Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The story the Koch Brothers’ were afraid of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:06 PM
Original message
The story the Koch Brothers’ were afraid of
Posted with permission.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_10/the_story_the_koch_brothers_we032577.php


The story the Koch Brothers’ were afraid of

By Steve Benen


Last week, there were rumors about a Bloomberg News piece that was going to make right-wing financiers Charles and David Koch look pretty bad. As Justin Elliott put it, “Here’s a rule of thumb about public relations: When P.R. pros begin furiously spinning a story before it has even come out, there’s a pretty good chance the story is going to be damaging to the reputation of said P.R. pros’ bosses.”

And now we know what the Kochs were afraid of. As it turns out, Bloomberg News has uncovered credible evidence of Koch Industries making “improper payments” (read: bribes) to “secure contracts in six countries dating back to 2002.” One of those countries, it turns out, is Iran, which has purchased millions of dollars of petrochemical equipment from the Kochs’ company, despite a trade ban and the U.S. labeling Iran a state sponsor of terrorism.


Internal company documents show that the company made those sales through foreign subsidiaries, thwarting a U.S. trade ban. Koch Industries units have also rigged prices with competitors, lied to regulators and repeatedly run afoul of environmental regulations, resulting in five criminal convictions since 1999 in the U.S. and Canada.

From 1999 through 2003, Koch Industries was assessed more than $400 million in fines, penalties and judgments. In December 1999, a civil jury found that Koch Industries had taken oil it didn’t pay for from federal land by mismeasuring the amount of crude it was extracting. Koch paid a $25 million settlement to the U.S.

Phil Dubose, a Koch employee who testified against the company said he and his colleagues were shown by their managers how to steal and cheat — using techniques they called the Koch Method. <…>

For six decades around the world, Koch Industries has blazed a path to riches — in part, by making illicit payments to win contracts, trading with a terrorist state, fixing prices, neglecting safety and ignoring environmental regulations. At the same time, Charles and David Koch have promoted a form of government that interferes less with company actions.


I think we now know why Koch Industries was so worried about this article — it’s pretty devastating.

Much of the institutional right has grown quite dependent on the Koch Brothers’ generosity, which has helped finance Tea Party efforts and scores of conservative groups and institutions. But given Koch Industries’ alleged misdeeds, the Kochs’ money may soon need to be considered far more controversial than we’d even been led to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Afraid of the truth getting out. Soooo Republicon
Republicon Family Values are from the bottom of the scuzzbucket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R. Trading with terrorist states? Just like Reagan. Throw the book at them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Deltoid Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Cheney did the same thing with Haliburton
It's what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. He sure did. And, outright lied about it.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1012-33.htm Watching a nation of civilians suffer under heavy sanctions, while breaking them at the same time ..... it is just what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Easy solution. Have congress pass special legislation
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 12:15 PM by ChairmanAgnostic
permitting bribes outside of the US "to level the playing field."

Hell, they own 1/3 of congress already. How much would it cost to buy the rest of it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Nah. Too cumbersome...Let SCOTUS rule. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. good point. 5 is much cheaper than 200+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. What's the surprise? Didn't they make their initial millions off Stalin? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. I do not know about that but if it is true they are real hypocrites - John
Burchers - a group that is supposedly anti-communists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Here it is and yes they are hypocrites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need to shine a BRIGHT light on where their money is going
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 12:21 PM by Vincardog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rules are for the rest of us.
If it was good enough for grandpappy Bush, it's good enough for the Kochs.

"One of those countries, it turns out, is Iran, which has purchased millions of dollars of petrochemical equipment from the Kochs’ company, despite a trade ban and the U.S. labeling Iran a state sponsor of terrorism."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. guess the figured buying our govt wasn't enough
Funny, before Wisconsin few were familiar with the Kochs and their funding habits, as they were far behind the scene players. Now they are a household word in any house that talks about politics. Turns out they were doing all sorts of no-nos that would usually turn the right apoplectic had they been done by a big Dem backer. If this is just the beginning (and this is how these things start to come apart) it becomes probably that eventually their money will be toxic. Worse is the unmasking of the true goals of those funding the teaparty. We see it, but low info voters haven't. De masking the means and motives of the far right, while unleashing the populist anger per the OWS movement - likely makes the moderate middle move leftward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just to be fair: Any nation that trades with the US is trading with a terrorist state, too
because the US is the largest state sponsor of terror in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Criminals like to work in the dark
The less witnesses, the more better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. watch for this story to get buried along with any rupert murdoch stories that come along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wait Wut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. This is why we have "concern trolls"
Post the link to the story on RW sites. I have a teaper persona that I use to feign ignorance. Those are the only sites I don't use the name "WaitWut". Yeah...figured out that mistake quickly. :blush:

I normally get few responses and the link is deleted eventually, but at least I can get it in front of their stupid faces for a minute. Somewhere, their subconscious is saying, "Uhhhhhhh...wtf?" One site I actually have two teaper trolls so I have someone to talk to. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. I never go to those places, so I don't know....
But, the *official reason* for deleting the links: is it because they don't approve of the sources? For example, a counterpunch or alternet or MoveOn link could, from their perspective, be seen as left-wing sites.
If it were a link from, say, The Washington Post, or CNN would they delete those links as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wait Wut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. It's not the source.
It's the subject matter. If you link to an article that criticizes any of their idols it will get deleted. I will go out of my way to find a link to a similar story that comes from a more "neutral" source. That helps remove the "liberal media" objection. Just like here, they'll question a link that comes from a source they see as the enemy and immediately assume you're a troll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worship Money Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh Look
Two of the worst, most destructive entities in the world- the Kochs and the Islamic Republic of Iran- doing business.

They actually have so many right wing humanity destroying "values" in common, it's sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kick and Rec one time for the teabaggers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. And every facet of their business continues to make money.
Why is this? Because the cost of compliance (or legality) is ALWAYS greater than the cost of the fine! So long as that holds true, it is unprofitable NOT to break the law, lie to regulators, and steal from the government and the people.

And these are the 'successful' people that we are accused of wanting to 'steal money' from. It makes me fucking sick to hear that shit. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
46. True. (no text)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. kicking n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. I posted this over at Steve's hang. It applies.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-11 03:33 PM by Tandalayo_Scheisskop
I think it should be pointed out, again and again, that these two worthies, during the W Administration, were in charge of The Strategic Petroleum Reserve.During that time, salt domes that had never seen a drop of oil, previously, were "filled" to the brim.

How much of that is salt water, under the oil, is quite another story.

On edit: One of the K-Bros is married to Dorothea Bush. W's sister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Hey you!
:hi:

And I didn't know that about Dorothea and her douchy husband.

What is Steve's hang?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. No, Hey You!!! ;-)
You know, Benen's site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
48. That's a scary thought
I would bet that there isn't a drop of oil in the Koch Brother tended Strategic Petroleum Reserves. Would certainly explain why the spigots weren't opened when oil prices soared - there aren't any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. So when do they get hit with the RICO charges?
Freeze all their money until the trial is over

Where will the GOP be without the Kock money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. But will it make any difference?
i can't see how, unless they end up in federal prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bloke 32 Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
30. Quite so
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
32. I'll bet there more than a few nutso billionaires waiting in the wings to pick up the slack
(and the power that comes with it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
33. So if you break the law while growing Marijuana
They seize your home and your bank account. You commit treason and that's fine. You keep everything you gained from that crime and then some. If this were Buffet, or Soros the right would be screaming from the roof tops. Mrs Greenspan would have this as her opening story and the whole day on MSNBC would cover it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. I wish I could agree, but I doubt it will make any difference.
Very few Americans (and even fewer teabaggers) are even aware of the Kochs and their money.

A couple petty fines here and there ain't gonna make much difference to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
35. k&r.. Wouldn't you LOVE to see this on CorpoMedia© ?
Don't hold your breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
36. Seize their assets!
Okay, okay, we'll do this the right way...put a doobie in their hand then seize their assets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
37. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
38. We'll need these.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nineteen50 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
39. They hate
America, and love money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldbanjo Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. No more than the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
41. If the Koch Brothers bribed Iranians, what's to stop them from bribing Washingtonians?
Gotta ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. imagine if 1000 unchallenged coordinated radio stations chewed on this for a week or month
but since those radio stations are coordinated by koch funded think tanks they will be doing cover work to help the tea party faithful rationalize and forget it and deflect their blame to obama, etc. "but look what clinton did".

if it hits any kind of momentum they'll turn some molehill to turn into a mountain to distract the media.

this has been working well for 20 years, right under the left's collective nose kicking it's collective ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
45. kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
47. Explains a lot of why they are so anti-government, too
They don't like having to follow the law. A $25 million settlement to the US, despite that it's just a drop in the bucket for them, obviously angered them.

They are a blatant example of the wealthy that got wealthy by breaking the law. I won't hold my breath for either of them to go to jail, though, no matter how much they both deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC