Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Congress Was Armed And Dangerous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:24 AM
Original message
When Congress Was Armed And Dangerous
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/12/opinion/12freeman.html?src=me&ref=general

THE announcement that Representatives Heath Shuler of North Carolina and Jason Chaffetz of Utah are planning to wear guns in their home districts has surprised many, but in fact the United States has had armed congressmen before. In the rough-and-tumble Congress of the 1830s, 1840s and 1850s, politicians regularly wore weapons on the House and Senate floors, and sometimes used them.

During one 1836 melee in the House, a witness observed representatives with “pistols in hand.” In a committee hearing that same year, one House member became so enraged at the testimony of a witness that he reached for his gun; when the terrified witness refused to return, he was brought before the House on a charge of contempt.

Perhaps most dramatic of all, during a debate in 1850, Senator Henry Foote of Mississippi pulled a pistol on Senator Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri. (Someone eventually took it from his hand.) Foote had decided in advance that if he felt threatened, he would grab his gun and run for the aisle in the hope that stray shots wouldn’t hit bystanders.

Most famously, in 1856, Representative Preston Brooks of South Carolina caned Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts on the Senate floor so brutally that Sumner had to be virtually carried from the chamber — and did not retake his seat for three years. Clearly, wielded with brute force, a cane could be a potent weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is a reason why they stopped wearing sidearms in congress. Stupid.
Don't the congressional security agencies need to monitor who is carrying at any given time in and around the capitol? Second amendment now-withstanding, don't the security agencies have responsibility and absolute authority with respect to security measures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. "I say we go back in there and nerve gas the whole fuckin' nest."

Vasquez: Okay. We have several canisters of CM-20. I say we go back in there and nerve gas the whole fuckin' nest.
Hicks: It's worth the try, but we don't know if that's gonna effect them.
Hudson: Let's just bug out and call it even, why are we talking about this for?
Ripley: I say we take off, and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Hudson: Fuckin' a.
Burke: Whoa, whoa wait a a minute. This place has a substantial dollar value attached to it.
Ripley: They can bill me.
Burke: Look. I know this is an emotional moment for all of us, okay I know that. But let's not make snap judgments, this is an important species we're dealing with, and I don't think that you or I has the right to arbitrarily exterminate them.
Ripley: Wrong.
Vasquez: Yeah, watch us. (Aliens, 1986)


I think we should listen to Vasquez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Vasquez was too namby pamby..
Ripley was the one to listen to. "I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure".

That works for so many things on so many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm with you...
I was hoping for a Ripley supporter to come along!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Most countries don't allow firearms in parliament for a reason:

(Fight in Taiwan parliament)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC