MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:02 PM
Original message |
OK: why do we have a judiciary? |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
1. To adjudicate business disputes, silly! |
|
And to exonerate our Galtian overlords when the rabble get too uppity.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
teddy51
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. How many times did President Obama make the statement during his 2008 |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 06:15 PM by teddy51
campaign, that we are a Nation of Laws? Wonder how killing someone with out due process fits that description? To be clear, I am not happy with him deciding to carry out killings of individuals that he determines alone, are guilty.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. To be bought and paid for and pass judgment on unjust laws written by whore legislators. nt |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 06:34 PM by valerief
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
6. You mean if we can't apply it to terrorists abroad |
|
then we may as well abandon it for all purposes?
|
Cherchez la Femme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Seems like someone waved his magic wand & *poof* |
|
no more extra-Constitutional problem.
So it CAN be done. Now how about that? :crazy:
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Corporations are terrorists. |
|
There, someone said it, so it must be true. Go get 'em, Mr. President!
|
AngkorWot
(792 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Why do we have an executive branch? |
|
The terrorists are just going to show up in court?
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Was al-Awlaki indicted? nt |
AngkorWot
(792 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Tried in absentia, IIRC. |
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Under the new order since the coup in 2000 AD, the judiciary serves |
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
14. We need someone to place the crown on the kings head. n/t |
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
15. President Andrew Jackson asked himself the same thing. |
Tesha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
16. To add a fig-leaf of righteousness to the current goings-on. (NT) |
Umbral
(969 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message |
17. That's easy, to exonerate the rich and persecute the poor, duh. nt |
jberryhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-30-11 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
18. To try suspects who can be caught or surrender |
|
But deadly criminals at large who are neither of these run a big risk.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |