jpak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 10:46 PM by jpak
:shame:
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They were both there; there's at least two photos posted elsewhere in GD. nt |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 10:45 PM by blondeatlast
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
McCain and kyl were both there.
|
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
3. wrong, they were both there tonight. |
ejpoeta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. yes they were. i just saw a picture on another post that shows them both |
demmiblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Original message |
You didn't watch, then. n/t |
MrSlayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
GoCubsGo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:45 PM
Original message |
|
They were right behind the President.
|
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A row or two back but I saw them.
|
frazzled
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. McCain and Kyl were both there. |
|
I saw them. They were. Honest. There are pictures.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. The entire Arizona delegation was there |
|
McGramps wife was there as well.
|
virgogal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Where did you ge this information? I'd suggest a change. |
inna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
11. factuallly incorrect. |
Mark Maker
(168 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Can we be sure, based on your considered observation and |
|
extensive research, that this is the "settled science" on this issue?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |