Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama the Conservative: Check Obama's Record Against Bush's Record.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:13 PM
Original message
Obama the Conservative: Check Obama's Record Against Bush's Record.
www.obamatheconservative.com


Compare this to the Obama campaign's snarky "whatthefuckhasobamadone" nonsense. It's not about what he has done right--the minor tweaks to terrible policies--or what he's failed to do (i.e. give him time!) it's about what he has openly done wrong, the conservative policies he has openly embraced.

You can't be against the worst horrors of the Bush Administration's policies without being against the upholding and, in some cases, an exacerbation of those same policies.

Anyway, at least this website is an intelligent counter to the spin, insulting soundbites, and shallow talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. VERY K&R!
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 06:20 PM by FiveGoodMen
"You can't be against the worst horrors of the Bush Administration's policies without being against the upholding and, in some cases, an exacerbation of those same policies."

Indeed, we can't ... at least we sure shouldn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama has done more for women, the poor, LGBT community, seniors, etc. than Bush ever did
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 06:23 PM by Tx4obama

Obama’s 2008 Campaign Promises Kept:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/rulings/promise-kept/

Long partial LIST (with citation links) of what Obama has done: http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/what-has-obama-done-since-january-20-2009.html

Lists and graphs: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=433&topic_id=751914

We All Have a Choice in the 2012 Election
http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2011/09/03/we-all-have-a-choice-in-the-2012-election/

Short List of Progressive Achievements by The Obama Administration
http://shoqvalue.com/short-list-of-progressive-achievements-by-the-obama-administration

So That Ignorance Won't Be The Reason Why "Progressives" Are Throwing The President Under The Bus
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2011/09/so-that-ignorance-wont-be-reason-why.html

Obama Administration’s Achievements (Thus Far)
http://obamaachievements.org/list

Obama’s LGBT Chart LIST
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x777350

80 Reasons Why It’s Time To Take These Republican/Tea Party ‘Sons Of Bitches’ Down
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/09/06/80-reasons-why-its-time-to-take-these-republicantea-party-sons-of-bitches-down/


p.s. And yes I looked at YOUR list, but stopped at the GITMO section - President Obama is STILL working on closing GITMO,since your list got that one wrong there's no use in reading the rest since it is probably FULL of misinformation regarding the others.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. He's also done more for us than Hitler did. So fucking what?
He's marginally better than a Republican on my issues? Sorry I'm not backflipping that he gives me minor concessions to keep my vote while destroying the nation's civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. He's still working on closing Gitmo and I'm still working on world peace. Can I get credit now?
I mean, my intentions are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama has upheld the worst of the BushCo neocon policies
despite whatever 'good' things he might have done, they're negated by the numerous list of neocon policies he's embraced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. +1
at least some people are paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. thanks...
yeah, I know what you mean. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
61. Me too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. The very worst thing our Democratic President ever did was legitimize Bush's policies by...
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 06:37 PM by Poll_Blind
..continuing them.

That is simply the biggest smack in the face to me as a human being and as an American citizen after fighting 10 years of mothingfucking George W. Bush and all of his NeoCon fucking friends.

He didn't just let Bush off the hook, he was the only person in the world who could make the filthy Bush policies seem bipartisan. That's a swipe at everything the Democratic Party stands for and it attempts to wash away the most important differences between Democrats and Republicans when it comes to the rule of law and respect for the checks and balances in The Constitution.

And I'll admit it- I never in a million years would have expected that.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. it was the ultimate "low hanging fruit" -- now it's rotting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Rawstory:ACLU director says he’s ‘disgusted’ with Obama's policies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. "June 10th, 2010 "? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You know, the day after June 9th, 2010 and the day before June 11th, 2010
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. First President ever
to enforce a trade agreement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. And you have nothing to rebut except that stupid emoticon. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Human Rights First: Obama Praised for Action Plan to Prevent Mass Atrocities, Genocide
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 07:20 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Atlantic Wire: Obama's War on Whistle-Blowers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Um
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 06:52 PM by ProSense
"Obama's War on Whistle-Blowers"

...there is no such thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Rep. Conyers: Obama Demanded Social Security Cuts--Not GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

<...>

"safety net" opponents were signing pledges to protect tax breaks for millionaires and corporations. That is not fiscal responsibility. Our National Committee members understand this and, thankfully so does our President. The White House has given us a desperately needed reality check offering a deficit plan providing the common-sense balance most Americans know is necessary. President Obama has flatly rejected conservatives' calls to cut Social Security since this program did not create our deficit crisis. In fact, Social Security has a surplus of $2.6 trillion in its trust fund and can pay full benefits for at least 25 more years. Added to that good news is that the President will not recommend raising Medicare's eligibility age - safeguarding healthcare access for millions of future retirees.

<...>

The cheap spin and bs tactics to campaign against the President isn't going to work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Are you saying Conyers was lying?
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Another "There is no difference OP".
One has to look at the damage that Bush judicial appointees have wreaked to know that claim is pure bullshit. There is a difference and that difference is huge. President Obama has gotten more progressive legislation through than any democratic President since LBJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
54. No. A well-organized list of facts that Obama's partisans refuse to address.
Your emotions towards Obama and your insistence on how progressive he is will not convince me. I am convinced by Obama's actions, not your emotional appeals and dismissals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Unrec. Dumb fucking post...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I unrecced it, I never unrec. But the OP is pure bullshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. Please at least attempt to back your false accusation with a shred of evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
71. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. Agreed. Anyone who thinks that the
whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com web site is an actual part of the Obama campaign is someone very special indeed.

http://whatthefuckhasobamadonesofar.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Expect
the OP link to pop up over and over. The interesting thing is most of the sources are media reports and bloggers like Glenn Greenwald.

Media reports that aren't definitive tend to be inaccurate or at least incomplete.

Check the Social Security section on what makes Obama a conservative just like Bush. He appointed a commission and

OBAMA DID…

<...>

During the debt ceiling negotiations in the summer of 2011, Obama again proposed slashing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, as well as discontinuing a number of social programs — not merely as a compromise with the GOP, but because, in his own words, this would be “fair and balanced,” and because “we can’t afford (these programs) right now.” <217c><217d><217e>


Obama proposed "slashing" Social Security because it would be "fair and balanced"? When?

The entire statement is flawed, and this is listed under "OBAMA DID…"

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. This post is as honest as the oft-posted "List"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Hmmm?
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 08:51 PM by ProSense
"This post is as honest as the oft-posted 'List'"

Question: Did Obama propose slashing Social Security? Can someone provide a direct quote?

The list of the President's achievements isn't a bunch of quotes from media reports and bloggers. It isn't speculation and half truths.

Real actions, not people's opinions about what they thought he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. Rec from a voter in the State of Oregon
which counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
64. Yup, your rec counts as much as my unrec...
ain't democracy grand.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
47. Point out where the site is inaccurate. Or are you only capable of sound bites?
So you're arguing against the site? Because all my post does is agree with the site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Well
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 09:40 PM by ProSense
"Point out where the site is inaccurate. Or are you only capable of sound bites?"

...here.

You've taken the same speculative reports and twisted a statment by the President about "meaningful changes" to arrive at the conclusion that the President proposed "slashing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid" (no doubt meaning benefits).

As of today, there have been no cuts to Social Security, none proposed, and the savings proposed for Medicare are not cuts to benefits.

Still, how does this make Obama conservative and equivalent to Bush?

By that logic, Bush was equivalent to Clinton, who proposed cutting these programs in his health care package and spoke of these cuts explicitly. Obama hasn't proposed anything near to what Clinton proposed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
60. Also
rendition was a Clinton policy initiated before 9/11

Fact Sheet: Extraordinary Rendition


December 6, 2005

Beginning in the early 1990s and continuing to this day, the Central Intelligence Agency, together with other U.S. government agencies, has utilized an intelligence-gathering program involving the transfer of foreign nationals suspected of involvement in terrorism to detention and interrogation in countries where -- in the CIA's view -- federal and international legal safeguards do not apply. Suspects are detained and interrogated either by U.S. personnel at U.S.-run detention facilities outside U.S. sovereign territory or, alternatively, are handed over to the custody of foreign agents for interrogation. In both instances, interrogation methods are employed that do not comport with federal and internationally recognized standards. This program is commonly known as "extraordinary rendition."

The current policy traces its roots to the administration of former President Bill Clinton. Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, however, what had been a limited program expanded dramatically, with some experts estimating that 150 foreign nationals have been victims of rendition in the last few years alone. Foreign nationals suspected of terrorism have been transported to detention and interrogation facilities in Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, Diego Garcia, Afghanistan, Guantánamo, and elsewhere. In the words of former CIA agent Robert Baer: "If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria. If you want someone to disappear -- never to see them again -- you send them to Egypt."

<...>

This is another policy the President is working to correct. He reversed Bush's expansion of the program.

Again, does this mean Bush was only emulating Clinton? I know Clinton is a moderate, but was he just like Bush?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. That was fairly damning.
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 07:20 PM by bvar22
Quotes, Specifics, Policies, Facts.
Hard to argue with this.
The only avenue open is to attack the messenger,
change the subject,
or throw a Hissy Fit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. Ad hominem attacks are what they do. Obama partisans can't deal with facts.
Not those who are voting for him, but the forum leaders of his movement are a pretty vicious and irrational bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. This is so bad we may need Rick Warren to lead us in a moment of prayer
omg
Thanks for this link


'Obama has now indicted as many whistleblowers as all previous presidents combined.'

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Except
"'Obama has now indicted as many whistleblowers as all previous presidents combined.'"

...it's nonsensical spin related whistleblower cases launched by Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. That doesn't support your claim that the research is 'nonsensical spin'
maybe you meant to respond with a different blue link?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Here
"maybe you meant to respond with a different blue link?"

..."blue link."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Do you even read your own links?
I've bolded the key words that should have caught your attention

Advocate for Legislation to Reform and Expand Whistleblower Protections. Recently, Congress nearly enacted legislation that would eliminate loopholes in existing protections, provide protections for employees in the intelligence community, and create pilot programs to explore potential structural reforms in the remedial process. The Administration will continue to work with Congress to enact this legislation.

Explore utilization of Executive Branch Authority to Implement Reforms if Congress is Unwilling to Act. Statutory reform is preferable, but if Congress remains deadlocked, the Administration will explore options......


This is fail on a massive scale

As to your second link, that was a violation of Sarbanes-Oxley and unrelated to the OP's link.

I think you're overly tired. You work too hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Yes
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 09:14 PM by ProSense
Do you even read your own links?

I've bolded the key words that should have caught your attention

Advocate for Legislation to Reform and Expand Whistleblower Protections. Recently, Congress nearly enacted legislation that would eliminate loopholes in existing protections, provide protections for employees in the intelligence community, and create pilot programs to explore potential structural reforms in the remedial process. The Administration will continue to work with Congress to enact this legislation.

Explore utilization of Executive Branch Authority to Implement Reforms if Congress is Unwilling to Act. Statutory reform is preferable, but if Congress remains deadlocked, the Administration will explore options......


This is fail on a massive scale

As to your second link, that was a violation of Sarbanes-Oxley and unrelated to the OP's link.

I think you're overly tired. You work too hard


...I do read my own links. What I'm not seeing in your response or the highlighted words is a "war on whistleblowers."

SEC Opens Whistle-Blower Website as Dodd-Frank Program Begins

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. You need to take the time to read the entire link from the OP
It concerns executive orders and actual legislation

There's nothing wrong with your wanting to refute it, but you need citations of any/all reversals of Admin policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Hmmmm?
"You need to take the time to read the entire link from the OP"

What gives you the impression that I haven't read enough to spot most of the BS?

Obama's legislative accomplishments are nothing like Bush's, and to make that claim is preposterous.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Bank ordered to reinstate fired employee and pay $930,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. Thanks for posting this
it is so obvious when you look at his polices that he IS a republican - the usual kind, not the tea-party crazy kind. i'm glad you posted this so people can see, clearly, why i oppose Obama and do not consider him a democrat or a good leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
37. Interesting. It periodically updates.
I'll check it out deeper for accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
42. wow, that's pretty comprehensive. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. "WhatthefuckhasObamadone" is not affiliated with Obama's campaign in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. I'm totally sure it's not.
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 09:27 PM by readmoreoften
:eyes:

Or you're right. Maybe it's not. Maybe it's just a hack job by an obsessive fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. You certainly seemed to suggest it was:
Compare this to the Obama campaign's snarky "whatthefuckhasobamadone" nonsense.

But why do you assume it's "a hack job by an obsessive fan"? Don't you think that maybe, just maybe, someone has gathered and posted his actual accomplishments for everyone to see? Why does that make someone an "obsessive fan"?

I'm really sick of this attitude that *any* positive mention regarding Obama's record is automatically viewed as some sort of blind hero worship instead of a mature and balanced view. Meanwhile, the never-ending criticism, some of which is predicated upon either out-of-context statements, hyperbole, and sometimes just grade-A bullshit, is viewed as the only true viewpoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
53. K&R....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
56. Unreccing for the lack of a purpose. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Stating the obvious truth is it's own purpose, and a damned fine one.
Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Agreed.
It's one thing to be critical of Obama, but the last thing we need is the constant infighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
58. K&R - On virtually all major issues, he functions as a Republican.
We have all witnessed these things first-hand from Day One of his Presidency, but it is still extremely disturbing to see the compilation.

Thank you for posting this site.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
65. Who owns this website?
I would agree that the Obama supporters oft posted List is mostly filled with misleading info.

Dosnt stop me from wondering who owns this website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
court jester Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. who owns this website. ..
http://who.is/whois/obamatheconservative.com


Domain Name: OBAMATHECONSERVATIVE.COM

Created on..............: 2011-03-07 23:16:03 GMT
Expires on..............: 2012-03-07 23:16:03 GMT
Last modified on........: 2011-03-07 23:16:03 GMT

Registrant Info: (FAST-15283625)

Timothy Page
****** Ave
Evanston, Illinois 60202
United States
Phone: +1.847869****
Fax..:
Email: @siba.fi
Last modified: 2011-03-07 23:16:03 GMT

Administrative Info: (FAST-15283625)

Timothy Page
****** Ave
Evanston, Illinois 60202
United States
Phone: +1.847869****
Fax..:
Email: @siba.fi
Last modified: 2011-03-07 23:16:03 GMT

Technical Info: (FAST-12785240)
Bluehost.com
Bluehost Inc
1958 South 950 East
Provo, Utah 84604
United States
Phone: +1.8017659400
Fax..: +1.8017651992
Email: @bluehost.com
Last modified: 2010-12-06 18:43:32 GMT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
66. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
67. Unrec'd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
68. Gabbage. -1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
70. Kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
72. blatant anti-dem campaigning on DU reaches new pathetic lows.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Always the same crows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
73. Let's not forget Obama's escalation of the War on Drugs!
K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC