|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 05:49 PM Original message |
Justice Stevens, in new memoir, rebukes Bush for 2000 recount maneuver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Bush displayed BULLY TRAITS in them days...he was not a good model for The Oval Office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Those who voted to hear this case will never be forgotten in our history...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChandlerJr (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 05:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Quick, without going to the Google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 06:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Asshole #1, Asshole #2, Asshole #3, Asshole #4, and Asshole #5, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Fat Tony Scalia, William Klansman Rhenquist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. There was great chaos under heaven, and the GOP found the situation to be excellent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libinnyandia (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. Nader 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Damn pro-reality judicial activists! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. It took 5 non-elected traitors to hand the 2000 election to GWB. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 07:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. It was a strange ruling from the states-rights strict-constructionist crowd: they decided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
10. so how did the supremes come to support this admittedly 'frivolous' application? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-10-11 07:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Because if GWB would have lost his case it would cause grievous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC