Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman attempts to block 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:26 AM
Original message
Congressman attempts to block 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal
(CNN) - The repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy may hit a road block in Congress next week.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-California, is drafting a bill that would change how - and possibly if - the repeal is implemented. The repeal law passed in December requires the president, defense secretary and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to certify that the military is ready for the change. Hunter's bill would require the four service chiefs to also sign off on the policy change.

At a December hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Army, Marine Corps and Air Force chiefs expressed concern about the effect a possible repeal of the ban on homosexuals openly serving in the military would have on active combat units.

Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, said the congressman wants the chiefs involved in the process to ensure the repeal "doesn't impact combat readiness."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/15/congressman-attempts-to-block-dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Duncan Hunter is a nutcase
He's scared of 'illegals' and I guess he's afraid of homosexuals as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. How do these people even function in life being so stupid?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just heard on Tweety that Pawlenty spoke at some Xtian
RW group and took the same position.

Here's the link
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Pawlenty-Says-Hed-Reinstate-Dont-Ask-Dont-Tell-6560
<snip>
If elected president, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty would bring back the ban on gays in the military, he told radio host Bryan Fischer Thursday. The repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell passed with several Republican votes, so a hypothetical President Pawlenty might have a tough time getting a repeal of a repeal through Congress, The Hill's Michael O'Brien reports.

"There's a lot of reasons for that," Pawlenty explained, " but if you look at how the combat commanders and the combat units feel about it, the results of those kinds of surveys were different than the ones that were mostly reported in the newspaper and that is something I think we need to pay attention to."


The governor's position is unexpected, given overwhelming public support for letting gay serve openly in the armed forces. Even Sen. John McCain, who fought hard to prevent the repeal of DADT, said last week he will now "do everything can to make it work."
-------------
Is there a bigger opportunist anywhere on the planet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm so damn tired
of these fuckwads. Can't they leave people alone?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. this is the republican strategy...this way they don't have to offer a thing
spend 2 years dismantling whatever gains the democrats got
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Heck, why not drum them out of the military completely?
If you asked Congressman Hunter point-blank: "Do you you think Gays should be serving in the military", I suspect the answer he'd give you (whether for principle or for politics) was "no".

In any event, it's not remotely a road block, because the Senate won't pass it and the President won't sign it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, we're going to give the military the right of veto?
Sound like the government of Japan from 1920-1945.

But since the Joint Chiefs serve at the pleasure of the President, and must obey the orders of The Commander in Chief, then the President could *order* them to sign off on the change or submit thier resignations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC