Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mississippi considers anti-abortion 'personhood amendment'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:23 AM
Original message
Mississippi considers anti-abortion 'personhood amendment'
The anti-abortion movement's tactic known as a "personhood amendment," which legally defines a person as existing at the moment of fertilization, has been rejected twice in recent years by voters in Colorado.

But the effort has found new life in Mississippi, where a personhood amendment will appear on the Nov. 8 ballot. Mississippi is, by some measures, the nation's most conservative state, and the proposal has earned the support of both the Democratic and Republican candidates for governor, the majority of attorney general candidates, and a host of other state leaders.

If Proposition 26 passes, abortion foes hope it will build momentum for a broader national assault on Roe vs. Wade. Supporters say similar propositions will be featured on ballots in Florida, South Dakota and Ohio in 2012.

Both sides in the debate agree that the measure would outlaw abortion, even in the cases of rape and incest. But there is disagreement about what other, potentially wide-ranging effects it may have.


more

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/10/mississippi_personhood_amendment.html

Personhood USA, which spearheaded the Colorado ballot measures, is heading up the Mississippi effort. The liberal investigative magazine Mother Jones notes that another major player this time around is a man named Les Riley, founder of the group Personhood Mississippi. Riley, the magazine reported, is a neo-secessionist who "once supported an effort to form an independent theocratic republic in South Carolina."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is unconstitutional.
Meanwhile, Mississippi has some of the highest levels of poverty in the nation. What the fuck are repukes doing about that? Oh, that's right. NOTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. How do you figure that a constitutional amendment can be "unconstitutional"?
And if the religious right really wants to end
abortion, this is the way to do it.

It's absolutely the wrong politics, of course:
by actually ending abortion rather than merely
forever talking about ending it, not only do
the Republicans lose one of their favorite
"dog whistles", but they just might finally
piss off Republican women.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mississippi - yep, sounds fitting for Mississippi. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. It will pass
Of course, it won't be enforceable, but it will pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is not good.
Let's say there is a psychopathic nutcase who decides to have lots of children by becoming a serial rapist?

Will those victims be forced to carry to term and raise the child? What about wives who are being raped or abused? WIll they be tied to their abuser for life because of the child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Every pregnant woman should take out a million dollar
life insurance policy on their one-week old fetuses. Had I done that, I'd be $3 million richer, because I had miscarriages.

Surely the insurance companies would have to recognize the persons, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC