Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-11 09:42 PM
Original message |
I heard that Palin got pissy with Fox Snooze and Fox (or Murdock) smacked her down. But I can't find |
|
any news stories about this taking place. I was told that Fox smacked her down hard yesterday.
Did this really happen? Any links?
Thanks
|
brettdale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Hopefully it happened!!!!!!
|
secondwind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
2. From your lips...... I hope it happened. |
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Here's some info but NOT from this week |
|
October 5, 2011 Roger Ailes: "I hired Sarah Palin because she was hot and got ratings." http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2011/10/roger-ailes-i-hired-sarah-palin-because.htmlAnd in the video below Palin compares CNN to Fox and finds CNN more favorable. September 28, 2011 VIDEO: http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2011/09/grizzled-mama-drops-her-facade-and.html
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-14-11 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thank you. That must be it. |
HipChick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-13-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I expect Fox to drop her any day now..
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-14-11 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Palin who? The Palin whose tits ran for President in 2008, that's who. n/t |
Amonester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-14-11 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
although, she didn't know (still doesn't) what the job was all about... :crazy:
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-14-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. you didn't get it, did you. her supporters thought she was in the top spot, it wasn't for her brains |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |