Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stochastic Terrorism: Triggering the shooters.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:12 PM
Original message
Stochastic Terrorism: Triggering the shooters.
(Thom is talking about this today.)

by G2geek
Mon Jan 10, 2011 at 05:37:39 PM PST

Stochastic terrorism is the use of mass communications to stir up random lone wolves to carry out violent or terrorist acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable.

This is what occurs when Bin Laden releases a video that stirs random extremists halfway around the globe to commit a bombing or shooting.

This is also the term for what Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, and others do. And this is what led directly and predictably to a number of cases of ideologically-motivated murder similar to the Tucson shootings.

Update: the mechanism spelled out.

(This update is to resolve some ambiguity.)

The person who actually plants the bomb or assassinates the public official is not the stochastic terrorist, they are the "missile" set in motion by the stochastic terrorist. The stochastic terrorist is the person who uses mass media as their means of setting those "missiles" in motion.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2011/1/10/934890/-Stochastic-Terrorism:-Triggering-the-shooters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm listening to Thom. The Beck tape
he has played several times is truly frightening. Beck's apocolypic speech is triggering the lone wolves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
57. I must point out-the pic of the guy...he has the SAME look in his eyes as
Beck.........it is so awful I had to block the view of him with my hand. He looks like Beck's son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariawr Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, they know what they are doing. Just evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I Was Just Going to Post This...
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. This is what Cenk was describing in his segment, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Thom Hartmann actually covered the definition of the word Stachostic Terrorism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yeah, I'm watching it now.
But in his segment, Cenk referred to "hate seeking missiles" iirc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Listening to Thom too.
We all have known about what is going on and how they are using advertising techniques to push our buttons. I mean Hitler wrote about how Americans and Brits did propaganda in "Mein Kampf", techniques he perfected and used in The Third Reich. but now we have a word for it. I never heard that before today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I hadn't, either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kudos to our own nadinbrznski for originally writing this - it's gone viral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Very well done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:20 PM
Original message
Thom read her post on the radio.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. cyber burp
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 03:20 PM by Cleita
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Thanks my own two seconds of fame
I was blushing when I heard it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Proud of you
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Didn't know it was originally your writing. KUDOS!!!
I'll try to spread it when I see the opportunity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Not on terrorism just on blood libel
and why it is not accidental
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #31
60. Kudos Nadine
I had already responded without reading this far.

Stochastic terrorism as a meme in the common consciousness and the media would be excellent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
52. I'm glad it has. Funny how the "personal responsibility" right wingers
have been so focused on absolving themselves, rather than urging their followers to calm down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Didn't have a name for it, but have known what they're up to for some time.
However, in their willful ignorance and hubris, the stochastic terrorists fail to realize they don't, in fact, have any real control over their missiles. The susceptibilities and mental instabilities of the missiles, so valuable in the grander scheme, also make them dangerous to all. Eventually, one of their own is going to become an unintended target.

The vitriol pumped out over our airwaves is meant to target Progressives, Liberals and Democrats, but how many of the listeners and viewers are only hearing "Politician", "Washington" or "Congress" in these messages?

The mentally ill don't always perceive reality as intended. Using them in this manner is a very dangerous game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I've come to the conclusion that a lot of people on the right
have no concept of relationship, so they literally don't understand society or how individual behavior doesn't occur in a vacuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. That Won't Matter to the People Who Put Them There
They'll just hire some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Much like releasing Abu Ghraib photos
Throw it out there...see what happens

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes. Just like that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't often disagree with Thom but I think he's missed the mark with this one. I
don't think Beck's and Palin's primary or secondary interests are to activate terrorists in order to carry out assassinations or violence. It is more simple than that. They are interested in 1) gathering together a political congregation of blind followers, donors, and faithful voters and 2) intimidating and/or smearing the opposition through words. It is terrorism...they are manipulating groups of people through hate, fear, and threats...but the actual violence or thwarted violence that inevitably occurs is simply collateral damage. It is not the goal. It is an acceptable price to pay for the political gain. In that respect, it's similar to the southern strategy in which the RW utilized (utilizes) racism to solidify their base, and the racism tag and alienation of a group is acceptable collateral damage. It is a simple calculation (and not unlike a car or cigarette manufacturer calculating costs associated with death or disease into the cost of doing business)

With these guys, the ends justify the means always. No road is too low.

My take on it might be even more heinous than Thom's....but I doubt assassination is the goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I don't think Thom was saying this was their primary motivation or goal.
He was more describing a process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. He was equating it with OBL...who clearly does wish to activate violence as a primary
consequence. I only heard about 3/4 of it so I'll say that Thom wasn't clear during the portion I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I only heard it with one ear
lol, so maybe I got it wrong.

He did say that was what bin Laden does -- apparently the term itself has been used to describe bin Laden by the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. They were definitely looking for the assassination of ideas
like, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The problem is they turned on a switch that made a crazy person take them literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Assassination of ideas and democracy, yes. I don't think the possibility of
crazy or fringe persons acting out was an over-riding problem. It is a manageable cost. Maybe it was arrogant to think that they could overcome accusations of incitement, but look at all the BS they've managed to convince the nation of over the last ten years. Is it arrogance or confidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Watch Hotel Rwanda
that is the most direct example of this in real life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. There's a reason why we should be calling Rush "Radio Rush-wanda". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Does it really matter what the goal is if the outcome is the same?
They had been warned many times what could happen.

Reminds me of the fire at The Station Night Club in Providence, RI. when the band Great White’s pyrotechnics ignited soundproofing foam around the stage and 100 lost their lives and 230 were injured. I think the courts decided that both the band & the club should have known of the danger.

Either way this vitriolic shit has got to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. I remember that. It's a good comparison.
And Palin et al should be even more aware than that band was because the band's main job was to play music, not influence people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. A long-distance version of what happened in the film "Bob Roberts".
Thank you very much for posting this. It's fully time to call out the US terrorists and to shame then into stopping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I remember feeling very upset when O'Loofa suggested Al Qaida bomb San Francisco.
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 03:19 PM by EFerrari
And his repeated calling Dr. Tiller "Tiller the baby Killer" was criminal, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. If the world was fair, I should be able to rec it twice.
Once for truth, once for geekness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. Do you see the red queen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. K&R.
A new class for high school students...I wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. 'Statistically predictable'
Exactly and then they have plausible deniability. If a Muslim radio talk show host were to engage in the kind of diatribe these righting lunatics spew over the airwaves every day, it would be an entirely different story. And seen for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. If Jim Zogby put targets on politicians, or made up an "enemies' list"
like O'Reilly did or suggested guns or bullets are a solution to political debates, he'd be under indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. K&R - this is exactly what the right wing is doing!
The more people hear about this, the better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
41. One person on Reddit described this as a form of Russian Roulette.
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 04:57 PM by backscatter712
Eventually, the odds catch up.

"Russian Roulette" sums up the concept behind stochastic terrorism very succinctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
42. On Thom's web site:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
44. K&R
Very insightful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hadn't heard this term before. Thanks for the information. Rec. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One Voice Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. K&R
Holy crap!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
47. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
48. I'm seriously considering putting together a video on this to put on Youtube.
Edited on Fri Jan-14-11 01:56 AM by backscatter712
This concept needs to be spread as widely as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
49. When she mentioned how men used to have dueling matches in this country, she went over the cliff.
Edited on Fri Jan-14-11 02:04 AM by Major Hogwash
I'm not exactly sure when dueling was outlawed, but I know they didn't have cameras, a 24/7 right wing tv channel and 1500 echo chamber radio stations to talk about it that night!

Mass communication is what made Sarah and the Tea Party famous, and it is going to be its undoing.
The longer they spew their radical attitudes on tv or radio, the goofier they look.

There has to be a "bottoming out" point for them.
And if this wasn't it, then I don't know what it's going to take for people to realize the coo-coos the Tea Party really is.
I think that by this summer, the media is going to have to be turned on its head and recreated, because this "Newspeak" crap that they have been engaging in for the last decade is ruining the dialog in this country.

How in the Sam Hell are normal people supposed to figure out who to vote for when the discussions are so far to the right that you have to wave the Bars and Stars and worship Southern Civil War Generals to be heard on the mainstream media?

Maybe President Obama ought to start out his State of the Union speech with "No, you lie" and look right at Rep Wilson when he says it.
Of course, President Obama won't do that.
He won't mention the 400% increase of death threats made to the President of the United States of America over the last 2 years in his speech.
He won't mention the historic number of filibusters (or threats of filibusters) that were the 111th Congress' legacy in the Senate.
Gawd, I hope they're proud of that.
Really, standing in the way of making any real progress must be a sure-fire method of getting reelected to the Senate.

We'll see.
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson of Texas announced that she is not running for reelection in 2012.
And I don't think Senator Mitch McConnell will be reelected now, considering his only agenda is to keep President Obama from being reelected.
Really?

Obama against McConnell?
It won't even be close.

I just hope that in this tight housing market that McConnell has picked out a place to move to by the end of next summer, and has his bags packed, because come January of 2013, he won't be in the Senate anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
50. K&R. Those Beck segments were eerie.
Whether he does them to increase his private wealth or shore up Republican power with the rest of the Fox troops, it is easy to understand how they could inflame the several right wing lunatics who have attacked perceived liberals in the past couple of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
51. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
53. k & r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
54. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
55. Addressing the root causes of violence
is crucial for the sanity of this country. The usual reductionist thinking, in an attempt to find resolution to traumatic situations, blame one type of person, one single factor in society, one issue is very common. How many times have we heard, "Oh he was a loner, he was mentally ill...." and the media/discussion moves on as if this explanation is of any help to anybody.

In the process of looking for answers we have to look at the whole system, we have to look for patterns, common denominators, and start working to eliminate them in society. This requires a paradigm shift not everyone is willing or capable of making. People want simple answers--fine. While finding answers, our country is full of toxic broadcasts, toxic movies, games, food, pesticides, groundwater, noise and machines everywhere emitting EMF like never before, and the Earth is going through changes.

We as a country and as human beings have choices to make about the world we live in right now. We can work toward addressing the CATALYSTS that cause the most damage to human beings, by working individually within our own circle of family and friends, and if able work in communities and on a larger scale.

Stochastic terrorism is a method of propaganda, this is an example of one toxic and very dangerous use of media, and one of the keys that has to be turned to free ourselves in order to create a healthy life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
56. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
58. First I hear the term, but the process about any damn idjit could figure out.
Too late to rec, so here's the kick.

"And it's high enough. Is it long enough? It's goooood."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
59. The concept of stochastic terrorism should be a meme.
Stochastic means probability.

Many are influenced, some prepare to act defensively a small minority concieves offensives, and some cross the line.

I like this term. Thanks EF. ;o)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
61. I knew there had to be a name for what all the inciters are doing.
Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
62. "Progressive Hunter"
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 01:44 AM by Oilwellian
Media Matters did an excellent piece on a missile Beck set in motion. Your article quotes:

The stochastic terrorist is the person who uses mass media to broadcast memes that incite unstable people to commit violent acts.

One or more unstable people responds to the incitement by becoming a lone wolf and committing a violent act. While their action may have been statistically predictable (e.g. "given the provocation, someone will probably do such-and-such"), the specific person and the specific act are not predictable (yet).

The stochastic terrorist then has plausible deniability: "Oh, it was just a lone nut, nobody could have predicted he would do that, and I'm not responsible for what people in my audience do."

The lone wolf who was the "missile" gets captured and sentenced to life in prison, while the stochastic terrorist keeps his prime time slot and goes on to incite more lone wolves.


Beck has a follower in jail for attempted mass murder.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoTpLr-mBLc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC