Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study: New Voting Restrictions May Affect More than Five Million

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:05 AM
Original message
Study: New Voting Restrictions May Affect More than Five Million
New Voting Restrictions May Affect 5 Million Voters
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/10/03/new_voting_restrictions_may_affect_5_million_voters.html

A Brennan Center study finds 19 recently passed voting laws in 14 states could make it significantly harder for more than five million eligible voters to cast ballots in 2012, leading to "significant electoral impact in next year's hard-fought races."

"The states that have already cut back on voting rights will provide 171 electoral votes in 2012 -- 63% of the 270 needed to win the presidency."

Minorities, poor and young voters will likely be most affected.



Study: New Voting Restrictions May Affect More than Five Million
http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/study_new_voting_restrictions_may_affect_more_than_five_million
(snip)
“This is the most significant cutback in voting rights in decades. More voters may be affected than the margin of victory in two out of the past three presidential elections,” said Michael Waldman, the Center’s executive diector. “In 2012 we should make it easier for every eligible citizen to vote. Instead, we have made it far harder for too many. Partisans should not try to tilt the electoral playing field in this way.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Partisans should not try to tilt the electoral playing field in this way.”
I guess he meant "Republicans" but was too worried about endangering
his organization's 501(c)3 status to actually speak the unvarnished truth.

*THAT* is why Democrats can't get traction on this issue.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Makes sense
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal" Emma Goldman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. NYT covers this study on front page:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. thanks for the link mod mom
Glad it's on the front page
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC