Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Democratic Party is not ideological enough to deal with an

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:17 PM
Original message
The Democratic Party is not ideological enough to deal with an
ideological foe that is a my way or the highway party. That is my opinion after the last ten years. Democrats don't have a conviction strong enough. I say that as a Democrat. That may be a strength in times past but it is a definite weakness now. I cannot work within Reaganomics. I can't because it's core absolutes are false. I don't care how many people around me belong to its religion. I cannot act within nor accept a false paradigm.


How can we change this or is it even possible? Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm there with you, and I don't know if it's possible to change.
Too many are willing to accept an allegedly new status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. here ya go, the future of the Democratic Party once the appeasers get out of the way...
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/09/elizabeth-warren-class-warfare-video-/1?csp=34news

Elizabeth Warren knows how to counter repubs and they are already hating her for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thanks for that post - REAL Dems have no problem fighting...
...and know how to welcome the hatred. Good on her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. That is why I've worked so hard in the short time she has announced
her candidacy to get people to donate to her campaign. But she can't sit there on an island by herself. We need to get her some help in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rec
and kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. The problem I see is that Democrats in general (unlike Repugs) don' t have a killer
instinct. Not sure that I personally want one, but it is important to wining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Elizabeth Warren's sudden popularity marks the end of the Pretendocrats
America is finally thirsting for real Democrats, with convictions, spines, and mouths.

More Elizabeth Warrens will soon appear to meet demand. The Pretendocrats will be banished to Wall Street, the place they love best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. You do realize Warren is an unabashed fan of capitalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Me too.
We're just not fans of predatory capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Norman Goldman talked to Bill Richardson after one of the 2007 debates
He asked Richardson what the Democratic Party stood for. Richardson couldn't think of anything to say, and walked away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Are You Equating Being Ideological
with having a conviction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Probably not but a set of convictions? I think so.
A solitary conviction isn't an ideology but several start to form one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Any convictions enough to scrap Reaganomics or rightwing framing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. When the Democratic party made the decision
to start pursuing corporate money as the be-all and end-all of every policy decision, and when lobbyists became the arbiters of every decision, at that moment, the democratic party stopped representing workers and the poor. The party started representing corporations and the wealthy.

The party made a deliberate decision to try to take the wealthy contributors away from the republicans, and become the new right wing party. The right wing of the democratic party became the core of the democratic party, and deliberately made the left the unheard fringe.

A deal was made. The republicans will shout and create the pro-corporate ideas that scare most people. They will shout until people get used to hearing those ideas, and keep shouting until those ideas stop sounding so scary everyone has heard them repeated so often. The democratic party will then quietly push through those very same ideas, and convince people that somehow it was necessary. Somehow it was a compromise.

It will be classic misdirection, Good Cop, Bad Cop, keeping people from ever realizing that both partied are working together, not against each other the way we thing they are, and not working for us the way we think they should be. They're working for a system that is there to benefit the rich, and corporations.

We only get the occasional crumbs that they feel are necessary to keep us compliant and participating in the system as willing clients and consumers. We certainly aren't getting any of our rights back though. And we aren't getting a voice in any of the decisions that are getting made. Only a fool would be naive enough to think that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. I really think the problem is we're dealing with an influx of right-wing Democrats into the party.
They, of course, are going to conflict with left-wingers still in the party.

So when it comes time to agree to a policy or a certain set of actions, there is no agreement.

This is the perfect recipe for a party that looks weak or waffling. It can't even come to an internal consensus on how to move forward because it's truly divided on the inside, so how can it even be expected to fight a full-scale war against the Republicans when the party is still fighting within itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. "How can we change this..."
....with discipline....a heavy price should be extracted from any Democratic politician who wanders from the Democratic Partys' constituents and their core values....

....this could mean facing an organized 'primaring' from the Base.
....being considered a member 'not in good standing' and subsequently booted from the Party.
....DNC issues official Democratic Party memberships - then defends the Democratic brand aggressively in the courts keeping charlatans from using the Democratic label.
....Democratic brand users must sign a financial agreement with the DNC turning over all campaign contributions to the DNC to be allocated/re-allocated by the DNC as the Party sees fit.
....organized punishment using governmental bodies controlled by Democrats for wayward Democrats up to and including criminal investigations.

....we've got to put the fear of God in our politicians in order to distract them from all that easy corporate money....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC