ProgressoDem
(145 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:27 PM
Original message |
The teabag reaction to Krugman is amazing. |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 07:23 PM by ProgressoDem
It's almost like he ruined 9/11 for them. EDIT for the link: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/the-years-of-shame/For reaction to Krugman, seriously just type Krugman into Twitter or Google News.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well, that was certainly informative. Any more than those 7 words, though? n/t |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Oh shit. He kept it real. |
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. that website is so far to the right as to get a scolding to you! |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I just posted what came up in a google search of recent stuff on Paul Krugman. |
|
And I think the link perfectly illustrates the point the OP makes. Have you read it?
Why would I deserve a scolding?
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Well, fine. I am happy it is there. Is there anything in response, tho, from OUR side? |
|
Just wondering, not arguing...
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Krugman has the unfortunate role of Cassandra in all this. |
|
He has been right...all the time. Get that, people. He said the early stimulus wasn't enough and it wasn't. He has been RIGHT.
Now he thinks the new stimulus (for wont of anything better) is OK . Let's get behind it and support it...
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. So you agree with Krugman? |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-11-11 06:49 PM by JVS
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yes, I most certainly do! I agree with everything I have read of his. |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. And you don't? Krugman says what everyone else has been scared shitless to say for the |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Krugman's not even talking about 9/11, he's talking about |
|
using 9/11 to invade Iraq. Don't let teabaggers get away with making it about dissing 9/11, argue back.They know damn well that he's not talking about the horrible events of the day.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
but seriously why would anytime be concerned about the views of those ignorant moronic ReTHUGS by any other name.
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Because they are firm believers in telling a lie often |
|
enough. If they aren't called on it, it tends to work in their favor.
|
Pisces
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message |
11. WHo gives a fuck what the teabaggers think or what makes them mad??? |
ProgressoDem
(145 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. I find it somewhat hilarious. |
|
I laugh so I don't cry ;.;
|
virgogal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-11-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Wht would you post something with no information? We are not |
|
robots that have spent the entire day doing the same thing.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message |