Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Sarah Palin's Use Of The Term "Blood Libel" Offensive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:03 PM
Original message
Poll question: Was Sarah Palin's Use Of The Term "Blood Libel" Offensive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Needs A Line For 'Fuck Yes', Sir, But Yes Will Do For An Answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Pat Buchanan approves, really!
joshtpm Josh Marshall
HE SHOULD KNOW! Pat Buchanan says Palin saying 'blood libel' was 'excellent'. http://tpm.ly/fxXniL


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. He Would, Ma'am: After All, the Anti-Semite Is The New Jew....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. It actually sounds just like him. I wonder if he wrote it or coached it.
Maybe her writers read this column for style.

http://buchanan.org/blog/poisonous-politics-4591
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. You beat me to it, Sir. That was my first response as well...
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 05:26 PM by TygrBright
(meh, meant to be a reply to #1)

"Where's the 'F*** YES!' option?"

I was totally gobsmacked when I heard that came out of her vain, stupid, greedy mouth.

affirmatively,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Magistrate! What that other DUer said yesterday...you DO "still got it" LOL!
Poor grammar aside, I think you know what I'm saying. Well played, sir...well played.

:toast:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Ditto, Magistrate. I love ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. You crack me up sometimes
Glad to see you around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sarah Palin is offensive to me period
She could recite the lyrics to "Imagine" and it would piss me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LMAO!
I really am LOL to your comment! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. ROTFLMAO - I'm with you - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Offensive and in poor taste!
Had Rep. Giffords been African-American, how many would place bets "blood libel" wouldn't have been used but something like "lynch mob" or some derivative would have been used?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not offensive. STUPID!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where's the choice for: Do you find everything that comes out of Palins mouth offensive?
HELL YES! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarthaM Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sarah Palin's use of the entire English language is offensive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandySF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Delusions of grandeur. .
She equates her self-perceived persecution with the suffering Jews endured for thousands of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I find it offensive that I have
to share a gender with Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Anything 'snowbilly' says is offensive to me
I'm borrowing snowbilly from one of my fav's here, Dain Bamaged. I hope he doesn't mind :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obviously she lacks having any history knowledge to any extent as well
as she only seem to operate in a totally negative manner. She loses if the debate turns to an intellectual manner instead of the volatile diatribe it has been because that is the only way she knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick and Rec. This is a much more intelligent poll than mine--wish I had thought of this
question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zephie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Were Giffords not Jewish, then I don't think it would have been as big a deal
however seeing as the congresswoman is of the people who that exact bit of slander is aimed at, it is most certainly the wrong terminology to be using in this horrific time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Had I been familiar with the term I probably would have been offended and
assumed Palin's speechwriter (or Palin, if she wanted it used) understood the history of it.

Since I was unfamiliar with it it I wouldn't have noticed if it hadn't received so much attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. "profoundly ironic" "a deep self-judgment" "affirming exactly what her critics charge"


Jan 12, 2011
Rabbi: By 'blood libel' claim Palin admits 'words can be deadly'

...

"It's not just inappropriate, it's profoundly ironic. By making this comparison and playing Jew in the picture, the person endangered by a blood libel, she admits that the words people use can have deadly impact. By claiming that others' words are a blood libel that endangers her, she's at least admitting the prospect that claims her words endangered others could be true. I'm not giving her a free pass. It was a poor and hurtful analogy. But clearly, she's affirming exactly what her critics charge"
(-Rabbi Brad Hirschfield)

"... at some level, unconsciously, she feels guilty in some way for what has happened. But this is so painful at an unconscious level that she has disassociated and lashed out accusing others of what is a deep self-judgment. This is sad, as she is not responsible at all for the shootings in Arizona. She is simply, along with all of us who have created her, responsible for the coarsening of our public culture at a time when we are facing historic challenges that cut to the very core of what America will be in the next period of history."(-Rabbi Irwin Kula)

More:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/Religion/post/2011/01/sarah-palin-blood-libel-jews-giffords-killing/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. oops. Dupe. nt
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 04:26 PM by guruoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. yeah, but it's sort of like asking if a drop in the ocean is wet.
It is, but it hardly stands out more than the rest of the drops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Even before I read here what the phrase meant, I was offended
That Palin was trying to appear to be a victim rather than apologizing for agitating for violence. "Blood libel" sounded to me like an escalation of her rhetoric and claiming victim status.

Now that I know what it means I am completely flabbergasted that she would use it the way she did and appalled that she went there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Offensive AND ignorant, like all things Palin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. Looked up the term. I had never heard it
before and I am old. What a hideous choice of phrases. Bet she denies any "antisemitic" knowledge of the usage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes, but almost everything Sarah says is offensive.
This one goes quite a bit further, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. More amused than incensed. . .
To think, that such an intellectual lightweight aspires to the Presidency.

Even being generous, and assuming she didn't know the history of the term, for someone (anyone!) to use a term with which they are unfamiliar, and not make the effort to determine if they are using it correctly or even if it means what they intend, is quite hilarious to me. Especially when this person wants me to believe they're qualified to run some of my affairs.

And if she knew what it meant, and thought she'd get away with using such incendiary language in this day and age, well . . . I can only chuckle at stupidity of such monumental scale, and attribute it to deluded ravings of a true chucklehead.

So no. I wasn't offended by her use of a noxious term. It only served to better define her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Sounds like you are a nice person. She, on the other
hand, is such a lightweight stupid person that she causes evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. No one is more pro Israel than Palin


Jewish groups being up in arms about this tells me that even the tiniest of slights will be used as political fodder.

Sarah Palin, anti semetic? Oh, okay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Trying to "out Palin" Palin?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. What Does Israel Have To Do With Her Unfortunate Use Of Metaphors?
I don't think she's a Jew hater. I do think she's a cipher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I don't think you meant that question for me.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I Was Echoing What You Said.
What an idiot not to know her words would cause an uproar.

And it was a prepared speech and not an extemporaneous remark.

However I don't think she hates Jews. She's just an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Gotcha.
I agree she is an idiot. She should fire her Klansman speech writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I Don't Know Who Wrote The Speech
IMHO, the use of "blood libel" in this instance isn't anti-semitic. It's just totally inappropriate, insensitive, and just plain ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. You addressed the wrong person.
If not, your posts make no sense. I was not the one who invoked Israel, nor did I imply she was anti-Semitic or its use was anti-Semitic, I orginally said it was offensive and in poor taste. It is "pettypace" that thinks it is the Jews are making this a bigger issue than it needs to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. your response proves my point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. No, it proves your post is ignorant and conflates Jews with Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. Palin's religious world view foresees that during the 'End Times,'
only 144,000 Jews will be saved. Just what do you think is going to happen to the rest of the Jews? Hint: they are not going to be reincarnated as Buudha.

Palin is overtly pro-Israel, but covertly anti-semitic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Nobody Said She's A Jew Hater, Just An Insentitive Clod
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #39
53. So Jewish groups are ticked because she' s insensitive?
No one is arguing '5 colleges in 6 years' Sarah isn't the sharpest tool, it's the response that needs examining.

I'm 32 years old and read tons of history, and I've never heard of blood libel.

What percentage of the population recognizes the implication of that phrase? 10, 5 percent.

I mean how long has it been since that phrase has been relevant? decades, centures?

Geeeeeeeeez Louisse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Whatever, she's a TeaPubliKlan. They LOVE to hate Jews and weirdly be pro-Israel
Surely we aren't going to pretend this isn't another bizarre but prevalent idiosyncrasies among Reich wingers. I've know them by the ton that despise, ridicule, disparage, and curse Jewish people that will absofuckinloutely go berserk if one were to suggest holding back a weapons system to Israel.

I can't really explain it but it simply "is".

More than likely most of the anti-semites you've crossed paths with have been Reich wingers. There are some on the left, of course, but none of them hold the competing rabid support of the Jewish State.

Now, keep in mind that I'm not accusing fuckwit of being anti-semitic but rather that folks of her strip often hold such seemingly competing and exclusionary beliefs.

What ever rational notions a TeaPubliKlan scrapes out of life certainly do not translate in any observable way to their politics. Much of their ideology and apparent beliefs are either failed, absurd, illegal and morally repugnant, or like this a living oxymoron.

In any event, I can't get past her vain, martyr, diva, attack dog, and whatever else complex that would lead to such a choice of words enough to digest if she is one of the many TeaPubliKlans that falls in with that particular idiocy or not.

It doesn't matter her intent or content because if she opens her mouth or logs on to facebook or twitter something stupid, evil, and/or incomprehensible flies out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
52. Her faith believes that all Jews go to Hell, and that you need Israel for the 2nd coming


It is possible to want Israel to thrive, so they can rebuild their temple, and still consider Jewish persons to be inferior



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Kick and Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. Every thing she says is offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. I find Sarah Palin offensive, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. Up until this last statement I did not believe she had taken any real damage
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 05:26 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
with her followers. The misuse of the term Blood Libel may do some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Her followers expect and approve of this dog whistle, imo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. I think it'll make her more popular with some
Many of her followers like her, but think she's an Israel firster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. I'd like to hear some explanations of those 14 "No" votes .... really ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. I voted no
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 06:04 PM by quaker bill
because I have already reached the offense saturation point with Ms. Palin. Hearing more stupidity and insensitivity from that direction has become the norm. Very little she could say would shock and offend me anymore than the fact that anyone listens to her at all. People apparently still do listen to her and that fact alone conjures up all the offenedness I can manage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
47. Yes. Not for the anti-semitic angle,
But for the very fact that it was a thinly-veiled "Not my Fault" speech hidden inside a "Let's All Come Together" speech.


Sure, she will never win an election again, but she still raises money from idiots for idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
50. I voted yes...
but only because fuck yes wasn't an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
55. Offensive in its stupidity as well as just plain offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
56. I must admit ... I was not aware of this term
if one is speaking to a public audience .... you probably should make sure you are not using terms/ phrases that are offensive (whether unwittingly or not)... it's Palin ....so, who knows what her intention (or her speech writer's) intentions were ... regardless, now knowing the meaning, I think its offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
57. Palin, when faced with a big moment, showed that she could become even smaller. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
60. Not unlike Mel Gibson, we now know Sarah Palin hates Jews,
and that she smokes dried moose dung.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. Yes for two reasons.
One for being insensitive to Jewish people.

And two because her entire argument is total bullshit - asking for civil political discourse is not "blood libel".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC