Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Solyndra says it did not have to warn its workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:37 AM
Original message
Solyndra says it did not have to warn its workers
Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer

Saturday, September 3, 2011


The abrupt collapse of solar company Solyndra on Wednesday came without warning - and without WARN, a state and federal law requiring advance notice of a large layoff or shutdown.

But the Fremont company most likely was exempt from notifying its 900 full-time and 200 contract workers ahead of time under a loophole in the law, officially known as the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Act.

"Because we were actively seeking funding and hoping to avoid this up until the last minute, we didn't file WARN until we knew (that shutdown was inevitable), which was pretty much simultaneous to the announcement," said Dave Miller, a Solyndra spokesman.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/02/BUJG1KVJ26.DTL

This was just a badly run company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They couldn't compete with Chinese government backed solar panels
I wonder when will Americans wake up to the Green revolution that is taken the rest of the globe by storm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. also sagging demand & a unique and expensive manufacturing process
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. They were producing very unusual solar panels
CIGS deposited on the ouside of one glass tube which was then inserted in another glass tube. The finished tubes were laid parallel in nonstandard size panels.

http://www.solyndra.com/technology-products/cylindrical-module/

Being privately held, there doesn't seem to be any publically available financial data on the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. So who is on the hook hor the $535 million dollar loan guarantee? Any idea
how much money the govt will lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well, its the .gov, so double the $535 M, add 20 M for legal fees.....sound right....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Taxpayers Rank Behind Solyndra Investors Under Obama Refinancing
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-03/taxypayers-rank-behind-solyndra-s-investors-under-obama-refinancing-deal.html

It looks like most will be unrecoverable by the Federal government, since the government money is subordinate to the $75 million put in by private investors last January. The liquidation value of Solyndra is unlikely to be very great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. If private companies are willing to accept public money than the should be
forced to open their books to the public. In situations like this do company owners profit in any way or are these situations simply a windfall for the banks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I doubt that any banks would be involved.
The private funding appears to be from venture funds and the George Kaiser Foundation, named after a politically connected individual. If any banks were involved, it would be an investment bank, rather than a commercial bank, and then trough its venture equity department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC