LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:19 PM
Original message |
Ralph Nader Hearts Ron Paul, Hails Potential Left-Libertarian Alliance |
|
http://reason.com/blog/2011/09/28/ralph-nader-hearts-ron-paul-haPlease note: Reason is a libertarian source, and I use them as a hostile witness against Ralph Nader's strategy and tactics.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If Nader or Paul are threats to Obama, things are worse than we thought n/t |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. Anyone who takes away any progressive votes helps to throw the election. |
|
Nader threw Florida to Bush, and that cost Gore the election. It could easily happen again that Obama wins the popular vote, but Nader or someone like him could siphon off enough votes in a swing state to again throw the election to the Rethug.
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
19. If Nader in aligns himself with Paul he's more of a power crazed loser-weasel |
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. If Obama's progressive how could he lose progressive votes? |
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. Perhaps because "progressive" websites run around repeating lies and propaganda? |
|
Because there's a very well funded effort to convince people that Obama isn't on our side?
|
LooseWilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
33. Who, praytell, is "funding an effort" to convince the Left that Obama isn't on "our" side? |
|
The Koch brothers?
The furry freak brothers?
The brothers Karamozov?
I am personally convinced that Obama isn't on my side... who paid for my brainwashing?
(Inquiring minds want to know...)
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
38. Nader is helping to convince people, just as he did in 2000. n/t |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
37. Gore is progressive and he lost progressive votes to Nader, |
|
whose lie was that Gore and Bush were the same and it wouldn't matter which one of them was elected.
Would Gore have started the war in Iraq? Would Gore have worked for the environment? Would Gore have ignored for four days the suffering of the people in NOLA?
|
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
KamaAina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Alternate headline: Fake Lefty Nader Hooks Up With Racist, Anti-Choice Pig |
patrick t. cakes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
31. that'll never make print |
Hassin Bin Sober
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I look forward to these threads. I miss the crazy old man on my block who would yell at his shrubs. |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I miss the guy who would think the joke is still funny the second time he told it. n/t |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
23. Right, because you know what is right and wrong. |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I miss the guy who would think the joke is still funny the second time he told it. n/t |
sethgrogen
(83 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Hassin Bin Sober
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. LOL. You can say that again! |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
griffi94
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that nader was such a threat. lol
|
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Many of the people now flocking to Ron Paul have never been libertarians. |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 10:48 PM by woo me with science
and don't need to be libertarians.
They are Americans who are desperate and angry that both major parties have abandoned them in order to fellate the banks and fund the wars. They are looking for a candidate, any candidate, who will begin to reverse this path toward their impoverishment and devastation. Many are flocking to him because he is the ONLY candidate talking about ending the wars and auditing/holding the banks accountable.
Most of his new supporters are probably not hardcore libertarians at all. Many are willing to overlook the scarier aspects of Paul's libertarianism solely because of these two momentous issues. They are trying to send a message about their utter frustration with the two major parties.
Yes, Paul's supporters include a core of hardcore libertarians who hate all government. But his candidacy is growing now precisely because times are so desperate and people are looking for any candidate who will promise major change in these areas.
These people are potential Democrats, if only the Democratic Party would offer them something.
Where is our Democratic candidate who will curtail the warmongering? Where is our Democratic candidate who will hold the banks accountable?
Don't insult Paul supporters. Reach out to them. And call, write, protest, and push Democrats to act like Democrats....because right now, this party is looking like Republican II.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
My nightmare scenario is Ron Paul running as am independent. He could very well win, for the reasons you stated.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Earth to Nader: he's not on our side. |
|
Paul's not on our side on unions. He's not on our side about Social Security. He's not on our side about Medicare. He's not on our side about public health care. He's not on our side about public education. He's not on our side about the environment. He's not on our side about women's choice.
Although maybe Paul and Nader really are on the side same . . . which would explain why Nader helped throw the election to the Rethugs in 2000.
|
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. I threw out an idea about stopping the Nader posts, but it didn't seem like people were interested. |
Hassin Bin Sober
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I'd rather he do this than knock on doors for Obama. |
Electric Monk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
34. Good point. He does not seem to help the causes he 'advocates' for much, does he? |
Fuddnik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
Kurmudgeon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Nader is turning into quite the Lieberman. Maybe he can even cost the Dems another election. |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 11:36 PM by Kurmudgeon
Won't that be fun???
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-28-11 11:42 PM
Response to Original message |
22. The consumer advocate and the guy who hates any/all regulation |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 12:42 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Were you upset when Obama's education Secretary teamed up with Newt Gingrich? |
|
http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/on-education/2009/08/17/arne-duncan-al-sharpton-and-newt-gingrich-join-forces"In an effort to push cities to fix failing schools and highlight the Obama administration's programs to reform public education, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and civil rights leader Al Sharpton will join Education Secretary Arne Duncan on a tour of cities later this year." Or was that just "politics".
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
It's Okay If Obama Does It.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
26. The problem is is when so few people are right and speak out on the issues that Paul is right on.... |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-29-11 12:58 AM by FLAprogressive
....people tend to ignore all the other crazy shit.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 01:12 AM
Response to Original message |
28. Nader must have some good health insurance. |
|
That would explain why he's OK with the whole "let him die" thing.
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 01:17 AM
Response to Original message |
29. You don't really know what "hostile witness" means do you? |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
35. Maybe not; if you know of a better phrase for someone who says something that |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-29-11 09:48 AM by LoZoccolo
helps your case while testifying for the other side, let me know.
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 01:52 AM
Response to Original message |
30. Of Course he does. Nader is an asshole. n/t |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 02:13 AM
Response to Original message |
32. If "libertarians are just republicans who smoke pot, HYUK", does that mean folks will finally admit |
|
that Nader is a Republican?
|
Hoosier Daddy
(271 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-29-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |