Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Archie Comics' gay wedding: Too political?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:15 PM
Original message
Archie Comics' gay wedding: Too political?

Archie Comics' gay wedding: Too political?
Kevin Keller is marrying Mr. Right, and some critics think that's very wrong

Same-sex marriage may only be lawful in six states, but it's perfectly legal in the fictional Riverdale of Archie fame. Earlier this week, Archie Comics announced that Kevin Keller, the series' first openly gay character (who was introduced in April 2010), would be getting married. After coming back to Riverdale as a war hero, Keller will marry "Mr. Right" in the January 4, 2012 issue. Is this a natural evolution for the classic comic, or does Archie harbor a "political agenda"?

This is needlessly political and divisive: "It's unfortunate that a comic book series usually seen as depicting innocent, all-American life is now being used to advance the sexual revolution," says the Family Research Council's Peter Spriggs, as quoted by Fox News. This brings an "obvious social and political agenda" to comics. Some may find the storyline novel, but it's likely to alienate more people than it pleases.
"Archie comics announces gay character will marry — will anyone object?"

Hold on. This is great: I "commend Archie Comics for including the diversity of our country in their publication," says Charlotte Robinson at Outtake Media. "Homophobes" may take issue and claim that the comic is no longer depicting "all-American life," but the truth is that gay marriage is a key element of the all-American life.
"Gay marriage planned in Riverdale"

http://theweek.com/article/index/219397/archie-comics-gay-wedding-too-political
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. usually seen as depicting innocent, all-American life is now being used to advance the sexual revolu
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:20 PM by Fire Walk With Me
Haven't they seen the Betty and Veronica comics? Someone recently posted a bikini cover here on the DU.

I don't know about sexual revolution, but sex sells? Sure. Meh.

Edit: And cheers to them for including a positive role model for whom things work out wonderfully. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Only if you think being gay is about sex
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 07:23 PM by Bluebear
And being gay has nothing to do with a "sex revolution"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. "or does Archie harbor a "political agenda"?
Sounds to me like Archie is the all American boy that believes in equal rights for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. gay people and gay relationships are part of "innocent, all-American life"
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:21 PM by fishwax
Screw the FRC and their biogoted agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Will anyone object?"
Hope only the FRC and their ilk will object.

Reality is that the kids who read Archie comics (and I was one) likely have some schoolmate or neighbor with same-sex parents. Having them understand that some families have two daddies or two mommies is a good thing, and that's not remotely political or sexual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought none of the characters ever made it ...
... out of high school. I guess he must have been somebody's older brother, or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not too long ago, Archie comics/characters were used to push a religious agenda
I don't know if the publishers were doing it themselves, or they were "hiring" out their characters. I remember one story where Archie and his pals were characters in the Old West. Not only did it advance a conservative Christian agenda, but there was also a veiled reference to "bussing" ruining the local schools.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think a more pressing question is...
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:46 PM by KansDem

http://www.comicsalliance.com/2010/04/22/archie-introduces-an-openly-gay-character-kevin-keller/

Why is Jughead still wearing that hat? :shrug:

edited to add website link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is a fucking cartoon for Dog's sake!
Some people need to find a hobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. They still make Archie comics?
I'm surprised that there are enough readers to keep it going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I've been surprised about that for almost 60 years
I remember being about five -- circa 1952 -- and looking at some of my older cousin's Archie comics, only because there was nothing more interesting to do at their house, and thinking, "Boy, these are silly. I hope I won't have to read them when I'm my cousin's age. But they're so dumb, they probably won't still be around by then."

And then I remember thinking in the 1960's, "Hey, the culture is changing really fast and a lot of the old stuff is getting really outdated. Maybe those stupid Archie comics will finally go away."

And then around the 1980's, I started noticing digest-sized Archie compilations at the supermarket check-out line and thinking hopefully, "If they're just repackaging the old stuff, maybe they've stopped publishing new ones."

In fact, for somebody who hasn't actually read an Archie comic since I was in elementary school, I've spent far too much of my adult life brooding about why they're still around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. 'The Flintstones' seen as documentary on early Christian life
by radical Christians

Be very afraid of comics.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I think that as a general tendency, comics do indeed...
...'push political agendas' -- but not in the 'Vote Liberal' or 'Vote Republican' sort of way, but by bringing the issues to the forefront and highlighting -- often both positively AND negatively -- the issues by illustrating them with characters that are otherwise well-known to the readers. I think they're important as an introduction to such things that a lot of kids might otherwise not have.

If one comic pushes an all-liberal or all-conservative agenda (and I'm sure there are, but none that I've ever read) then that's a failure of the artists/writers. But for comics to present both sides of an issue as an illustrative (and let reality (or in this case verisimilitude) -- which has a well-known liberal bias to begin with -- help the reader come to their own conclusions) makes them important in the overall schema of childhood imo. It's really no different than Star Trek and the Shatner/Nichols kiss -- was that 'pushing an agenda'? I don't think so. Was it highlighting something going on in modern reality? Damn right it was. Was it important? I think it was very important, especially to a lot of people who idolized Captain Kirk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC