Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The teabaggers like pictures...wonder if they'll like this...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 11:16 PM
Original message
The teabaggers like pictures...wonder if they'll like this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. It has words and numbers in it
Edited on Fri Sep-23-11 11:45 PM by jberryhill
And a picture of an atheist gay Muslim communist Kenyan on the left.

Reagan is way up high above those other guys, where he belongs.

I think that about sums up the cognitive ability of our friends on the right these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Now that was funny n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. LOL. I was going to make a joke but you've done it so well already.
I will simply add this:

:applause:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. lol Brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoosier Daddy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Yep, dat not a pikskur, dat a graff!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Beautifully Done, Sir
"It's funny because it's true...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. Now this they'll understand!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. LOL... I know, I just hate those atheist Muslims!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. True. Sad, but so very true.
:thumbsup: :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. reccomend...you nailed it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Physicist Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. on the left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Details, details....

Depends on which side you look at it from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was going to rec until...
...I realized there is no real data there. There is no zero or base. For instance, RR's huge increase is over what? Likewise in BS factor, I assume Obama's mere 13% is measured as above Bush's astronomical debt increase, which was compared to Clinton's modest increase. Point being, this is a worthless graph designed purely for Facebook and e-mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. From the day they were sworn in?
Oh and treasury is the origin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Interesting reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zax2me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Wait till you get a load of mine -
See below.
This chart from OP is either VERY outdated or a practical joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Get a load of this...
See this post where it is explained as percentages of the debt they were handed:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1994983&mesg_id=1995137

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Each Is Its Own Base, Sir
When Reagan was through, the country owed nearly three times as much as it did when he was sworn in.

When the elder Bush departed, the country owed half again as much as it had when he arrived.

When President Clinton left office, the country owed about a third more than it had when he took office.

The cowboy cretin left the country owing twice as much as it did when his regime began.

The country owes today about a sixth again what it owed when President Obama was inaugurated.

So, in broadly rounded figures, for every hundred dollars the country owed in 1980, it owed three hundred dollars in 1988; for every three hundred it owed in 1988, it owed four hundred fifty in 1992; for every four hundred fifty it owed in 1992, it owed six hundred in 2000; for every six hundred it owed in 2000, it owed twelve hundred in 2008; for every twelve hundred the country owed in 2008, it owes fourteen hundred today.

Thus, of the thirteen hundred percent increase overall, nine hundred fifty percent came under Republicans, with two thirds of that taking place under the last Bush regime, with three hundred fifty percent of it taking place under Democrats, with a bit over half of that, two hundred percent, taking place under President Obama. Not only has a far greater portion of the increase taken place under Republicans, the rate at which the debt is rising under President Obama is roughly equal to its rise under the last Bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wow.
Nicely done, Magistrate, well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It is Worth Pointing Out, Sir, The Chart Ends With April Last
Edited on Sat Sep-24-11 12:47 AM by The Magistrate
You could probably chalk up another hundred or so to this point. But the relative rates of increase are not changed by this. Since unemployment reduces revenues, and no steps have been taken to alter rates to increase revenue, while military expenditures remain the same as under the previous regime, and expenditures required by relief programs, such as food stamps and unemployment extensions and greater numbers eligible through poverty for Medicaide, are greater than previously, it is not surprising debt increases as before. But the cause of this is not 'overspending'; it is revenue shortfalls owing to economic contraction, and a toxic combination of political palsy and ideological fanaticism afflicting our government. Federal debt does not cause this contraction, nor does it sustain or prolong it; Federal debt is a product of the contraction, and a marker of its depth and longevity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. Nail on Head!
I was explaining that the other day and got blank stares. Using the "out of work family sitting around the kitchen table" analogy: Most would not only cut expenses but investigate new revenue sources. Begs the question, how does the Federal Government economics not really compare to family economics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Governments Create Money, Sir: Families Cannot
Comparing the finances of the one to the other is not even like comparing apples to oranges, but more like comparing a dandelion to a tractor. The shibboleth of inflation owing to government creation of money is in fact a mere paper tiger. Inflation is the result of increasing the supply of money over a proper balance with the existing supply of goods and services. Since it is these which constitute to real measure of value, not the money exchanged for them, if the supply of money increases faster than that of goods and services, each unit of money must necessarily be worth less. But in a situation where more goods and services are available than people have money to procure, an increase in the supply of money is necessary to bring things back into balance, by empowering potential demand. Government accomplishes this by taking on debt, and spending the borrowed money in ways that percolate through the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stumbler Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
51. Also consider:
the 'out of work family' doesn't have to spend ~40% of it's available expenditures on "defense." Or rather, most families don't have to, but this nation chooses too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louslobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. +1 n/t
Lou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Poor baby.
Doesn't understand using The Google. Or the Federal Register. Pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Physicist Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
49. Percent of GDP
Edited on Sat Sep-24-11 10:02 PM by A Physicist
Just create a chart using percent of GDP as the base because that normalization can't be spun.

Also break the chart up by attribution; some of the debt that appears under Obama is misattributed. For instance the $750 billion TARP is initiated by Bush AFTER he submitted his 2009 budget then it pops up (falsely) under Obama. There’s also the war costs kept off-the-books under Bush that go back on-the-books under Obama.

Some on the board don’t seem to understand objections being voiced. The object of the criticisms is to produce a debt comparison chart that cannot be legitimately criticized by wingnuts. Not to worry, Obama will still come out smelling like a rose in a properly constructed chart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zax2me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. National Debt Up $4 Trillion on Obama's Watch
Edited on Sat Sep-24-11 12:28 AM by Zax2me
snip - The Debt increased $4.9 trillion during President Bush's two terms.

The Administration has projected the National Debt will soar in Mr. Obama's fourth year in office to nearly $16.5-trillion in 2012.

You can take this chart and use it as bird cage lining - it isn't accurate - 4.9 trillion from little bush to Obama's 3 trillion from article, add another trillion from this up to date clock
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock
does not equal 115% to 16%
not to mention Obama's own projected debt explosion.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20019931-503544.html

Given these numbers, the BULK of Obama's debt still lies with former little bush regime. It was his policies that led to Obama's numbers.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. I think there's another way to look at rather than in dollar amounts like you have.
See this post where it is explained as percentages of the debt they were handed:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1994983&mesg_id=1995137

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. Try Using Fiscal Instead Of Calendar Years, Sir
The Bush regime is responsible for fiscal years running from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2009: the fiscal year running from October 1, 2000 to September 30, 2001, belongs to President Clinton's administration, and the first fiscal year for which President Obama is responsible did not commence until October 1, 2009.


At the start of the first fiscal year of the Bush regime (October 1, 2001), debt stood at five trillions, eight hundred ten billions.

At the end of the last fiscal year of the Bush regime (September 30, 2009), debt stood at eleven trillions, nine hundred twenty billions.

That is indeed an increase on the order one hundred fifteen percent, of six dollars of new debt added to every five dollars of existing debt.

Precise figures can be found here:

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. the facts... they burn.....!
Thanks for finding this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. WOW!?! It seriously bothers some folks here on DU...
Anytime someone post ANYTHING that might even hint of being good news about OUR President!

Is there a rule that once the campaign starts no one can post negative comments about the Democratic Candidate? If so, then once the campaign starts DU will be almost empty, huh? Or the Obama haters just a very load & active minority here on DU? Because it really does seem like 99% of DU literally hates President Obama! SAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
for truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Simple truth
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sweet This needs to be writ large in the sky over DC. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. St Ronnie
Still the Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. "Democracy is not the solution to our problems. Democracy is our problem."
That St. Ronnie ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. President "mourning in America" Raygun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Alas.... facts mean nothing to Teabaggers.
Edited on Sat Sep-24-11 03:58 PM by AlbertCat
They don't even understand what a "percentage" is.

Like some religion, it's all emotion, no intellect.


***************
on edit:


Whoa! I spoke too soon! Even DUers don't get it!

"the Magistrate" got it right.

Since the debt always goes up, it's a matter of how fast it rises within a time frame. This is what the graph shows.

The only real problem is that Obama's contribution is not over, like the past Presidents'. Their trends are completed, and his is ongoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. Thank You, Sir
It is the widespread muddle about this which makes it so easy to convince people lies are facts of the matter....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevStPatrick Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. That looks like a teabagger popularity poll...
"What percentage of the American people approve of each of the following presidents?"

Those are teabagger percentages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louslobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nice.....K&R and saved to my political graphs folder, thanks.
Lou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. If they do not I do. Thank you. Now tell me this mess is a Democratic
creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. To think that the GOP would like anything to do with reality or the truth
is a huge stretch of the imagination.

The GOP is the enemy of the truth. The enemy of equality. The enemy of the working class. They only fool the fools, themselves included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Presidentcokedupfratboy Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. The GOPologists would say
They have us beat 359% to 53%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thank you.
Edited on Sat Sep-24-11 05:43 PM by sfpcjock
...I was going to post the following for my friends on facebook, but maybe I'd better start with yours :)

Hey lookey, this GOP debate wordcloud just surfaced...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1998103&mesg_id=1998103
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
39. When will this a full page AD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
41. Don't you know...
It's not Republican presidents who are responsible for the debt...it's congress. Democratic presidents on the other hand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
44. There are several reasons this country is in the financial shithole we currently find ourselves in..
...one is named Raygun and two are named bush*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
52. I don't agree with this chart ...
I thought that Clinton lowered the national debt from %5.5T to $4.5T

And the 1st time that Obama raised the debt, the budget he
raised the debt against was signed by Bush in Oct, '08.
A full month before Obama was even elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxVietVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
54. Man, that will get their panties all bunched up.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC