Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why couldn't she just say 'libel' if she really thinks she's being LIBELED

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:02 PM
Original message
Why couldn't she just say 'libel' if she really thinks she's being LIBELED
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 07:55 PM by K8-EEE
Why do they always have to stick in a little extra offense and violence? At the very least she's a DRAMA QUEEN. Not fit for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. She's into guns, violence, blood, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. It was a "dog whistle" to her Religious right-wing base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Exactamundo. She's speaking the language of the psychopath
I bet she was a "Goth" kid in high school.
Gloom and doom all the time with her. Never any hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. She wanted the "new" chosen people of the Tea Party to know what she meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's trying to please her followers by using violent imagery.
they eat it up. and sarah pac is probably making lots of money off of her choice of words as we speak.

"don't retreat, reload!"

"death panels"

"pals around with terrorists"

"blood libel"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well if there was EVER A TIME TO REFRAIN FROM THAT
Or rise above it, now is certainly it -- she just proved she can't do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Violent dog whistle.
She should be careful. These people listening to her are unstable. They will turn on her faster than one can blink an eye.

Then we will be talking for a week about unintended consequences.

I have been nervous about political rallies since the 2008 election season. I don't know that I will go to another one again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. She's claiming the mantle of the Tea Party as an oppressed people
A Blood libel is a calumny not of an individual, but of the entire Jewish community.

By implication she is claiming that:

1.- The massacre in Tucson did not happen
2.- The Tea Party is not responsible.

Otherwise, it does not make any sense to claim blood libel.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Libel is actually the wrong term...
Libel is for published works...SLANDER is verbal/spoken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh right, good point!!
Even worse then! I guess "blood slander" didn't have a scary enough ring, how about "death panel slander?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Her Department of Law says if she says it, then it's correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unlike Popeye, for Palin enuf is never enuf! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because she can't stop trying to incite hatred just like she can't stop breathing.
I hope this puts to rest the idea that the right wing doesn't do this on purpose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah it was like a test to see if there was anything else there
BESIDES the tacky rhetoric and apparently the answer is, NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because "blood libel" just *sounds* worse.
But she has no idea what it really means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
japple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I believe that, too. I think she truly doesn't have any idea what
she has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree she just was prob like "ooh blood libel, that's awesome!"
God people actually want this clueless fool to be the President of the US???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC