Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mitt Romney Compares Unions Making Campaign Donations to a 'Form of Corruption'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:32 PM
Original message
Mitt Romney Compares Unions Making Campaign Donations to a 'Form of Corruption'
Mitt Romney has come under fire for his statements saying that right-to-work laws should remain a state issue, even though, as he reiterated here during Sen. Jim DeMint's GOP Presidential Forum, he said that he would sign a national right-to-work law if it came across his desk as President. Romney has also previously had some praise for unions, making similar statements to the one here where he said "unions play an important role in our country." Apparently Romney doesn't think much of that role if you're either talking about government worker's unions, or heaven forbid unions being allowed to have any influence over our politicians and making campaign donations.

Jim DeMint explained what the Republican Party's real issue with unions being involved in our politics is with the way he framed this question to Mitt Romney -- they support Democratic politicians. And of course with all of the corporate money pouring into Republican campaign coffers these days after the Citizens United ruling, no one in the Republican Party wants to see anything remaining to balance that on the left.

Romney said he was concerned about anyone in union leadership being allowed to make decisions for their membership as to who they make campaign donations to, but he doesn't share that concern for the all of the workers in America of varying political affiliations that have their bosses and CEO's making decisions about which politicians to donate to, or that corporations being allowed to buy off our politicians might also be "almost like a form of corruption." No, that's just free speech in Romney-GOP world.

~snip~
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/mitt-romney-compares-unions-making-campaig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. but corporations - well, that's just DANDY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. EXACTLY!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tell me 'xacly how these guys are not fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. If unions shouldn't be able to make those decisions for their membership
then corporations shouldn't be able to make those decisions for their stockholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. or their employees as some have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. In what way have they made that decision for their employees?
Are they forcing employees to donate? How can that be legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Just one example but there's others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. my wife is the people chair of her afscme union.
the union can not give general membership dues to political candidates or to the people committee. a certain amount of the money is allocated from the people members who sign a card that their dues can be used for political purposes.

http://www.afscme.org/members/afscme-people

it will be interesting how the unions adapt to the new citizen united ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Since we own stock in hundreds of corporations via mutual funds, we should demand corporations
not give money to causes, pacs or politicians for the same reason. It's even worse than a union because we actually own part of the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exactly right.
If unions can't do it with money they've gotten from their members, then corporations shouldn't be able to do it with their stockholders' money. They shouldn't be able to use ANY of the corporation's assets for political purposes since the stockholders own it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Lying out of both sides of his mouth as he does is corruption too.
He should spontaneously combust for daring to even say that word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. but a buddy incorporating for the sole purpose of giving him a million dollars
is fine and dandy..."no harm...no foul"
these fuckers are unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. Look at what is behind the attack on Unions. Fear. Tonight
on The Last Word or The ED SHOW, they put up
a graphic which was a Message on Sarah Palins Website??

Anyway, the message was so obvious.

She was warning her followers not to listen to Union
Members like Hoffa. I could not believe it how
specific her message. They fear Union Message to
Working People. It is so obvious--stay ignorant
and support us.

It became obvious. They wanted Hoffa shunned
because they only want a bad image of Unions out
there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Uh-huh. And corprats buying politicians ISN'T? Typical Republican hypocrisy.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Unions need to figure out a way to become Corporations then they would be people?
Just remember Mitt is supposed to be one of the more rational GOP choices in the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC