from Giffords' repuke opponent, Jesse Kelly. But as soon as I read (or rather TRIED to read) his you tube text videos...

since then I have been following all the new info coming out from the investigation and reporting and it just isn't there

I still think the attention to the rhetoric is good, the dog whistling is so obvious yet unreported and maybe they will start to notice more (and thanks for giving a pop quiz to the media today, quitter!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I hope that clinging to assertions from someone who hasn't seen Loughner in years
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 01:46 PM by Cirque du So-What
brings you comfort, but we haven't yet heard the findings from the FBI's cyber forensics unit. If they discover that Loughner frequented hate sites where the demons in his head received validation, I hope the DUers in those threads treat you with more respect than you've shown with your 'boy, that's not going to go over well here' gloating snark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. At this point I'm doing what any smart person does, going with what the evidence shows
The evidence, from friends, family, acquaintances, administrators, faculty, are all saying that politics was a secondary motivation to Loughner, if any sort of motivation at all. Some of his friends state that his politics were of the left, others are saying he wasn't political at all.

But the one thing that they are all saying is that this young man was deeply, dangerously disturbed, and that he needed the help of mental health experts, and they feared for him, themselves and others if he didn't get that help.

Now if that evidence changes, my opinion will change. But what I'm seeing here at DU is that a lot of people have jumped on the "RW rhetoric made him kill" bandwagon, not because of any evidence, but because it vindicates their world view and opinion. Trouble is, it makes people look like a bunch of fools when that turns out to not be the case.

If you don't want to go with the evidence, fine. But me, I'll stick with where the evidence will lead me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. So, the Congresswoman just happened to be a Democrat in the
teabaggers hit list? He probably intended to go out and shoot a Republican next time.

It doesn't matter one bit what his high school friends think. His actions obviously show a serious hatred of Democrats, regardless of how that feeling was generated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. And more...
A Democrat (in AZ!) was shot, after facing ugly criticism for her votes on HCR, as well as her criticism of the AZ immigration bill. She had spoken out against Palin's ugly attacks. She had shared her fears. She had just been through a campaign against an opponent who used events such as this: "Get on Target for Victory in November. Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office. Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly."

See: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/01/flashback-gi... for more.

Further, we were given information, and that information stands, even if some choose to ignore it.

Jared Lee Loughner: erratic, disturbed and prone to rightwing rants
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/09/jared-lee-l...

Finally, knowing the MSM, we can also make a safe assumption that if he were on the left, they would have advertised that fact loud and clear.

Nothing is set in stone, but it makes no sense to pretend that there is no evidence to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. you;re "going with" anecdotal stuff that is four years old instead of his own recent rantings
whatever suits your needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. It did shift.. kinda...
Initially the whole bandwagon was full to capacity with the "He's a right wing assassin. He did this because he heard Beck and Limbaugh and Palin telling him to do so" group

As the days pass and more evidence comes out that just isn't the case it shifts a bit..

The original group is still there but another bandwagon has pulled up for the "Well, he may not have been affected by their speech directly but their inflammatory rhetoric created a world where this could happen" crowd. Basically a case of not letting the political opportunity go to waste...

You can see the hope lingering even in this thread. "Forget what you hear from that guy who knew him 3 years ago! The FBI just hasn't found his FR posts yet! Then you'll see!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. I don't have any problem admitting when I'm wrong.
and I admit, with a little bit of shame, that if that comes to pass I will gloat about it too. But I am not going to see things that just don't seem to be there for political gain. Not even for the good that actual discussions may engender. And I have no problems with the actual discussions about the discourse in this country.

I do have a problem with looking foolish for seeing a teabagger, crazy as most of them seem to be, where there is only a broken human being that has committed a horrible act of violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoBotherMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Auditory hallucinations are not made from whole cloth
The thoughts and the voices have a locus outside the self and become jumbled communications that the sufferer trys to rationalize. He got his ideas from somewhere in the outside world. Dana ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. That was when he was in high school--maybe after expulsion he watched Fox 24/7
He probably had enough time on his hands to watch a lot of TV. He was even fired as a volunteer dog walker according to Wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcticken Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. And maybe he WAS being
mind controlled. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. He hadn't talked to Jared in years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. +1
Exactly. This guy is being shoved in our faces because it allows the media to get off without having to explain its own behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, if Loughner was fixated on Giffords since '07, how did he keep up the fixation?
Through snail mail? I doubt very seriously this man didn't take in the news or watch TV at all. We're surrounded by news, there's no way to avoid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Amazing isn't it how the media takes this crap as gospel
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 01:21 PM by RamboLiberal
And of course the RW punditry & bloviaters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Didnt watch the news, but knew a political event was at the Safeway that day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Ding, ding, ding,,
:dem: We have a winner ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Maybe through her online presence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. he didn't have a gun either
he changed. He bought a gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. How do you know the Glock was his first gun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. But I thought he was a loner?
And High School was 4 years ago.

People change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. Here is some more on why he was a loner
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41014125/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/

and increasingly paranoid.

'Friends of Jared Loughner told The New York Times that his behavior had become increasingly erratic over the past year. He feared that two of his closest friends were planning to kill him, one of those friends told the Times on Tuesday.
“He did not have many friends,” Zane Gutierrez, 21, told the newspaper. “We stopped talking to him in March of 2010. He started getting weird.”
He said Loughner would call at 2 a.m. and ask, “Are you hanging out in front of the house, stalking me?”
“He thought we were plotting to kill him or steal his car or something,” Gutierrez said. “It got worse over time.”'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Then why did he attend a
Political Event hosted by Giffords in 2007 if he wasn't interested in politics??? Makes no sense.

He could simply not like seeing women in positions of power for all we know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. "Disliked the news" because it was TOO "LIBERAL", maybe? This "friend" is so aware, he didn't
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 02:10 PM by WinkyDink
foresee the murders?

Yeah, another fame-ho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Then how did he know about the congresswoman's agenda-Where did he get over a $1000. bucks for guns
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 02:47 PM by GreenTea
and ammunition?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Uh, "high school?" That was four years ago, right?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Exactly- This is what they want us to believe!!
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 02:41 PM by GreenTea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Not possible. Doesn't fit the established narrative.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #36
54. especially as he hadnt seen him at least two years. he is as clueless as the rest of us. go figure
oh wait... that does not fit the "established" narrative either....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. So the Sheriff is a liar? Didn't know what he was talking about?



Osler says his friend wasn’t shooting at people, “he was shooting at the world.” Regarding the high-pitched talk radio and cable news political rhetoric, Osler says his friend didn’t even watch the news.

He did not watch TV. He disliked the news. He didn’t listen to political radio. He didn’t take sides. He wasn’t on the left. He wasn’t on the right.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. The sheriff has said that he was expressing his opinion
and has no evidence to tie this crime to radio or political ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. What an odd thing for him to say. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Shhh....
You're f'ing up the narrative. How can people validate their beliefs if you keep reminding them of this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Ok
But everything he says is the truth, so I don't understand why that statement would be considered odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. In his OPINION...
and in yours as well.

I'll help...

Belief = A feeling or guess based on your own biases and faith and hopes

Fact = Something not in dispute because evidence has shown otherwise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. I think you misunderstood
We agree on this. I should have noted my sarcasm.
During the height of the feeding frenzy, many here were saying he was being attacked for telling the truth (when he was giving his opinion).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Sorry bout that...
My sarcasm sensor was on it's last legs and this last weekend just fried it into a solid mass of molten plastic...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. He was out of high school for 4 years
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 04:31 PM by sunnystarr
How did this high school friend have any idea of what Jared Loughner did at home? Also Loughner registered to vote in 2006 when he would have been 18 and registered as an Independent. Obviously, as is often the case, he changed a lot in the last 4 years - including his cited deterioating mental state.

I just love how these high school acquaintences are coming out of the woodwork and I'll bet they know very little about Loughner.

On edit I was just thinking about my 18 year old grandson who is a high school senior. In his Freshman year he was a Republican. His Sophmore year he declared he was a Libertarian. Last year as a Junior he discovered Buddhism and philosophy. Now as a senior he thinks he's a Marxist. I figure in another year he'll see he's a Democrat. So when I hear about Loughner's high school "friends'" descriptions, I wonder how my grandson's friends would describe him. Guess it depends on which year he spoke to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. Why are they using HIGH SCHOOL FRIENDS ..when he is 22 and
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 04:34 PM by AsahinaKimi
Was in College??? My HS friends don't know crap about me now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
45. I'm just surprised he had friends,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Well, this had been a while ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC