|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:37 PM Original message |
Pat Robertson calls Obama unqualified to be president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Tough darts, Pat. The only qualification is to get elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Pat robertson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muffin1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. If G-d really chooses to associate himself with the likes of Robertson and the rest of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Save me a seat on (under?) that bus to hell too! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Still a douchebag... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. How does Pat Robertson justify his own candidacy for the presidency in 1988? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
6. Pat Robertson is unqualified to speak about anything! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. A statement like this looks particularly silly ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mfcorey1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Robertson is unqualified to be a minister. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broderick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. Little late for that goofball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. Robertson unqualified to be human. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
12. Abraham Lincoln had no executive experience either... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dennis4868 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. not qualified? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. Any black man would be unqualified to Pat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Golden Raisin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. Unqualified primarily (no pun intended!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-06-11 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
16. Pat seems to have never read the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC