Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High-Tech Border Fence: Obama Administration Cancels Project

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Derechos Donating Member (892 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 08:48 PM
Original message
High-Tech Border Fence: Obama Administration Cancels Project
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday ended a high-tech border fence project that cost taxpayers nearly $1 billion but did little to improve security. Congress ordered the high-tech fence along the border with Mexico in 2006 amid a clamor over the porous border, but it yielded only 53 miles of protection.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said the lesson of the multimillion-dollar program is there is no "one-size-fits-all" solution for border security.

Napolitano said the department's new technology strategy for securing the border is to use existing, proven technology tailored to the distinct terrain and population density of each region of the nearly 2,000-mile U.S-Mexico border. That would provide faster technology deployment, better coverage and more bang for the buck, she said.

Although it has been well known that the virtual fence project would be dumped, Napolitano officially informed key members of Congress Friday that an "independent, quantitative, science-based review made clear" the fence, known as SBInet, "cannot meet its original objective of providing a single, integrated border security technology solution."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/15/high-tech-border-fence-ends_n_809450.html?ir=World
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. No chance of the border contractor volunteering to give the money back, I suppose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Really? It only cost 1 billion? Tell you what: I'll only charge 500 million
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 11:36 PM by Edweird
to tell you what a dumbass idea something like that is and you can pocket the other 500 million. Deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I could have told them it wouldn't work
as could most anyone who has ever hiked the AZ desert. I wouldn't have charged them but a million or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. This was supposed to demonstrate Congress's commitment to securing the border
The border was supposed to be secured following the 1986 amnesty. That's how they sold it to the public: we'll grant amnesty this one time, then we'll get serious about securing the border. Trust us. Well, 20 years later, in 2006, Bush & the Republican-led Congress was trying to pass another amnesty bill but people called them out on it. Why should they be trusted to secure the border this time, when Congress was supposed to have done it 20 years ago yet failed to do so? Their answer was a promise to build a "virtual fence" to show America that they could be trusted to secure the border so that this new amnesty would be the last amnesty; there wouldn't need to be yet another amnesty 20 years down the road.

I must say, I'm completely shocked that it didn't work and the border is no more secure now than it was 5 years ago.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC