Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10,000 GMAC Foreclosures Stopped in Maryland - FDL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:07 PM
Original message
10,000 GMAC Foreclosures Stopped in Maryland - FDL
10,000 GMAC Foreclosures Stopped in Maryland
By: David Dayen - FDL
Sunday January 16, 2011 7:00 am

<snip>

In a major ruling Friday, a coalition of nonprofit defense lawyers and consumer protection advocates in Maryland successfully got over 10,000 foreclosure cases managed by GMAC Mortgage tossed out, because affidavits in the cases were signed by Jeffrey Stephan, the infamous GMAC “robo-signer” who attested to the authenticity of foreclosure documents without any knowledge about them, as well as signing other false statements.

The University of Maryland Consumer Protection Clinic and Civil Justice, Inc., a nonprofit, filed the class action lawsuit, arguing that any case using Jeffrey Stephan as a signer was illegitimate and must be dismissed. In court Friday, GMAC agreed to dismiss every case in Maryland relying on a Stephan affidavit. They can refile foreclosure actions on the close to 10,000 homes, but only at their own expense, and subject to new Maryland regulations which require mandatory mediation between borrower and lender before moving to foreclosure. Civil Justice and the Consumer Protection Clinic also want any cases with affidavits from Xee Moua of Wells Fargo, who has also admitted to robo-signing, thrown out, but that case has not yet been settled.

This was not the plan of GMAC and other banks caught using robo-signers last year. They hoped to undergo a pause in proceedings, run a quick “double-check” and then issue substitute documents in the same cases. That would have been a much more rapid solution for the banks and would have resulted in many more foreclosures. Now GMAC has to go back and basically file the entire case all over again, meaning they have to give notice of foreclosure to the borrower, engage the borrower in modification options, and basically run through the whole process from the beginning. They cannot use the shortcut solution, thanks to the class action suit filed. GMAC’s dismissal of every foreclosure in Maryland shows their doubts they would have won the class action.

The Consumer Protection Clinic at the U. of Maryland is a class taught by Peter Holland. Rather than just read and lecture about foreclosure fraud and consumer protection law, Holland has the class join motions, prepare cross-examinations and legitimately get involved in the cases. It reminds me of the class of Alan Dershowitz depicted in the film Reversal of Fortune, or the Medill Innocence Project investigating wrongful convictions at Northwestern. Given the national scope of foreclosure fraud, you can imagine classes like this springing up all over the country.

<snip>

More: http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/01/16/10000-gmac-foreclosures-stopped-in-maryland/

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am very disappointed that the President did not put a
moratorium on foreclosures to protect the people he took an oath to protect
because there was proof that fraud was being committed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Are these modification laws significantly different from the Federal laws?
Those didn't seem to make much of a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Okay I was reading up on the law and basically all it requires is a face to face meeting.
And it also requires wait times and fees on both sides. I can't find much on a modification program.

And look at this irony...

http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/real-estate/bs-bz-maryland-mortgage-program-20101220,0,4797928.story

Despite nationally recognized efforts to help residents avoid foreclosure, the state of Maryland has been slow to make mortgage payments more affordable for the struggling homeowners whose loans it owns.

Gov. Martin O'Malley and his administration have pressed national loan servicers in recent years to work with homeowners rather than foreclose. But it wasn't until four months ago that the state — which lends money to first-time homebuyers — designed a program to lower monthly mortgage payments to an amount that its borrowers in trouble could afford, The Baltimore Sun has learned.

Only three such modifications have been approved so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. GMAC is one vile company, we pulled a car loan from them back in the 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC