Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tulsa to evict 70 renters due to landlord's unpaid water bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:16 AM
Original message
Tulsa to evict 70 renters due to landlord's unpaid water bill
Source: KOTV

Dozens of Tulsa families are about to be homeless for the holidays. The owner of an East Tulsa complex has not paid a $79,000 water bill, but it's the residents who will pay the price.

Residents at the Somerset Apartments were told Wednesday that their water will be shut off Thursday and they will have ten days to get out.

... Everyone who lives in the 70 occupied apartments at Somerset is in the same boat. The owner, who lives in California, has not paid a $79,000 water bill, so the city is shutting it off Thursday.

Residents won't have their deposit, or even this month's rent, returned.

Read more: http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=13681377
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. that is just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Now, that is just effing ridiculous
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 10:20 AM by NV Whino
There have to be other solutions. And why did they let the bill get to $79,000 before doing anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. wow apparenty Tulsa does not have 'tenants remedies'
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 10:22 AM by azurnoir
in Minneapolis if a landlord is enough behind to get any utility that he pays for shut off the notices go both to the landlord and to the tenants who then have the legal option of paying their rent to the utility company in question and that is put towards to stop the shut off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. of course not
Before I bought my house I rented enough flops around Tulsa to know that all the cards are stacked in the landlord's favor here. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. well other than that the cards are stacked for the landlord
such as a landlords claims are always taken as truth in court the burden of truth is on tenant years ago I had a landlord claim that I had not paid rent in a year! He had always demanded the rent in cash so I made him give a receipt always, of course he never had a receipt book so some of them were literally in crayola on a torn out page of a coloring book, but thankfully the guy had a reputation for pulling that crap on people, so the judge quite happily accepted them the landlord was flipping HUD properties buying them at auction for cheap then mortgaging them for big bucks and defaulting on the mortgage, last I heard years ago he was on trial in federal court for equity skimming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's one thing I like about Boston
It's very hard for a landlord to win a lawsuit. Two landlords I know don't even take security deposits because it presents the landlords with huge possible liabilities (everything in a landlord/tenant dispute is triple damages).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. This happened at a Condo complex last year. Have to find the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. That is wrong in so many many ways!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. SC has dumbass laws like this, that punish the tenants when it's the landlord who was the wrongdoer.

Red states are like that.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC