Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Is Glaringly Wrong With This Picture?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:22 PM
Original message
What Is Glaringly Wrong With This Picture?


Source: MoveOn.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. We can't see the tall dudes head?

:sarcasm:

The chart makes you sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bank of America CEO from the looks of it.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
42. Naw, it would be a picture of a big dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. His head is there somewhere.
But what he maybe needs is a guilliotine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bengalherder Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
53. The Procrustian Graph, LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. I blame the Queen of Hearts.
2. Of or pertaining to Procrustes, or the mode of torture practiced by him; producing conformity by violent means; as, the Procrustean treatment; a Procrustean limit


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. all mgmt and CEO types are tall... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
58. Tall tales.
Edited on Sat Oct-01-11 01:05 PM by Kurovski
Full of them.

Also see: Shit.

One nice thing about making it to the top is that you no longer are taxed with the chore of providing prostitutes for purposes of landing the sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. We mere mortals are only fit to kiss his a** /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I could throw up.
Everything is wrong with it. We are back to the Gilded Age and we have to fight the same fights over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. We didn't all choose to be hedge fund managers?
If only more people had the belly to be robber barons with the moral compass of a mercenary, we'd have a dream society!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Clearly, the rest of us opted to be "failed Americans." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkdu Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Scale is all wrong.......if the heights of the individuals were truely to
scale ...we would only see the shit on the bottom of the hedge-fund managers shoes.

/sarc off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Really disgusting.
I'm reminded of this quote from Fight Club that describes it perfectly:

"Look the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals. We collect your calls. We haul your trash. We guard you while you sleep. Do not fuck with us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. How come the IRS site says the hedge fund manager salary is in the 35% bracket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think the vast majority of a hedge fund manager's income comes from something
similar to capital gains, which is taxed at 15%.

The salary is pennies in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Oh, sorry
I couldn't read the fine print at the bottom and thought they were talking about income brackets.

So what's the excuse they use for firefighters, teachers, policemen and doctors having to pay 25% and 28% capital gains tax, but hedge fund managers only having to pay 15% on their capital gains?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Dunno. I'm not well-versed in all that. I just remember hearing something along
those lines on NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yeah, me either - thanks for the info though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The current Meme is that those hedge fund managers
Are the "Job Creators."

And if we tax the "Job Creators," then the entire economy will fail overnight...never mind the fact that it already failed.

IMO, it shows that our priorities are skewed. We worship successful criminals instead of the people that make our lives possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So we have to tax the capital gains of hedge fund managers
less than we tax the capital gains of everybody else, or the entire economy will fail overnight?
I don't care if they pay a higher tax bracket on income, taxing them less than others on capital gains is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. The Meme is that it's any kind of "tax increase"
It's Ronald Reagan's failed "Trickle down" theory. If we don't let them keep as much of their well earned(stolen) money, then they won't reinvest and buy more yachts and houses and caviar...which in turn means the little people like us won't have jobs because no one will buy anything or invest in companies.

It's pretty pretzel logic, but what other logic do you ever get from Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Fund managers carved out their own tax loophole called "carried interest."
Edited on Sat Oct-01-11 12:22 AM by subterranean
They invest other people's money and keep a share of whatever profits they make. That share is classified as "carried interest," and if the fund's investments are held long enough, it can be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate of 15%, even if the manager did not risk any of his own capital. That's how a hedge fund manager like John Paulson can make billions and pay a lower tax rate than a cop or a teacher.

More details:
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2010/03/15/100315ta_talk_surowiecki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True Earthling Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
47. Exactly... even though they have no capital of their own invested...
they pay the capital gains rate of 15% on the fees they charge for their labor...

http://www.epi.org/publication/pm120/

Tax treatment distorts economic incentives
There are two things economically wrong with this special tax provision for hedge fund managers. First is its impact on economic efficiency. It creates inconsistent economic incentives (i.e., distortions) for some labor income to be treated as ordinary income while other labor income is treated as capital gains, and the work done by investment advisors is undeniably a professional, laboring activity.1 Fund managers at pension funds, trusts, and endowments who provide similar professional services are paid a salary and possibly a bonus, and these are all treated as ordinary income. Only because hedge funds and private equity firms are organized as limited liability partnerships—which are already treated favorably for tax and liability purposes—are these same professional services taxed differently. The result is a distortion in the compensation and after-tax income between these super rich hedge fund managers and millions of others in the workforce.

The second thing wrong with this exemption is that these super rich fund managers do not need and certainly do not deserve special tax breaks. Alpha Magazine reports the compensation for hedge fund managers each year. The top earner for 2006 received $1.7 billion, the second highest received $1.4 billion, and the third $1.3 billion. That adds to $4.4 billion for three people. The top 25 hedge managers received, on average, $570 million for a total of $14.25 billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. Capital gains are from profits on investments, supposedly.
So, the theory goes, if you lower taxes on investment profits, you'll get more investments in business, and thus more jobs and stuff.


Of course, it's proven bullshit... it's an incentive for the owners of companies to pull money OUT of the business because the tax rate is so low! And buying used stock and real estate isn't helping business hardly at all.


But money is free speech, so the wealthy have the ear of the legislators.


Besides, firefighters, teachers, and policemen are UNIONIZED, and by definition overpaid and over-protected and EVIL!!!!!! So we have to tax them! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. the graph is talking about income
The teachers, firefighters, police, and doctors are paying that tax on their salaries, not on their capital gains. Whatever capital gains they had would be taxed at a lower rate, either 0%, 5% or 15%. My own capital gain was taxed at 0%. But capital gains are not typically a large portion of their, or my, income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. teachers, firefighters, police, and doctors and the rest of us
pay property taxes, sales taxes, all kinds of taxes. Personally, I think that capital gains on sales of assets held less than say 10 years -- not just one year -- should be taxed as income -- same rate.

That would encourage more stability and discourage a lot of speculation in certain kinds of markets such as real estate or certain stocks.

http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc409.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
52. Taxing income as capital gains is pure cockamamie bullshit, compliments of a
corrupt and venal Congress and successive administrations. It is pure de sucking at the government welfare teat by a government that would rather gut social security and Medicare benefits rather than impose a fair and equitable income tax on hedge fund managers and their ilk. Refutation invited. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. What is glaringly wrong to me is that while 4 people's tax rates are shown...
the 5th gets a bar that states "as low as..".

To be a fair comparison, they all should have their tax rates shown, or they all should have their potential lowest tax rates shown. No apples and oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHeThinks Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. That stuck out to me as well......
if we're ever going to convince Mr. and Mrs. Middle America that they're being royally screwed we can't leave a glaring hole like that in the argument for the right-wing to exploit. There are enough instances of class warfare available that have irrefutable evidence. We shouldn't leave the right-wing an inch of room to maneuver , and that's exactly what that chart does. "As low as" for one should be "as low as" for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
48. I personally love when Democrats protect the uber-rich
Warms the cockles on my hearts. Teachers, first responders, and working class? Nope. Hedge fund managers...hang on Timmy, we'll be right there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Only the little people play taxes" - Leona Helmsley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. ...of course you mean... pay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. oops
yes you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Those that serve the people pay the most
Those that do the least, pay the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Several of our friends who were in sales have been switched from an
employee to an "independent contractor" by their employers.

Big savings for the corporation: they no longer have to pay their share of Social Security and Medicare taxes and they also no longer pay for ANY benefits like retirement plans and health insurance.

The former employees get screwed big time because they have to pay the full 15% self-employment tax, pay for their own health insurance and fund their retirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
38. I don't know whether the law has been changed, but this
re-categorizing an employee as an independent contractor can backfire in California if the employer has not made sure that the employee really meets the legal test for an independent contractor.

This problem arises when the employee is injured on the job and needs Worker's Compensation insurance benefits. It can also be a problem if the employer is not following overtime laws. Those are just a couple of the traps for the unwary employer.

The term "independent contractor" actually means something or at least used to in California.

An employer (or employee) should check with a lawyer to be sure that he or she is complying with the law on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Sprat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. The trickle is missing. So are the unemployed
who were supposed to get trickled down on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R Also...
Tax policy is only one aspect of the story, albeit an important one. The rules of the road funnel money toward the top even before Uncle Sam (or your state government) takes their cut. Dean Baker's new book (available to download for free, by the way) very nicely explains a few things about all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. You really oughtta post the link to it if it's handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. d'oh!
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 10:51 PM by PETRUS
You can find it here:

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/books/the-end-of-loser-liberalism

I don't know if I agree with his prescriptions (when he offers them), but it contains excellent information about the policies the ruling elites use to tilt the playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. They're faceless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KOfan Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
25. FOB's
Friends of Bush. Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. His "base".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
35. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
36. It's blurry and difficult to read the numbers?
I mean really, white borderless text on horizontal light-blue-and-white stripped background?

Before someone clutches their pearls and/or gets on their high horse, yes I know what it's showing. I'm criticizing the poor-presentation of the information, not the information itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. I agree.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
41. GREED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
43. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mntleo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
44. How about adding low income workers?
As I have testified before the Ways and Means Committee, while the Feds cut taxes, then taxes "trickle down" to the working poor in their states where state lawmakers continue to add regressive taxes in order to make up for what the Feds refuse to grant. The poor pay the highest taxes of anyone in all states, thanks to this.
http://itepnet.org/state_reports/whopaysfactsheets.php

Cat in Seattle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
45. Ain't capitalism grand?

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
46. Rachel had something like this on her program the other day.
But tea party politicians didn't see anything wrong with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grattsl Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
49. It doesn't include self employed - which is highest rate of all
regardless of actual income, self employed means you pay more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judesedit Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
50. Thank you for showing the true picture even a kindergartner can understand
You're the best, Move-on.org. Please don't stop. Something's got to get through the skulls of the brainwashed. Hope it's not when it's too late for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
51. the least productive amongst us all are being rewarded
while screwing America at the same time. That's what this tells me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
54. They forgot to put the vampire fangs on the teacher.
Everyone knows we are blood-sucking childhaters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToonTheNews Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
55. K&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC