Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those who say OWS needs to define their message

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:45 PM
Original message
For those who say OWS needs to define their message
Over the last thirty years Bush's base, the haves and have mores have declared war on every American who does not belong to their club. Starting with the Air Traffic Controllers, they have been crushing unions to drive down wages and are now going after the public service unions to destroy them too. They have destroyed our entire manufacturing base and shipped all of our jobs to India and Communist China and anyplace else where they can exploit labor for subsistence wages and increase their profits.
They have raised taxes on the working people by eliminating things like the ability to deduct the interest on credit card debt and raising the cap on Social Security on everyone who makes less than $107,000.00 a year while giving tax break after tax break to themselves to the point where some of the biggest corporations on earth pay no taxes at all.
They have mad a college education so expensive that only the very rich or the very indebted can afford it and once you graduate, unless your daddy is rich and your mother is good looking, you cant find a job anyway.
They have closed the mental hospitals, throwing the least among us out into the street to fend for themselves.
They have started war after pointless,endless war, creating armies of underemployed, unemployed, physically and mentally fucked up vets that they have no intention of taking care of. Wars that have drained our treasury while our infrastructure falls apart beneath our very feet.
They have wiped out the equity in our homes and foreclosed on them in numbers never before seen.
They have stolen our pensions.
They have taken federal bailouts in amounts that most of us can't even comprehend and used it to pay themselves obscene bonuses and instead of using it to save jobs or rescue the economy they've moved it offshore and increased credit costs and banking fees in amounts that would make loan sharks blush.
Even as I write this they are trying to destroy the FDA, FCC, USDA, OSHA.FHA,FEC , AFDC, WIC and everything else that might serve to protect us from them.
They are polluting and destroying our planet in the name of the God of profit at a rate that, if not checked soon, will lead to our extinction.
And that's just off the top of my head.
You wonder what the message is?

What part of THAT WILL NOT FIT ON A FUCKING BUMPER STICKER don't you understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe "define their message" means "have a goal."
Nobody can seem to explain what specific reform goals or new laws are the point, beyond expressing general anger and dissatisfaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How about prosecuting those bankers who committed crimes? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay, for what crimes?
Lest we forget, the primary reason this happened was deregulation and the legalization of unsafe practices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Actually, anyone with a big enough wallet and some will power
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 03:57 PM by truedelphi
Could impeach Tim Geithner for his lying to Congress on more than one occassion.

When an appointed official lies to Congress - it is an impeachable offense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Lying how, exactly?
"Shit made up on the internet" doesn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. Robosigning. All that fraud with the mortgages changing hands.

You can't tell me that's not illegal. Hiring people to sign papers that they have no authority to sign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I agree that one message would be better than being all over
the board....but the roots are deepening and a coherent message will be the outgrowth...

the average folks are mad as hell and we just aren't going to take it anymore......

we have reached what I call critical mass....laugh if you want MSM,wall street and politicians...the joke will be on you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vets74 Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. OWS SPEAKER will address DU members Saturday at 11 AM, Broadway & Liberty Street -- Y'all come !!
Southeast corner. At the Big Cube on the sidewalk at Brown Brothers Harriman.

-- Arrangements made for this event today with the OWS organizers.

-- Easily 250 DU attendees can be addressed at this site.

-- As many as 1,000 DU attendees can be incorporated directly into OWS plans for peaceful protest early Saturday afternoon.

We will have an invitation posted using the main occupy_wall_street account.

Check the General Discussion thread for statements and bulletins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. The risk for Democrats is this is turned into an ANTI-CORPORATION movement
then it will fail.

Americans like their corporations. Wall St? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Really? Whose stock is getting traded up on Wall Street?
Who are the people lining Congress' pockets? Anyone loyal to a corporation that does dirt is a sucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Public Servant Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Communist Manifesto wouldn't fit on a bumper sticker either
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 03:01 PM by Proud Public Servant
But it still had a message, clear goals, and even a soundbite ("Workers of the World Unite!"). OWS has a soundbite ("We are the 99%") but could use a little work on the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. False premise
but nice try equating the Marx and Engels dialectic of 1848 with a modern event exercising freedom of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. The haters here on DU need something simple to attack & show "concern" over
They don't have it and therefore are attacking a ghost.

It frustrates the trolls & cheerleaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. The 1% wants to know
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 03:05 PM by moondust
how much it's going to cost them to make those fucking hippies go away!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Now THAT'S a bumper sticker, albeit a long one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. My message is:
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 03:13 PM by CJCRANE
we don't want to pay for the banks' mistakes.

The banks received trillions. The people got nothing. Now we're left with the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. "The banks received trillions"? First off, no, they didn't.
The banks didn't receive trillions.

Second, they were obligated to pay back what they did get--and the federal government made a profit on that, actually.

Want to try that again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Globally, they did if you take into account quantitive easing
emergency loans and various other sleights of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Care to post proof?
Reputable sources, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. So there haven't been bailouts
quantitive easing and secret loans by the Fed annd central banks around the world?

That isn't in doubt.

If you want to argue over the exact amount that's fair enough but it doesn't negate the main point: taxpayers the world over provided the safety net for the banks' mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. You're trying to change the topic. Prove there have been trillions in secret giveaways.
Paid back loans don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. From Forbes...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/traceygreenstein/2011/09/20/the-feds-16-trillion-bailouts-under-reported/

The Fed's $16 Trillion Bailouts Under-reported

"The audit of the Fed’s emergency lending programs was scarcely reported by mainstream media – albeit the results are undoubtedly newsworthy. It is the first audit of the Fed in United States history since its beginnings in 1913. The findings verify that over $16 trillion was allocated to corporations and banks internationally, purportedly for “financial assistance” during and after the 2008 fiscal crisis."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Do you imagine that the fed actually has $16 trillion dollars laying around?
That's more than the annual GDP of the United States. The word that you're missing, and which Forbes is ignoring to make a juicier story, is LENDING. A big part of what the Fed does is very short term loans (often overnight), mostly to large banks. A few million dollars at a time, in loans hundreds or even thousands of times a week, adds up very fast, so you can say that they "lent $16 trillion dollars to big banks." But the reality of it is that that amount of money was never involved, nor was it just given away. The idea that you could disappear $16 trillion dollars without anyone noticing is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Are you really unaware of the many fine OP's up the week that
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 04:03 PM by truedelphi
The audit of the Federal Reserve that Bernie Sanders insisted upon, as watered down as it ended up being, found that



NINE TRILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS WERE HANDED OVER

BY BEN BERNANKE TO THE TOP FINANCIAL FIRMS ??



And then, if you admit you know that, the next thing you will want to go on record saying is: those Nine Trillions of dollars have been paid back. (Sort of the "Your Honor, I don't have a dog," and then "the One I have has very old, worn down teeth."

This money has NOT BEEN really paid back. The Federal Reserve offered up American dollars, represented by Bernanke's creation of digital accounts, off the funds available to the Federal Reserve, and then those firms receiving this plunder paid us back with the same worthless invetment papers that had gotten the Amerian economy into a log jam to beign with.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I'm aware that you apparently don't understand what you're referring to.
Get back to me when you can provide credible proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Well Bloomberg news good enough for you? They obtained thousands of
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 04:29 PM by truedelphi
Pages of doucments through the FOIA

And then, a very nice piece on this issue jsut came out today


http://www.nationofchange.org/first-federal-reserve-audit-reveals-trillions-secret-bailouts-1314633089

The first-ever audit of the U.S. Federal Reserve has revealed 16 trillion dollars in secret bank bailouts and has raised more questions about the quasi-private agency’s opaque operations.

"This is a clear case of socialism for the rich and rugged, you’re-on-your-own individualism for everyone else," U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders, an Independent from Vermont, said in a statement.

The majority of loans were issues by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY).
(my comment here: And that might allow for another impeachment of Tim Geithner - he was really amanipulator above and beyond what laws would allow. He could not only be retroactively impeached for his holding the office of Head of The fed of NY state at that time, he very well might RICO'ed into a quite non-flattering outfit of stripes or bright orange.)

back to the article:

<snip>The GAO report noted on Sep. 19, 2008, William Dudley, who is now the President of the FRBNY, was granted a waiver to let him keep investments in AIG and General Electric, while at the same time the Federal Reserve granted bailout funds to the same two companies.

"No one who works for a firm receiving direct financial assistance from the Fed should be allowed to sit on the Fed’s board of directors or be employed by the Fed," Sanders said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Enough is Enough!"..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. When they say cut back, we say fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. You need a bumper sticker instead of a 50 point screed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. it's a way the media is being dismissive of the movement. ..as if it matters less
it's the meme

when they all say it, you know it's been faxed, emailed, tweeted, phoned, skyped...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. ignore them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanbean Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. The part that I don't understand is the font size. If you get my drift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. Any philosophy that will fit in a nutshell - belongs there.
To me, the essential message seems to be "Thinking in soundbites IS the problem. It is NO PART of the solution."

After this, everything else follows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. It all adds up to one conclusion:
Competition is a danger to the survival of the competitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC