Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:00 AM
Original message |
Primary season: if not Obama, WHO? |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 04:01 AM by Smarmie Doofus
Not "a should he or shouldn't he be renominated" thread. ( That's been settled... to my satisfaction, anyway.)
Rather, a " Who could mount a serious renomination challenge?" thread.
|
Le Taz Hot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:37 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Unless he chooses not to run, |
|
there won't be a challenger within the party. The system is set up to ensure that.
|
Bobbieo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. The Repubs may have an answer to that problem! |
fasttense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:14 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I wonder if we could get Ross Perot to run again? |
|
He seemed to be the only one without stars in their eyes over the uber rich.
But he would have to pick a better VP. Though he could have picked a worse VP like McCain did.
|
Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
...among other things.....he's not a DEM, endorsed Bush Jr. in 2000 and Romney in 2008.
That'd be a tough sell in DEM primaries.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. It doesn't matter. He's not a politician. |
|
If there's one thing that ties DU together, it's the eternal dream of a politics-without-politicians.
In this season of the Virgin Birth, the dream is stronger than ever.
|
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:17 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Unfortunately she probably would never consider it. How sad there's such a lack of people with her high standards and principles to even consider.
|
Capitalocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Gave me a little rush to think about it... and now we're back in the real world. :/
|
Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. High standards and principles, yes. |
|
But a bit of a stretch. No elective office, limited ( i.e. narrow) experience. etc.
Also... she's an Obama appointee, no?
That'd make a primary challenge rather awkward.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Progressive politics is about feeling good. |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 08:30 AM by Davis_X_Machina
It's a form of self-expression. It's a form of social signaling to friends and neigbors who you are and what you feel and believe by your choice in consumer goods candidates.
She'd be perfect. Lack of record, etc. is irrelevant.
|
Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-16-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. As is *all* politics. |
|
>>>It's a form of self-expression. >>>>
As is "moderation". Come on now... doncha get just a little ego kick from being conscious of dealing with the "world as it IS"?
>>>>It's a form of social signaling to friends and neigbors who you are and what you feel and believe by your choice in consumer goods candidates.>>>
As is all politics. It's other things too, but it is indeed a public statement about one's self.
>>>She'd be perfect. Lack of record, etc. is irrelevant.>>>
Sure, but nuttier arguments have been made in defense of maintaining a failed status quo.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |