edhopper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-11 01:18 PM
Original message |
|
So we all know that after the Titanic sank, they no longer allowed inadequate safety measures on ships. They needed enough life boats and other equipment. It was the logical and moral thing to do. But today after unregulated Wall Street sinks the economy, after an under regulated drill platform does untold damage to the coast, today's GOP cries for less regulation of the very things that caused the catastrophe. If they were around in 1905 they would have demanded that ships stop carrying life boats.
(I know there are many more examples.)
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Requiring ships to have lifeboats just means we have to compete with ships from other countries... |
|
... that can offer cheaper tickets by not having to pay for lifeboats!
:sarcasm:
|
Myrina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. ... and when the Titanic was going down, the rich were saved |
|
... and everyone else was left to drown. Some things never change.
|
RedCloud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-07-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Right when they drown Mr. O will say it was our fault and rescue his tormentors. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |