TygrBright
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-31-11 10:34 PM
Original message |
Obama just wanted to be sure everyone watched the GOP debate 9/7 |
|
It is, after all, the very best argument for voting Democratic next November.
Once again, brilliant and subtle strategy.
admiringly, Bright
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-31-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yep - I agree totally - he'll look like the adult after the 7th. |
CelticThunder
(460 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-31-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. right... he won't let a little thing like a jobs plan speech disturb the all-important repug debate |
|
Once again he shows his true priorities and his sense of urgency.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-31-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. What you think pugs are going to listen to his speech? |
CelticThunder
(460 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. This isn't about PUGS listening to his speech. It's about Obama bending over for 'em - AGAIN |
|
But I suspect you are well aware of that.
|
frazzled
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-31-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Actually, more people would have watched it if they'd have... |
|
bumped it up by 45 minutes or an hour to let the President speak first (which is what I understood NBC was willing to do). They'd have a whole nation tuned in, which would be a big segue into the debates.
As it stands, very few people but the already converted are going to watch it. People don't watch debates, frankly. Stupid move on the Republicans' part.
|
Brickbat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-31-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
4. So little of the general public watches these debates. It's laughable. |
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Right, so now he get walk all over the opening night kickoff for football season... |
placton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |
|
after all, it is OBAMA'S party debating, right?
|
Erose999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I think he's kinda bummed he wasn't invited to debate. He's the best candidate the GOP has to offer |
Romulox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 08:43 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Occam: scheduling was ineptitude. nt |
sofa king
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. I'm not sure Occam works in American politics. |
|
Consider virtually anything the Bush Administration said, 2001-2009. If one begins by assuming that anything they said was true, Occam would then lead one to an erroneous conclusion.
Because the simplest explanation for everything they said was that they were lying.
|
GeorgeGist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
Marnie
(706 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Ok so when does he stop playing childish games and |
|
get some health care, and jobs, and end the 2 or 3 wars he started and get us out of Bush's war, and protect SS and Medicare etc.
A tiny cheap childish victory?
Or an indication that he has no clue of how to do the hard things like dealing with military waste, and Wall Street greed, and the housing tsunami, and massive unemployment among the young, old and minorities.
Watch him and the great Pumpkin Head play their little boy ego games is disgusting. People are in anguish and they are trying to prove whose prepubescent prick is bigger.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message |