Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What caused the wealth gap? Economist Jeffrey Sachs explains where it came from

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:41 PM
Original message
What caused the wealth gap? Economist Jeffrey Sachs explains where it came from


Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 1:40 AM 10:18:57 UTC+1000

What caused the wealth gap


Protesters are furious over America's growing income disparity. Economist Jeffrey Sachs explains where it came from

By Alice Karekezi

snips:

For anybody interested in understanding the reasons behind this economic travesty, economist Jeffrey Sachs’ new book, “The Price of Civilization,” is required reading. In the book, Sachs, who has focused much of his career on the developing world and eradicating global poverty, turns his eye homeward to examine the current economic crisis, tracing its roots not to the housing or financial bubbles of the ’00s, but to a shift in Washington toward smaller government that began in the early ’80s and has yet to be reversed.

snip:

Why the 1970s?

The main effect of globalization, which is known but somehow weirdly separated from our politics, has been that those who have products, or services, or celebrity, or other things that they can sell to world markets, have found a boon in globalization. But for most of American society, and certainly for the majority of Americans who don’t have a bachelor’s degree, globalization has meant facing much lower-wage workers abroad and increasingly powerful competitive pressures. So our society began to separate between the “haves” and the “have-nots,” really in the early 1980s. And while this crucial dynamic was underway, American politics was going in almost the opposite direction.

How so?

Reagan came to office with a diagnosis, most famously put in his inaugural speech, that government is not the solution, but the problem. This was put forward as the reason why the 1970s were so shaky, why we were experiencing more instability. Reagan made a big and wrong diagnosis, with extraordinary consequences, and a lot of the country bought it.


Each of the parties is constantly feeding at the trough of major interest groups. The Democrats, basically, were sold to Wall Street by Clinton, and they’ve remained in Wall Street’s hands up until now. And that is one of the greatest failings of the Obama administration: the fact that he couldn’t find his way clear of the major interest group that helped bring him to office, and therefore he really couldn’t undertake deeper changes in the country.

snip:

You lay out an extensive plan for climbing out of this crisis. What are some of the steps you propose?

There is no quick fix right now. A quick fix would occur if we had hit a bump in the road of a normally functioning economy, but my point is that we had growing rot that was disguised by financial bubbles. Rebuilding the infrastructure, strengthening the scientific base, having an energy system that moves to a sustainable renewables, low-carbon economy, improving educational outcome so that more kids make it all the way through – those are 10-year projects, more or less. When the started in the mid-1950s it was understood that this was going to take a long time to do but that we were going to make the investment to build a whole national system.

to read full article:

http://news.salon.com/2011/10/11/what_caused_the_wealth_gap/singleton/




for information on this book by Jeffrey Sachs, The Price of Civilization: Reawakening American Virtue and Prosperity

link:


http://books.google.com/books?id=FC5xHL4ENxUC&dq=The+Price+of+Civilization:+Reawakening+American+Virtue+and+Prosperity&hl=en&ei=VzKWTpT2DKXbiALLp83ODQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. That growing "rot" is money in politics

Nothing will change or be fixed until it is stopped.

The other "rot" is the two party system. You have no options when it comes to voting. Right now, where wall st is concerned, it looks like a one party system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EdMaven Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. It came from the super-rich deciding they needed more. The rest is just apologetics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam11111 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. tax cuts for the rich did it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, that sums it up.

Work on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC