Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Longshore Union Dock Workers Defy Obama Administration NLRB anti-union injunction. Protest Grows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:13 PM
Original message
Longshore Union Dock Workers Defy Obama Administration NLRB anti-union injunction. Protest Grows
Edited on Thu Sep-08-11 05:17 PM by Better Believe It
Washington State Longshore Workers Dump Scab Grain to Protect Jobs
Before dawn today, 500 people broke down terminal gates, prevented security guards from interfering, and cut the train’s brake lines.
by Evan Rohar and Jane Slaughter
September 8, 2011

The confrontation between West Coast longshore workers and an anti-union exporter exploded as pickets massed on railroad tracks by the hundreds yesterday to block grain shipments.

Police used clubs and pepper spray on protesters in Longview, Washington, as they made 19 arrests.

Ports in Washington shut down completely Thursday as hundreds of longshore workers rushed to Longview, in the state’s southwestern corner.

Defied Restraining Order

In a series of protests since July, ILWU members and supporters sat down on train tracks and occupied the new terminal, resulting in 100 arrests. As picketing continued, no trains had attempted to bring in grain shipments since July. But last week a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order at the request of the National Labor Relations Board, which said ILWU pickets had harassed EGT workers.

Please read the full article at:

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/09/08-6




ILWU President Bob McEllrath was detained by police as longshore workers massed on railroad tracks to stop a shipment of grain to a non-ILWU terminal. ILWU spokesman Craig Merrilees said, “When corporations and the government turn their backs on working families, it shouldn’t surprise anyone to see people step forward and try to fight back.”



A union worker blocks a grain train in Longview, Wash., Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2011. Longshoremen blocked the train as part of an escalating dispute about labor at the EGT grain terminal at the Port of Longview.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. How is an issue which is ILWU vs. IUOE "anti-union"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because it can be tied to the Obama administration, of course!
Anything Obama does is anti-union and evil, even when it favors unions. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. How is this favoring Unions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Because the IUOE
is trying to muscle in on the docks like the Teamsters once did. The longshoreman have a union contract with the Port of Longview to hire only ILWU members on its docks. The consortium EGT has grain storage facilities at the Port of Longview, but says it is not obliged to honor the contract (no surprise there). EGT is a foreign owned consortium. First, it tried to bring in non-union workers at greatly reduced wages and failed. Bringing in the IUOE was a secondary strategy. If EGT wins this fight, don't expect the IUOE to have a contract with them for long. They will be gone and the shippers will have set a precedent that will advance their cause of busting the ILWU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Thanks for this.
Very clear summary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Yes. Thanks for the information.

IUOE is not noted for being a militant union. This is more like a raid on the docks which the Longshore workers union has always represented and it's possible the IUOE officials are offering EGT a "sweetheart" contract in return for dues check-off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Thank you for the explanation. I had a feeling it was something
like that.

'First, it tried to bring in non-union workers at greatly reduced wages and failed. Bringing in the IUOE was a secondary strategy'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W_HAMILTON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Sulphurdunn...
...do you have a link stating where EGT tried to first bring in non-union workers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Initially, EGT violated
an understanding it had with the community of Longview to use local union construction labor to build the facility. Instead, it imported non-union labor from out of state where possible. After breaking off negotiations with ILWU, EGT hired a subcontractor to hire employees from the OEU Local 21 to replace the ILWU. These workers have a contract with the subcontractor, not with EGT. They are scabs, plain and simple. No union worker EVER crosses a picket line and remains one in anything but name only.

http://www.thestand.org/2011/09/heres-why-longshore-workers-are-so-angry/

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/july172011/ilwu-resists.php

http://www.icl-fi.org/english/wv/984/ilwu.html

http://www.longshoreshippingnews.com/2011/09/robert-mcellrath-ilwu-international-president-we-will-not-permit-egt-to-undermine-the-grain-export-industry/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. The issue is not between the unions. The issue is between EGT and it's union busting
activities.

IUOE workers, in this case, are scabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Because unions can scab just like people do. It's sad and disgusting, but it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Because IUOE is scabbing to break ILWU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That sums it up.
EGT wanted to bust a union, so it hired a bunch of scabs and threw them into a different union they could keep under their thumb. The old divide and conquer strategy.

Scabs get picked. Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. The OE have been described as "scabs"
by many of the west coast AFL-CIO councils. They've sided with management in this battle for the crumbs from the capitalist's tables, knowing that eventually the company will go to nonunion labor ENTIRELY.

A little more on this from a few weeks ago:

http://www.workerspower.net/ilwu-battling-back-on-longview-ports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Verrry interesting.
I smell a metaphorical fuse being lit. Wonder if the spark will catch....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kudos to Harry Bridges' union and legacy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. They should just bend over and take it because Perry would be worse!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. +1
People perceive very few options left when both parties have been bought and voting doesn't work anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. I beleive socialist_n-TN wrote an article about this a couple months ago.
I'll try and dig up the thread if he doesn't post it here fist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Apparently, contract obligations are only supposed to go one way
And we'll even see folks at DU applaud the port's union-busting efforts to take work and wages away from the workers and their union who negotiated the contract. Obligations are only for the little people; the bosses can break a contract and get backing from the NLRB, which is apparently still a little fuzzy on the concept of worker rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I am ready to go stand with them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. That's frickin' awesome!!!
Thanks for posting that.

Sums it up perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. I would K&R that cartoon if I could
Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. Just sent that to my dad, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. The same thing is happeneing RIGHT NOW in every discussion of the USPS
and I mean every discussion on DU about the USPS.

Just search; it's all there. As an employee in a distribution center (I get to do the heavy lifting, literally), I'm trying to combat it as best I can, but I'm only one voice and I can only do so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Update: Federal Judge Orders Longshore Workers to stop using militant tactics.
Judge warns Wash. union to halt illegal tactics
CBS News
September 8, 2011

A federal judge ordered union protesters to stop using illegal tactics Thursday as they battle for the right to work at a new grain terminal in Washington state.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Leighton issued a preliminary injunction to restrict union activity, saying there was no defense for the aggressive tactics used in recent days. Protesters twice blocked the pathway of a train carrying grain to the terminal at the Port of Longview on Wednesday, and early Thursday morning hundreds of them stormed the facility, overwhelmed guards, dumped grain and broke windows, police said.

The dispute halted work at four other Washington ports, including Seattle, on Thursday as hundreds of longshoremen refused to show up or walked off the job.

Leighton said he felt like a paper tiger because the International Longshore and Warehouse Union clearly ignored a temporary restraining order he issued last week with similar limits. He scheduled a hearing for next Thursday to determine whether the union should be held in civil contempt.

Read the full article at:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/08/national/main20103693.shtml



A man stands near railroad tracks while a train moves forward as a crowd of union workers and supporters gather at a crossing in Vancouver, Washington. Hundreds of Longshoremen were at the crossing as part of an escalating dispute about labor at the EGT grain terminal at the Port of Longview, Washington.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is like Atlas Shrugged in real life. Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. Obama Administration NLRB Intervenes To Stop Longshore Workers Union Strike Activity!
NLRB Investigates Longshoremen Union for Strike Gone Wrong
Fox News
September 9, 2011

.... in an unusual twist, the National Labor Relations Board succeeded in getting a federal judge to issue a preliminary injunction Thursday against further union activity at the Port of Longview after the union ignored the temporary restraining order that he issued a week earlier.

The agency will hold a hearing next month to determine whether further restrictions are warranted.

NLRB spokeswoman Nancy Cleeland said it was not common for the agency to take action against unions.

"In those cases where we do to court, the majority of petitions are against employers, but that simply reflects our cases," she told FoxNews.com. "The majority of charges filed with the NLRB are against employers."

Read the full article at:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/09/nlrb-investigates-longshoremen-union-for-strike-gone-wrong/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Finally.
Ladies and Gentleman, The Fox News Link.

Somehow I knew we would see it eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Everybody needs to understand that
EVERY ACTION THAT HELPS THE WORKING CLASS TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE EXPLOITERS WILL BE ILLEGAL! Period and end of story. So if you want to help the working class INSTEAD of the capitalists, prepare yourself to be "illegal". That's just the way of the world in our capitalist system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. the police should refuse to arrest the union workers
Police should follow WI lead and refuse to cross the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
35. The Longview longshore workers protest is grassroots in the tradition of the real Boston Tea Party

The Fighting Side of Me
Organized Labor’s Great Day at Longview
by DAVID MACARAY
September 9, 2011

Yesterday, September 8, a group of longshoremen estimated at between 500-1,000, all members of the ILWU (International Longshore and Warehouse Union), stormed the gates a Longview grain terminal (located in southwestern Washington state) to protest the company’s (EGT Development) anti-union policies. The ILWU insists that the EGT contract, along with the provisions of the Northwest Grainhandlers Agreement, guarantee ILWU representation.

After overwhelming Longview’s security guards, the longshoremen allegedly dumped grain, broke the windows of the guard shack, and severed the brake lines of several railroad cars. Police were called in and 19 arrests were made. Meanwhile, dockworkers in Seattle, Tacoma and Everett walked off their jobs in support of the Longview action.

The Longshoremen are understandably outraged. Besides the prospect of losing jobs that were promised to them, the ILWU is fearful of the long-term effects this audacious end-run could have. They fear that EGT will break the relatively weak IUOE (Local 701), and that after busting this union and coming away perceived as the victor (a la Ronald Reagan with PATCO), they will move against the ILWU, undermining contracts up and down the west coast.

And as for those upright, uptight citizens who will condemn the Longview demonstration as “lawless” or “renegade,” they need to recalibrate. They need to see this thing for what it is. The Longview uprising is self-determination personified. It’s American, it’s patriotic, it’s grassroots, and its antecedents can be traced back to the Boston Tea Party. The real Boston Tea Party. Indeed, Longview is what the so-called Tea Party movement wishes it were.

Please read the full article at:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/09/organized-labor%e2%80%99s-great-day-at-longview/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. SOLIDARITY WITH LABOR!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC