Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mr President you stopped looking reasonable 6 months ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:37 PM
Original message
Mr President you stopped looking reasonable 6 months ago
now you just look weak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Magister Ludi Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. constructive criticism or pure vitriol? this is progressive???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. not facing the truth....is that progressive?
these is plenty of evidence that Americans want a leader who means something and stands for something.
They would rather vote for someone determined than someone reasonable.
You only need look at the last 30 years of voting history to see that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magister Ludi Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. How dare Obama not get into a protracted battle he can't win to prove a point?
How dare he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. no one asked for a protracted battle
I wanted him to talk to his constituents and answer our question
Truth of the matter is the sooner the better.
My first choice would have been on Labor Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magister Ludi Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. He will speak a day later. That is not good enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I'll watch him but many other people won't
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 09:12 PM by Fresh_Start
and since I don't need convincing its preaching to the choir which doesn't count for much.
I voted for reasonable people instead of obstinate people but I saw AMericans vote into office the other person.
Obama's lost his mojo and its not coming back so its time he started learning some skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magister Ludi Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. He will speak while millions wait in their living rooms for a football game
That is a guaranteed audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. If you think people wanting to see a football game are going to watch
the President that is a very big assumption. They will not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. FTW. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNinWB Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Looks weak to you.

To many, Obama is a pragmatic rationalist, not an ideologue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Six months ago?
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 08:50 PM by truedelphi
BP happened over a year ago, and he certainly didn't perform well on that. He let a foreign-owned Oil Company take charge of an operation that they screwed up. He ignored liberal reporters who took the time to go down to the Gulf and show everyone in America what a farce the clean up operations were.

He let the EPA, with his appointments in charge, approve a chemical called Corexit. Even though it was widely known throughout the industry that Corexit was not anywhere as good at removing oil from the water as a dozen other products were. And it was known throughout the industry to be dangerous to the health of marine life and humans.

His EPA studied Corexit for ONE WEEK, and then said it was safe. (You can take the time to view the vid in my sig line as to how appalling this EPA review of the chemical was.)

Now lo and behold, and we have a drought that is plaguing the same areas of the Southeast where the Corexit was sprayed. We have valuable Louisiana and Mississippi marshlands coated with oil, where normally many sea food varieties of life incubate. The damage is so extensive that the 40 percent of the nations fisheries will probably not be able to harvest fish that are healthy for anytime over the next decades.

And it's not like Obama has learned from this, he sees coal as a "Clean energy," Apparently he has no opinion about fracking for natural gas, and he approves of the tar sands of Canada.

That's his environmental record. And you certainly cannot offset it with his economic record, because that is even worse. Nine trillions to nineteen trillions (or more) swiped from our economy for the benefit of the Biggest BAnking Firms, while Paulson/Bernan cke/Geithner played favorites for their friends.

But those of us who understood early on what his approval of Paulson meant, and worse still, his appointing Tim Geithner to Treasury, got a very clear picture of the fact that these men are not working for Obama, he is in fact working for them and their friends.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree that it was longer than 6 months or shorter than 6 months
depending on an individuals perspective. As the strident left, it was longer ago.
For many people however it was the debt ceiling fiasco which brought it home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't really view the Democrats who voted for Obama from the bayous
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 09:06 PM by truedelphi
Of Louisiana and Mississippi as being strident left. But after the malfeasance of this Adminsitration, in letting BP systematically destroy the Gulf, they may be stridently left now.

I personally had problems with Obama all along. I had close acquaintances far wiser than me cluing me in to who Geitthner was. Who Bernanke was. But I kept telling myself, "At least if we have another Katrina style event, he will handle it very well."

I see BP oil spill as that Katrina style event. And he did nothing about it that makes sense. Don't believe me - believe the people that Spike Lee filmed for his documentary on the situation "If God is Willing and Da Creek Don't Rise."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm not in the gulf so the effectiveness/ineffectiveness
is less obvious to me especially since we have government agencies saying that the spill damage was far less than expected and things have been restored faster than expected...now I'm the suspicious sort and that seemed awfully convenient but I didn't know for a fact anything else.

Like you, I was a reluctant Obama voter because I didn't see anything under the rhetoric.
But to give him and Nancy credit, there was some positive movement in the first half of his term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. If you get a chance to watch Spike Lee's film,
Edited on Thu Sep-01-11 03:14 AM by truedelphi
You'll see that we are being lied to.

The Corexit was used primarily so that the gunky oil would be separated into microscopic elements. That way it sinks to the bottom of the Gulf, where the bottom feeders like shrimp eat it. Then the larger fish eat that. And then the bigger fish eat that.

So both the oil and the Corexit is in the food chain and will be there for a long time.

With the oil not being on the water's surface, than BP can go out and take films of the oil free surface of the Gulf waters and say "Look-ee here, everything's okay now."

And our government believes them. Or pretends to.

But those who are being affected by the death of the Gulf are pretty upset. This is where 40% of all the marine life in the USA that is used to feed us seafood lovers comes from.

Like Brad Pitt says, "I never believed in the death penalty, but after seeing what has come down on top of people, I am willing to think about it." (Not that anyone at BP will even get prison time, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thank you, truedelphi. Very well said.
Still hoping for change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Those horrid details regarding the Gulf oil spill...
I think I have tried to push them from my mind for the sake of my own sanity. It is so tragic that there is no going back for a re-do. Environmental matters seem to be of no real interest to Obama. There is just no passion there, and certainly no wisdom. :-(

He still could fire Geithner, who never seems to have given him even an ounce of good advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Fire him? For what he did?
I will always favor hanging Geithner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. He cannot fire Geithner.
Edited on Thu Sep-01-11 02:54 PM by truedelphi
Geithner was part of the package deal that he made with The Powers that Be, sometime during Fall of 2008.

Geithner does not work for Obama - Obama works for Geithner. He also works for all of Geithner's other buddies at Big Finance, Big Military, Big Oil, Big Insurance, Big Pharma and Big Pesticide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Yup!
Sadly, that's how it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. THANKS for this info about Corexit
it is certainly something you don't hear the media covering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. More like 7 years ago
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Weak as water. Weak as water. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. we'll have to revise that phrase
turns out water in its many forms is not very weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. He looks weak because he IS weak
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 10:15 PM by slay
he has no idea how - or no ability - to stand up to republicans,
or corporations,
or the big banks,
or wall street,
or the military industrial complex,
etc.. ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. My mom calls him Spaghetti. No spine, no strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Someone has a thread on why the the R's sabotage Obama
I wonder why Democrats sabotage him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNinWB Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. So he will be defeated by a TeaPublican.

Next question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. bwahahahahahaa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. He stopped looking weak 6 months ago...
Edited on Thu Sep-01-11 05:24 PM by Shagbark Hickory
Now he just looks like a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC